Channel
@HurryTradeX
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
209subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002295871956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HurryTradeX |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HurryTradeX |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 209 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 209 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 31 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
75 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 33 | 44.0% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 17.3% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 26 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
As per my last thorough analysis, 67k was indeed the local top. I may update my long-term analysis if BTC hits 48k in Summer before the actual expected time in October. But as I told you before, the low at 59k was only a local one. I will update you if I see any new opportunities but I think the end of a quarter is a time to be cautious.
👍4🥰1
Signed hurrynft
The target at 66-67k has been reached this week. I closed my long positions, however I didn't open any short positions here as I think that BTC might spend some time around 65k before going up or down. My base scenario is a slightly bullish summer with no new higher high (above 83k) and a lower low around 48k or slightly lower in October-November 2026 as you already know. I will update you if I see any new opportunit…
❤10🥰1
Signed hurrynft
JUST IN: Jim Cramer says Bitcoin and gold are "bad money" being liquidated for SpaceX's IPO. @WatcherGuru
🔥1
Signed hurrynft
Buying signal :)
🔥2
Signed hurrynft
Bitcoin HTF-LTF Update https://x.com/HurryNFT/status/2063793850624221496
❤3
Signed hurrynft
another visit to the EMA. Let's break it BTC, go go go
❤2
Signed hurrynft
If you have a position for the bounce, de-risk it below 62500, the EMA.
👍2
Signed hurrynft
Since 74k, Bitcoin hasn't managed to break above the 30-min EMA50 which is currently just below 63k. Unless it breaks out, the suffering will continue. It will either 1) sweep 60k and bounce 2) go down until 54k it If it breaks out, it may first target 66-67k, then 70-71k.
🔥2
Signed hurrynft
0.786 lost, 0.886 (62600) is next. If BTC loses 61k, it will most probably go straight down to 54k
🔥2👍1
Signed hurrynft
Usually we have a local top or bottom at the beginning of each month. This might be the case here. I think the position is looking good so far, but yeah a lower entry would be better.
👍4
Signed hurrynft
As I previously expected BTC was unable to go past the 200-day SMA but unfortunately I was very busy with other stuff that I missed the short opportunity. Now I think, a long opportunity arose. The first point to try it is here with a SL below 64-65k. And if it doesn't work, I wouldn't expect BTC to go below the 200W SMA at 61,830 at this period of the year. That could be the second opportunity to go long if BTC goes…
👍8
Signed hurrynft
Bitcoin is at a critical resistance. If it breaks above the previous local high here, it can move up to the 100W SMA at 88k. I doubt if it is going to move higher this year.
🔥3
Signed hurrynft
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @HurryTradeX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HurryTrade” (@HurryTradeX), 209 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HurryTradeX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.