https://jmail.world/wiki

Channel
House of Grift
@HouseOfGrift
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001865615152 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HouseOfGrift |
| Description | Grift - A money-making operation that is either dishonest and takes advantage of people, or is simply a cause of annoyance or scorn to those who pay. Come join us as we expose the Grifters! |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HouseOfGrift |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 4 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 253
- Videos
- 37
- Links
- 270
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 4m 58s
- Average length
- 2m 29s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 36.8% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2024 to 15 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
This kind of behavior seriously undermines originality and integrity. What we're seeing is a network of people who share and amplify each other's content, creating a false sense of credibility. This misleads the public into thinking these individuals are far more accomplished than they really are. Additionally, there are those who deceitfully solicit money by giving the impression that they've been involved in sign…
👍1
824. Digital Soldiers Influence Network NOTE: I did major research on this list back when it was brand new, the We The Media group has gone thru lots of changes over the years. I am sure some new ones have come and some have gone. I will not try and update this list since when I researched it, they were at the peak of their game and others were documenting the massive list of characters too. This may not be EVER…
👍1
https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2025/09/us-secret-service-dismantles-imminent-telecommunications-threat-new-york
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
Take me back to the 80’s https://x.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1948890830401667304
Video, posted without a caption
👏1
https://rumble.com/v6v1dj1-sheep-no-more-eyedropmedia.html This is an exceptional video to WATCH 👀
👍2
House of Grift pinned «This guy 👆🏼👆🏼 Always pratting on about grifters. Naming and shaming 🙄 Yet.. It’s okay to do Zactly the same thing while denying it. This guy is a classic to who Q refers to in the above drop. Don’t buy from the grifters he is hating on, buy his stuff,…»
This guy 👆🏼👆🏼 Always pratting on about grifters. Naming and shaming 🙄 Yet.. It’s okay to do Zactly the same thing while denying it. This guy is a classic to who Q refers to in the above drop. Don’t buy from the grifters he is hating on, buy his stuff, it’s better quality, blah, blah, blah. This dude also considers himself an “influencer”, yeah, nah, I’ll pass on your flip, flopping, I’m awesome, bullshit buddy 🙄…
My goal at @ConsciousStrength is to: 1) Destroy Big Pharma & grifty influencer propaganda 2) Make supplement products that are kickass, and don't break the bank like other online brands Most supplements promoted by influencers online are overpriced. I ain't about that life. https://t.me/ConsciousStrength/223
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HouseOfGrift. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@DenisesLists · 6022 postsEagles-Talon🦅🇺🇸🍑
@AlfredDubay · 1201 postQuestion Everything
@gratefulpatriot · 1,5841 postJordan Sather
@jordansather · 48,6021 postGeneral Flynn ️
@RealGenFlynn · 152,6301 postThe Scroll of Benjamin
@TheScrollOfBenjamin · 5011 postTifaniesweT 🇨🇭
@TifaniesweT · 4,4441 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“House of Grift” (@HouseOfGrift), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HouseOfGrift.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.