Channel
@IAdequoilire
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
200subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003214896782 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IAdequoilire |
| Description | Bienvenue sur I.A. de quoi lire — l’endroit où l’on parle d’intelligence artificielle sans se débrancher du cerveau. Ici, on lit, on réfléchit, on ironise. Au programme : droits de l’homme, droit d’auteur, libertés numériques etc. |
| Created | 4 November 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IAdequoilire |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 200 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 200 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 4 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
17 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 58.8% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 41.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2025 to 15 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bruno MARKOV, « Le dernier étage du monde », Ed. Anne Carrière, 2023 (également en Poche) Pour venger son père, Victor LAPLACE pénètre le monde des consultants informatiques, et joue avec l'I.A. et les images pour changer la perception de la réalité. Une très belle allégorie de la course de l’Homme pour maîtriser le monde, au style fort agréable.
❤3
I.A. de quoi lire pinned «AVERTISSEMENT - À LIRE EN ARRIVANT ICI - Finalité de ce canal Tous les ouvrages présentés ici ont été préalablement lus par mes soins. J'en ajouterai au fil du temps, essentiellement sur le thème de l'IA face aux libertés individuelles (vidéosurveillance…»
AVERTISSEMENT - À LIRE EN ARRIVANT ICI - Finalité de ce canal Tous les ouvrages présentés ici ont été préalablement lus par mes soins. J'en ajouterai au fil du temps, essentiellement sur le thème de l'IA face aux libertés individuelles (vidéosurveillance, reconnaissance faciale, etc..) et de notre rapport à la réalité (notamment Deepfakes, éthique journalistique, etc.). Les ouvrages ont tous été achetés par moi-même…
👍9❤3
François DUBOIS, « Captionem », Autoédition, 2024 Mystérieusement traquée par des assassins, une jeune femme trouve par hasard refuge dans une ville surgie de nulle part : Captionem. Mais ce sanctuaire n’est qu’un mirage. Cette cité-laboratoire, dissimulée aux yeux du monde, est le terrain d’expérimentation où s’affinent dans l’ombre les méthodes de gouvernance de demain. Ici, intelligence artificielle et dématériali…
👍1
Laura SIBONY, « Fantasia – Contes et légendes de l’I.A. », Éd. Grasset, https://www.grasset.fr/livre/fantasia-9782246833482/. Des récits étonnants, des anecdotes, des informations. Un ouvrage surprenant qui se décline en chapitres courts, thème par thème, et qui s’avère très agréable à lire.
Fabrice MATEO, « La mort de la vie privée – Télésurveillance et données personnelles : le nouvel or noir », Ed. Denoël. https://www.denoel.fr/catalogue/la-mort-de-la-vie-privee/9782207163122 Un ouvrage à portée de tous qui met parfaitement en lumière les différentes facettes de l’utilisation de nos données personnelles, à des fins plus ou moins avouables.
Olivier LASCAR, « Deepfake », Ed. Eyrolles https://www.eyrolles.com/Sciences/Livre/deepfake-9782416017216/ Un panorama assez large et agréablement écrit relatif aux Deefpakes, à leur impact sur la géopolitique. Richement illustré d’exemples sourcés.
❤1
Mathieu LABONDE, Lou MALHURET, Benoît PIÉDALLU, Axel SIMON – « Internet et libertés - 15 ans de combat de la Quadrature du Net », Ed. Vuibert. Cette association à laquelle j'ai souvent fait référence dans mes capsules juridiques, a publié en 2022 un ouvrage rétrospectif des combats menés depuis la création de cette structure. Je salue avec respect leur lutte pour les libertés en matière de vidéosurveillance https://w…
Carole BIENAIMÉ BESSE, « Crépuscule numérique – Quand l’IA bouleverse notre rapport à la vérité », Ed. de l’Observatoire, 2025 https://editions-observatoire.com/livre/Le-Crepuscule-numerique/575 Une réflexion philosophique et sociologique sur la recherche de la Vérité, et les dangers de l’IA qui crée une réalité alternative.
Quand l'IA promeut (et entraîne) le contrôle social, en bridant la démocratie https://korben.info/ia-detruit-institutions-democratie-europe.html Un intéressant article
#vidéosurveillance 4ème de couverture : Drones, logiciels prédictifs, vidéosurveillance algorithmique, reconnaissance faciale: le recours aux dernières technologies de contrôle se banalise au sein de la police. Loin de juguler la criminalité, toutes ces innovations contribuent en réalité à amplifier la violence d'État. Elles referment nos imaginaires politiques et placent la ville sous contrôle sécuritaire. C'est ce…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @IAdequoilire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,032,029 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“I.A. de quoi lire” (@IAdequoilire), 200 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IAdequoilire.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.