Channel
@HyperliquidR
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
101subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003142849486 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HyperliquidR |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HyperliquidR |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 101 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 92 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 92 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 April 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 415 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
10 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 60.0% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
HPC Files Statement in Connection with CFTC Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting https://www.hyperliquidr.xyz/post/hpc-files-statement-in-connection-with-cftc-agricultural-advisory-committee-meeting https://x.com/HyperliquidR/status/2085712924501266871?s=20
HRC and HL Eco are pleased to launch this HYPE Q2 2026 Financials Results Summary. A ~1 min video walking through the most important Hyperliquid metrics and their QoQ growth https://x.com/HyperliquidR/status/2085394398641098765?s=20
❤1
Today, we're excited to release Hyperliquid's 2026 Q2 Report. While Bitcoin fell 14% over the quarter, Hyperliquid pulled further ahead. HYPE returned +79% to a new all-time high, decoupling from the majors for a second straight quarter as the market began to price the business beneath it. More importantly, this was the quarter the rest of finance began to catch up to the "House of All Finance." Real-world markets …
❤1
We just shipped new charts on the HYPE Financials dashboard, built by HL Eco and HRC. You can now track team unlock behavior against modeled vesting schedules and project forward based on how the team has actually behaved to date. https://x.com/GLC_Research/status/2084664827532767315?s=20 https://hl.eco/financials/supply/team-unlocks
👍1
Trade[XYZ] continues to hit new highs. The 7-day EMA just reached a new ATH at 50.7%, the 14-day EMA is now at 47.8%, and the 30-day EMA has climbed to a record 43.3%. Yesterday, Trade[XYZ] also accounted for more than 65% of Hyperliquid's total volume. The data speaks for itself. https://x.com/HyperliquidR/status/2082805725546336489?s=20
Hey guys, we've just published our new $HYPE Financial Dashboard - Made by HRC and HL Eco. Have a look, it's great. Hyperliquid. https://x.com/HyperliquidR/status/2082119100629668256?s=20
🥰2🔥1
HPC and Phantom Ask the CFTC to Make Room for Onchain Market Infrastructure "We can modernize our financial infrastructure without giving up the protections that intermediaries have historically been tasked to provide. Self-custody and transparent onchain systems let us build those protections into the technology itself while regulated intermediaries keep responsibility for the things technology cannot solve on its…
"I used to be a hater of Hyperliquid. The first time I started learning about it was at the beginning of 2024, and it didn't click. Just some perp DEX on Arbitrum (like there were dozens of them elsewhere) with heavy centralization issues, closed-source node code, etc." "This essay is about exactly how Hyperliquid is different, not only from perp DEXes and CEXes, but also from almost every other protocol in this spa…
Using FDV to value $HYPE doesn't make much sense. We've been pretty vocal about this for a long time, yet we still see people relying on FDV over and over again. We're glad Hyperliquid Strategies has released a framework explaining how they calculate the Outstanding Token Supply (OTS) of HYPE, and we're happy to have contributed to the discussion. https://x.com/HyperliquidR/status/2066506931649355959?s=20
We're glad to share that Hyperliquid Strategies just shared their first Hyperliquid's article through HRC. Link of the X article here: https://x.com/HyperliquidR/status/2057796036114977157?s=20
❤3
2026 Trade[XYZ] Q1 Report Last week, HRC published the Hyperliquid 2026 Q1 Report. This week, we're following up with XYZ because the mission to reduce information asymmetry doesn't stop at Hyperliquid itself. Billions in daily volume, genuine weekend price discovery, and two major macro stress events later, this is no longer just a successful product launch. "It points to a structural shift in how global markets …
❤1
HRC x Shaunda Devens See you guys on Tuesday for a joint report. https://x.com/HyperliquidR/status/2052672676821373397?s=20
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HyperliquidR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 270,214 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hyperliquid Research Collective (HRC)” (@HyperliquidR), 101 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HyperliquidR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.