Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Huma Finance

@HumaFinance

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

49subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001941624085
TypeChannel
Username@HumaFinance
DescriptionOfficial website:https://huma.finance Twitter:https://x.com/humafinance @HumaFinance Selling this username @Noszk Telegram contact
Created25 April 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/HumaFinance

Growth

497 August 2026 — 49 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48–50 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 12:1549no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:1449first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 25 April 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Videos
1
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
50m 38s
Average length
50m 38s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 1 post, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
330.0%
👍330.0%
🌚110.0%
👎110.0%
💩110.0%
🤬110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2023 to 7 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jun 2024, 15:28 UTC≈9,580 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

租赁波场能量可以节省大量TRX 🔋能量是波场转账的矿工费,没有能量直接使用钱包转账会消耗自己的 TRX 作为转账的手续费(如果没有能量,需要消耗13.5TRX或者27TRX的手续费,非常昂贵) 🔋服务器24小时运行,无需人工干预,能量自动秒到 🔋转账2TRX=得到65,000 能量 🔋转账3.8TRX=得到131,000 能量 🔋转账30TRX=得到1,000,000能量 🔋转账300TRX=得到10,000,000能量 能量下单地址【点击一下地址自动复制】 TXn74nUGwhs7PH42JKi9umMMzXkcYn3Z5Y ——————————————— Leasing TRON energy can save a lot of TRX 1. Energy is the mining fee for TRON transfers. Without energy, directly using the wallet t

3👍3🌚1👎1💩1🤬1

7 Jun 2024, 15:09 UTC≈9,410 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://fragment.com/username/humafinance

7 Jun 2024, 15:06 UTC≈9,060 viewsread 10 August 2026

@HumaFinance Selling this username @Noszk Telegram contact

26 Apr 2023, 00:03 UTC≈8,550 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

In April's Call for HUMAnity we invited Jia to the stage, who is launching a pool on the Huma Protocol soon. Jia brings real-world asset returns to crypto investors while tackling the multi-trillion-dollar credit gap in emerging markets.

25 Apr 2023, 23:51 UTC≈8,510 viewsread 10 August 2026

Huma Finance is the Best Project Built on Superfluid, which allows users to borrow against their future income streams without collateralization

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @HumaFinance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 191,425 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Huma Finance” (@HumaFinance), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HumaFinance.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.