2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 648–650 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 18:45
649
no change
31 Aug 2026, 18:30
649
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 26 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 649 subscribers
Avg views / post
65.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held
19 (26 March 2026 – 26 August 2026)
Views total
131
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
31 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
474
Videos
103
Links
145
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
14
50.0%
😐
4
14.3%
🤣
4
14.3%
💯
3
10.7%
🗿
3
10.7%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
في منتصف الثمانينات وقف هيوبرت دريفوس يقول شيئا كان وقتها يبدو تشاؤما تجاه الذكاء الصناعي، لكن بعيون ٢٠٢٦ المفارقة أن الرجل أخطأ في النتيجة وأصاب جزءا كبيرا من الطريق.
الذكاء الصناعي وقتها كان قائما على فكرة نيويل وسايمون: العقل «نظام رموز فيزيائي»، عنده تمثيلات للعالم ثم يعالجها بقواعد منطقية، فإذا استخرجنا من الإنسان ما يعرفه وما يستعمله من قواعد ووضعناه في الحاسوب حصلنا على الذكاء.
وبالفعل نجحوا في عوالم صغيرة ج…
احد جنود الإحتلال:
"الناس يصفوننا بقاتلي الأطفال، ولكن أتعلمون ماذا؟ إنهم ليسوا على خطأ ولا ينبغي لنا أن نخجل من ذلك. أنا فخور بأن أكون واحداً منهم لأن هذا ما أمر به هاشيم (الرب). لقتل العماليق، وذلك يشمل الرجال، النساء، الرضع، الحيوانات وحتى أشجارهم. لقد خدمت في جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي في غزة مع لواء جفعاتي الـ 84 ولم يرَ الكثير منا أي مشكلة في ذلك، في الواقع كنا نتلقى التشجيع في بعض الأحيان. لا أشعر بأي عاطفة عندما ي…
أستمعت قبل قليل لمقدمة مناظرة لأحد الأحمدية.
سبحان الله ، يحتج من بحار الأنوار ((للمجلسي الرافضي الذي يقول بتواتر الروايات في تحريف القرآن وعدم وجود فرق حقيقي بين الله و١٢ والبداء -الجهل لله بالمستقبل- وغيره من المقالات.))
وينقل من ابن عربي الملحد المحترق الذي يقول بوحدة الوجود. ويقتبس من أحلام البشر التي تأتيهم ويجدها حجة على الناس) ليثبت بها وبغيرها من اضغاث الشياطين المرزا أحمد أنه النبي محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم.
نيويورك بوست في ما قد يسمى فضيحة تكتب لنا خبر
" حاخام يهودي يقتل بيد عصابة كولومبية"
وبعد معرفتنا لتفاصيل اكثر ان هذا الحاخام ذهب بحثا عن قاصر ليتزوجها تعيد صياغة الخبر وتقول
" اب امريكي وجد مقتولا بعد محاولته الفاشلة للزواج من قاصر"
____
هذه واحدة من اهم اسباب عدم الوثوق في الإعلام الحديث لأنه يلمع من يمتلك السلطة عليه ، لا يملكون الأمانة في نقل الخبر وصياغته فمن اللحظة التي يكون فيها الخبر يشوه اليهود تجد ان الصيا…
التشهير جريمة سيئة ، انا أعلم صعوبة ومرار التجربة التي جعلتك تكتب في العلن..
لكن المصيبة في التشهير بذاته الذي يعتبر ضرر وتأليب للرأي العام.
فالتشهير يجعل القضية تتحول من شخصين او شخص ومنشأة الى شخص ومجتمع او منشأة ومجتمع.
وفيه من الضرر الشيء الكثير ، فلا يصح من ناحية تنظيمية (أقصد تنظيمي حياتي ) أن يكون كل شخص يشهر ويألب الناس.
ربي يجنبنا المصائب ما ظهر منها وما بطن.
هل كان عمر بن الخطاب رضي الله عنه وهابيًّا ؟؟
___
قطع عمر بن الخطاب رضي الله عنه الشجرة التي جلس تحتها رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وأهل بيعة الرضوان
لماذا ؟
لمَّا رأى عمر رضي الله عنه أناسًا يجعلون صلاتهم تحتها ، فخشي عمر رضي الله عنه أن يقع ما هو أعظم ، فأمر بقطعها فقطعت ...
قال الحافظ ابن حجر - رحمه الله - في فتح الباري :
" وجدت عند ابن سعد بإسناد صحيح عن نافع أن عمر بلغه أن قومًا يأتون الشجرة فيصلون عندها، ف…
والذي أعتقده من خلال التأمل في الإرجائية (المرجئة عليهم من الله ما يستحقون) أنها لا تختلف عن العلمانية من ناحية الاعتقاد ومن ناحية السلوك، فمن ناحية الاعتقاد يرى المرجئ الغالي: أن المسلم يكفيه أن يعرف أن الله موجود ليكون مسلماً، وبعضهم يرى أنه لا بد من النطق بكلمة الإيمان ولا يكفي مجرد المعرفة، فما الفرق بين هذا المفهوم والمفهوم العلماني للإيمان «الاختياري»؟، وأما من جانب السلوك والتطبيق، فالمرجئة قد فصلوا العمل «ال…
الآمدي الأشعري ينكر ان الله خلق العالم لحكمة 😑 هي مقالة علمائهم للعلم ان الله يخلق لا لحكمة (الذي يفعل لا لحكمة هو العابث تعالى الله عن ذلك)
https://x.com/i/status/2044462405757833545
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @IC10l. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Anime PFPs 🎌 @are_anime · 37,780 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 31 August 2026
قناة القدرات | منصة همّة @qudrathemma · 34,684 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“المخزن…” (@IC10l), 649 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IC10l.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
