Video, posted without a caption
❤3

Channel
@HuffDaddysCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
231subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001599476449 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HuffDaddysCalls |
| Description | https://t.me/HuffsChatroom ETH - @GemFinderHuff https://twitter.com/0x_Huff |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HuffDaddysCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 231 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:49 | 231 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 13 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
27 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 14 | 51.9% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 25.9% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 14.8% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2023 to 2 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
❤3
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x6eBAde7Ea56b6eFc2106549c047d1FaEc4BDF89C good bottomed out entry on this and r/r. Good name could pick up steam and send with this meta, web and more info just dropped as well supposedly picking up some marketing - @degencoinportal
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x4098dd84ec78b5feb20bf64ce40918c5fc431d17 aped here looks interestting - good web https://www.memesupreme.org/
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xbea025614abaabc7ae925503faf2bf975e758c63 https://t.me/EverythingAppERC X - The Everything App reversing hard rn - Elon spoke about X and said “my goal is to create X, The Everything App” seeing a ton of Twitter news articles picking this up, narrative is super strong could see this sending hard once it gets into price discovery. Better name then the other too whi…
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xbea025614abaabc7ae925503faf2bf975e758c63 Aped this like the name better then the other one as Elons referred to x before as “the everything app” https://t.me/EverythingAppERC https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1577428272056389633?s=46&t=gsqRdXqY8-uRE0at6LsyFg
🔥1🤮1🥰1
First call in a while and its sendoring sers, almost 10x 10k-100k and its going nice and quietly too https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x9b33929e2403be3738b70128d58bf6ecbdca52ef
🔥3
Gambled on this fresh launch A pups journey $JRNY on the bottom here, 1/1 tax locked a month and listed on shiba swap 2e / 1mo lock.. looks interesting to me - 9k - https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x9b33929e2403be3738b70128d58bf6ecbdca52ef - https://t.me/JRNY_Official - apupsjourney.io
❤1👍1🔥1
K9 very over sold IMO here for a variety of reasons, some being people rotating fomoing into $RINIA and $NEYMA, as well as team being barely late on a weekly update post? (Lol) $K9 perfectly fits this Shib fud meta as well, people seem to forget it goes Doge > Shib > K9.. When the others lose hype and die out, K9 will still be kicking - Website: k9token.com - Intropaper: https://k9token.com/K9%20Introductory%20Paper.…
👍3
Been waiting for a good time to post Vyper / $VY but its breaking out hard and doesn’t look like it wants to slow down. First of its kind contract built with vyper (written in Vyper code, which is a minimalist, lightweight alternative to Solidity) instead of solidity, and everyone knows first movers with new tokenomics send hard. Looks like a good one to accumulate at dips. 0% tax burnt lp as well. Lot of chads invol…
🔥3👍1
Well $SHEP is in pure discovery, 22x from initial call and looks like holders have grown stronk af. Some chadly wallets have been accumulating including one guy who hit shib early and scaled 700 eth (https://etherscan.io/token/0x95aD61b0a150d79219dCF64E1E6Cc01f0B64C4cE?a=0x9a1bebfb960903ad1afa7aea3be46c66bd2c8605) and a bayc holder, as well as other mixed whales. Dev recently burnt liq as well and has used relatively…
🔥1
K9 touched 1.3m and holding around $1M, no ones surprised though cause it goes Doge > Shib > K9 - don’t get outpriced sers. In since 5k and haven’t even approved yet, 10m wit haste 🤝 - Website: k9token.com - Intropaper: https://k9token.com/K9%20Introductory%20Paper.pdf - Twitter: https://twitter.com/K9TokenOfficial - Chart: https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xec223245a62d6afca048f8edb9504a3b09ec85cb
🔥2
K9 Buy! 🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾 Spent: $7,614.44 (4.46 WETH) Got: 953,063,880,581 K9 Buyer Position: New! Holder Count: 406 Price: 0.000000007989 (0.000000000004680 WETH) MCap: $798,943 TX | Chart | Buyer | Uniswap | Buy Ad: $OPTIMUS ELON’S ROBOT
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @HuffDaddysCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@HuffDaddysCalls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Huff Daddy's Calls” (@HuffDaddysCalls), 231 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HuffDaddysCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.