Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مرصد الامن السيبراني العراقي ICO

Channel

مرصد الامن السيبراني العراقي ICO

@ICOQI

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

580subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002312572098
TypeChannel
Username@ICOQI
Created13 February 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ICOQI

Growth

575580577.57 August 2026 — 575 subscribers8 August 2026 — 575 subscribers8 August 2026 — 576 subscribers23 August 2026 — 580 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 574–581 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 11:07580+4
8 Aug 2026, 04:31576+1
8 Aug 2026, 03:30575no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:17575first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 13 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

91 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6167.0%
🔥2022.0%
🫡44.40%
❤‍🔥22.20%
💯22.20%
👌11.10%
👎11.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2025 to 16 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Mar 2026, 12:42 UTC387 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📡 حرب الترددات: ليش بدت الدرونات تترك الـ 5.8 GHz؟ راح نركز بهذا المنشور شلون تجارب الجبهة بأوكرانيا جاي تغير تكنولوجيا وتكتيكات الدرونات بالعالم. هنا راح نسولف عن "الترندات" التقنية الجبيرة وتأثيرها على الحروب الجاية. ​بالجبهة الأوكرانية-الروسية، واضح جداً إن "الحرب الإلكترونية" (EW) بدت تنقل الصراع لمنطقة جديدة، وهي ترددات بث الفيديو. الموضوع مگام يعتمد بس على قوة الإشارة أو نوع الإنتينة، صار الموضوع هو "شلون تختا

5

16 Mar 2026, 12:37 UTC339 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

​⚠️ 15 ألف دولار على مود Raspberry Pi؟ كشف أسرار درون الاعتراض AS3 "Surveyor" 🧐🤖 ​حرب الدرونات هالأيام كشفت واقع صادم: تكنولوجيا شركات السلاح اللي تنباع بآلاف الدولارات، تطلع من جوه عبارة عن قطع عادية متوفرة بالسوق! الصور الأخيرة لدرون Surveyor (المختص باعتراض الدرونات) وضحت هالشي كلش. ​🔍 شنو لكينا داخل الدرون؟ ​1️⃣ الكمبيوتر الرئيسي: القلب النابض هو Raspberry Pi 4 Model B! القطعة اللي يستخدموها الطلاب بمشاريعهم وما

2

4 Mar 2026, 17:04 UTC454 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

تحذير أمني عاجل: ثغرة "ClawJacked" تفتك بـ OpenClaw ​تم اكتشاف "سلسلة ثغرات" (Vulnerability Chain) حرجة في OpenClaw تسمح لأي موقع ويب خبيث بالسيطرة الكاملة على وكيل الذكاء الاصطناعي المحلي لديك بمجرد زيارة الموقع، دون أي تفاعل منك ودون الحاجة لأي إضافات. ​التأثير التقني (Impact Analysis): ​تنفيذ أكواد عن بعد (RCE): المهاجم يتحكم في الـ Terminal الخاص بالوكيل. ​سرقة البيانات (Exfiltration): الوصول لملفاتك المحلية ومفا

5

1 Mar 2026, 16:01 UTC542 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

العيوب في كود كلود تعرض أجهزة المطورين للخطر تسلط الثغرات الضوء على عيب كبير في دمج الذكاء الاصطناعي في سير عمل تطوير البرمجيات والتأثير المحتمل على سلاسل التوريد. ثلاث ثغرات أمنية حرجة في أداة البرمجة المدعومة بالذكاء الاصطناعي من Anthropic، كلود كود، عرضت المطورين للسيطرة الكاملة على الأجهزة وسرقة بيانات الاعتماد بمجرد فتح مستودع للمشروع. قامت Anthropic بإصلاح المشاكل بعد أن اكتشفت Check Point Research العيوب وأبلغ

5

25 Jan 2026, 18:54 UTC≈3,560 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

كيف قامت Waze ببناء أكبر نظام مراقبة جماعي في العالم بهدوء التحقيق كامل من صاحب المصدر كما تم ادراج رابط التغريدة في الملف .......................................................... ملاحظة مهمة !! قبل سنة من الان قمنا بتبليغ كل الجهات الأمنية والمختصة ولكن لم يستمع أي احد لنا عن خطورة هذا التطبيق فلا تمثلون دور المصدومين رجاءً

4👌1

15 Nov 2025, 16:50 UTC≈2,920 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲: BF-80 at checkout to claim the offer. https://pentestingexams.com

8👎1

3 Nov 2025, 10:33 UTC≈2,870 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

بعض أوامر المهمة في استخدام curl

1

4 May 2025, 19:36 UTCviews —

مرصد الامن السيبراني العراقي ICO pinned «https://www.instagram.com/p/DJPlFUZt1T6/?igsh=b3RqcWx0ZDdqeXI= شركة ميتا تكافئ الشاب علي جعفر بعد ابلاغهم بثغرة امنية»

4 May 2025, 19:36 UTC≈1,630 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/p/DJPlFUZt1T6/?igsh=b3RqcWx0ZDdqeXI= شركة ميتا تكافئ الشاب علي جعفر بعد ابلاغهم بثغرة امنية

3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ICOQI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Mar 2025, 20:18 UTCAnonymous Poll1,020 voters approx.

شنو النظام المفضل عندك والي تستخدمه في مجال cyber security

  1. Windows23%
  2. Linux70%
  3. Mac3%
  4. Another system4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2025 to 16 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 404,311 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مرصد الامن السيبراني العراقي ICO” (@ICOQI), 580 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ICOQI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.