Channel
@HumanismGlobal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001658035071 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HumanismGlobal |
| Description | We bring awareness to humans locally, nationally, globally. We strongly believe that all humans matter. Let's raise human values around the globe and inspire all generations for a better world for us all. Together We Are Strong! See pinned message! |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HumanismGlobal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 16 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 16 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
18 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 33.3% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 27.8% | |
| 😘 | 3 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2024 to 23 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
EPISODE 181: Familiarity Breeds Contempt Is this statement true? Is it fact that familiarity breeds contempt? What can we do to prevent this from happening? Why is this topic worthwhile discussing? In this episode Kathi and Daisy reveal some insights that is oftentimes overlooked in life and relationships overall.
EPISODE 180 ADMIRATION Admiration? What is admiration? What do you admire? Do you express your admiration? When? How? Why? In this episode Kathi and Daisy speak about admiration and why it is so important to the human experience.
🥰2❤1🤩1
EPISODE 179-COHABITATION What does cohabitation mean? When do humans cohabitate out of need, social norms, casual liking? In this episode Kathi and Daisy speak about cohabitation and how to make it work the best way possible for all.
EPISODE 178 - THE BLAME GAME Do you blame? Do you blame a lot? Do you blame regularly? What is your blame game? In this episode Kathi and Daisy speak about the Blame Game and how to get out of it.
EPISODE 177- ARGUMENT What are arguments? Are you arguing a lot? Do you know what an argument is? How do you feel about arguments? What if some arguments are only discussions about topics where you can agree to not agreeing? In this episode Kathi and Daisy speak about arguments and how to argue with dignity without taking it personally.
EPISODE 176 - FEELING REJECTED Do you feel rejected sometimes or maybe often? What meaning do you give the feeling of being rejected? Kathi and Daisy discuss this topic gently and their insights are a helpful guide.
EPISODE 175 - ROMANTIC BEHAVIOR Do you long for romantic behavior? What is romantic behavior? How do you define romantic behavior? In this episode Kathi and Daisy speak about romantic behavior and how to get more of it when that is something important to you.
EPISODE 174 - DIGNITY What is dignity? How do you define dignity? Where is dignity present and when? In this episode Kathi and Daisy discuss the much needed awareness of dignity and how we can increase dignity in our lives.
EPISODE 173 - IN LOVE What is "in love"? Who is in love? How can someone be in love? Why are we in love? How can we be in love? Or is it about being in the state of love itself? What is love in the first place and how do we define love? In this episode Kathi and Daisy discuss this topic and reveal subjective insights.
EPISODE - 172 POWER PLAY Do you do power play? When? Where? With whom? Are others playing power play with you or do you observe that behavior in your environment. In this episode Kathi and Daisy discuss what Power Play is and how to stop engaging in it.
EPISODE NO. 171 THE POWER OF NO What does "No" mean to you? Is it a powerful statement or is it rather a "maybe"? Is a "No" to you something you can respect? Is it easier for you to respect someone else's "No" or is it easier for you to respect your own "No"? In this episode Kathi and Daisy discuss the power of "No".
🥰2❤1👍1🔥1
It’s not about right or wrong. We all have different perspectives. Es geht nicht um „richtig“ oder „falsch“. Wir alle haben verschiedene Sichtweisen. Nem lényeges hogy kinek van igaza. Mindenkinek más a szemszöge. 🤍🫶
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HumanismGlobal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 126,542 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Humanism.Global” (@HumanismGlobal), 16 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HumanismGlobal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.