Channel
@Holistic369Health
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
712subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001170479369 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Holistic369Health |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Holistic369Health |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 712 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 713 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 713 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 133 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
35 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 | 31 | 88.6% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
There's a mushroom growing quietly on dying hardwood trees that's become the fastest-growing category in natural health, and it's not because of hype. In 2023, a randomized, placebo-controlled study found people performed measurably faster on a standard cognitive test just 60 minutes after a single dose. I broke down what the research actually shows, including the studies that didn't find an effect, and why most bo…
Signed Zane Sampson
Of every mushroom 🍄 studied on Earth, Lion's Mane is the only one shown to produce compounds that cross the blood-brain barrier and directly stimulate nerve growth factor synthesis, the same growth signal your body uses to build new neurons. It does this through two entirely separate compound families: hericenones from the visible fruiting body, and erinacines from the mycelium underneath, each working through a dif…
🏆1
Signed Zane Sampson
The FDA's own director was asked how many chemicals in your food were never reviewed by his agency. His answer: "No one knows." Not an estimate. Not a range. No one knows. That's the actual quote from the man running food chemical safety at the FDA in 2026. A legal loophole called self-affirmed GRAS lets food companies certify their own ingredients as safe with zero outside review before they go into your food. 99%…
🏆2
Signed Zane Sampson
I keep thinking about the exact moment in this case where Big Food's lawyers stopped defending their product and started defending their odds. They didn't argue the baby food was safe. They argued that no parent could prove, down to a precise number, how much toxic metal it took to cause the harm. If you can't measure it exactly, the thinking goes, you can't win. A judge looked at that argument and rejected it outr…
🏆2
Signed Zane Sampson
In February 2026, the president signed an executive order invoking emergency powers originally designed for wartime material shortages, to accelerate production of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup. Quietly built into that order was legal immunity for the companies producing it. Four months later, the Supreme Court reinforced that shield. In a 7-2 ruling, the justices decided that if the EPA never require…
🏆3
Signed Zane Sampson
The FDA's own food chemical safety director just said, on the record, that nobody at the agency actually knows how many chemicals are in your food. Mark Hartman, the FDA's director for food chemical safety, told an industry conference plainly: "No one knows" how many food ingredients have been introduced under the agency's "generally recognized as safe" pathway without ever undergoing FDA review. cen.acs Let that s…
🏆2
Signed Zane Sampson
Your health searches are not private. Most people assume they are, and that assumption is exactly what makes this profitable. HIPAA protects what you tell a doctor. It does not protect your fertility tracker, your symptom checker, or the search you typed at 2am when you couldn't sleep. The FTC has said this outright: the vast majority of consumer health data lives completely outside that protection. This isn't spec…
🏆1
Signed Zane Sampson
The government just admitted, in a legal settlement, that a major chemical company knowingly discharged "forever chemicals" into the water supply for years. Chemours agreed to pay $450 million to settle claims tied to illegal PFAS discharges, in the first-ever federal settlement of its kind against a forever-chemical manufacturer. washingtonpost PFAS chemicals don't break down. They don't leave your body easily. Th…
🏆2
Signed Zane Sampson
If you still trust the healthcare system by default, you have not seen the numbers. In one year, the Department of Justice recovered $5.7 billion in healthcare fraud settlements under the False Claims Act — part of a record $6.8 billion in total fraud across industries. Nearly 80% of that healthcare money came from cases started by whistleblowers who finally got tired of watching patients and taxpayers be exploited.…
🏆2
Signed Zane Sampson
Most of the adults in this audience already feel inflation long before they ever see it on a chart. You feel it in groceries, medical bills, and the sinking feeling that you’re running just to stay in place. The dollar has been losing purchasing power your entire life. The Federal Reserve calls 2–4% inflation “stability.” Banks pay you less than that on your savings and call it “service.” Deep down, you already know…
🏆2
Signed Zane Sampson
There is a government program most Americans have never heard of. It is called the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and it has been quietly paying out claims since 1988. Here is what the program's own data shows: Nearly 29,000 people have filed vaccine injury claims. Over 12,000 of those claims have been compensated. The total paid out is approaching $5 billion. The largest single payout was $101 mill…
🏆2
Signed Zane Sampson
Here’s the part most people will never hear from the platform itself... These systems are not “neutral tools” that just happen to show you a few extra wellness ads. They are surveillance machines built to study you. They watch which symptoms make you stop scrolling. They log which words spike your heart rate. They test which promises you are most likely to click when you are tired, afraid, or desperate for answers…
🏆1🆒1
Signed Zane Sampson
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Holistic369Health. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,408,368 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Holistic Health Ascension - Zane Sampson 🧬” (@Holistic369Health), 712 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Holistic369Health.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.