Channel
@HunterBrigade
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
237subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002200195607 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HunterBrigade |
| Description | @HunterFolders, @HuntergadeBot. |
| Created | 12 June 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HunterBrigade |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 237 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 237 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 12 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2024 to 21 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ㅤ ㅤㅤ 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗡𝗘𝗫𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗥'𝘀 𝗕𝗘𝗡𝗝𝗔𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗢 BENJAMINO's : FACT-FINDING A house with the umbra of their vigorous strength in each division and their respective duties and that is a blessing that is passed down, like an honor on the sharpness of a sword. ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ “Resolute scout, relentless hunter, family find…
👍1
#BonaBirthdayGirl
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 〔TODAY'S BIRTHDAY GIRL〕 95'sㅤㅤ|ㅤㅤʼ김지연ㅤ ┄──┄──┄───┄ ( .. 📱 .. ) ┄───┄──┄──┄ On August 19th, the popular website birthdaygirl.site buzzed with excitement as visitors cast their votes for the day's honorary Birthday Girl. Among the contenders, one name rose to the top: Bona. With more than a dozen enthusiastic supporters, Bona clinched th…
THE ROYAL FAMILY───?’) : Simulatenous the macrocosmos beyond delicate cherry blossoms grace the majestic mountains furthermore the tranquil sea paraphernalias its gentle euphonious, unfolds a captivating commentaries of a noble──lineage. ㅤ 10.0 ──┼ ( 📖｡ I.E ) KNOX—OUTS ㅤ 大地を彩る王家: II. THE DUKE OF HILLS ㅤ Echoes Surveillance Thunderbird It’s the tale of the esteemed Royal Family of Japan, approximate this s…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Hi hunters, we’re still active okay. If you want to unsubscribe this channel, don’t forget to confirm it through our bot @HuntergadeBot. Thank you.
Sticker, posted without a caption
One.. Two.. Let’s rock the world! Amidst our concern on this exciting day, we are looking for someone who can take care of us and help us in certain difficulties. We are looking for a EDITING MANAGER to help us reach our stars immediately. We need someone who is an expert in their field, dependable in their knowledge, able to collaborate, responsive and open to discussing specific topics, and, of course, engaged in o…
Sticker, posted without a caption
#FE3O4_STICKOUT
ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ﹙𝐅𝐞𝟑𝐎𝟒 : 𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐊 𝐎𝐔𝐓﹚.. 🩹💔 ㅤㅤㅤ𝐌𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐲𝐦𝐛𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐞 𝐚 ㅤㅤ '𝐅𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐛𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐦𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐯𝐞𝐬.' ‹ 𖥔 ࣪ ˖ ✉️ — New beginning of a superb story that has been too long, the hunger to get out of this brutality makes it bizzare but they don't dominate the toil in the appalling ruthless world. Whilst narrating the outset of it being #𝐒𝐞𝐞𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐭, recurring queries keep on frightenly. Who dropped the stars? And... Who's
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @HunterBrigade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 797,300 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@HunterBrigade named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hunter Brigade: The Chronicle Federation.” (@HunterBrigade), 237 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HunterBrigade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.