Channel
@ID_Science_and_Philosophy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
582subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001361603435 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ID_Science_and_Philosophy |
| Created | 15 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ID_Science_and_Philosophy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 582 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 580 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 579 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 578 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 579 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 580 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 581 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
48 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 26 | 54.2% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 35.4% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2025 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Here are the main theses and arguments from Casey Luskin's presentation in the video: 🔹 The "1% Human/Chimp Genetic Difference" is a False Icon of Evolution: Luskin argues that the long-standing claim that humans and chimpanzees share 99% of their DNA is factually incorrect and acts as a misleading "icon of evolution" in textbooks [01:44]. 🔹 Complete Sequencing Reveals a 15% Genetic Difference: Citing a breakthro…
❤2🔥1
Before an epic 11,000-kilometer nonstop flight from Alaska to New Zealand, the bar-tailed godwit accomplishes the impossible. To reduce its weight, its internal organs (stomach, intestines, and liver) literally shrink, making room for fat reserves and powerful muscles. And after landing, its body is completely restored.
❤6🔥2👍1
https://youtu.be/NAPhBt8VJCM
https://youtu.be/zJwFPD8xZX0
👍1
https://youtu.be/asCqyTCaoNM
❤1👍1
The idea of evolution based solely on random mutations appears highly questionable and outdated in light of modern discoveries. We are talking about dozens of molecular machines (often non-homologous), highly complex DNA repair systems, and multi-stage mechanisms of transcription and translation. If such highly organized systems arose repeatedly in the past, as Darwinists believe, then it is reasonable to suppose (or…
👍1
Remember that 98% of our DNA we labeled as junk? Turns out it wasn’t trash—it was just unread mail. Scientists finally cracked its code and found secret links to Alzheimer’s hiding in plain sight. We’ve finally stopped ignoring the genome's "spam folder," and it’s a total game-changer for brain health. 🧠🧬 👇 Check it out: ScienceDaily
👍3❤1
https://youtu.be/I0InjvwBXTg?si=r4xZdL8Bg5rHH2LA
❤4🤔2
https://youtu.be/d_emER-RAyU
👍2
https://youtu.be/_TJWuDAa4sM
https://youtu.be/R_VV2tgGMeY
https://youtu.be/h0GAUGHba4I
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ID_Science_and_Philosophy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Intelligent Design: Science & Philosophy” (@ID_Science_and_Philosophy), 582 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ID_Science_and_Philosophy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.