Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Hɪsᴛᴏʀʏ Tᴇʟᴇɢʀᴀᴍ

@History_Oficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

368subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002474411911
TypeChannel
Username@History_Oficial
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/History_Oficial

Growth

368369368.57 August 2026 — 369 subscribers7 August 2026 — 369 subscribers13 August 2026 — 368 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 368–369 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:08368-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:55369no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:48369first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.8%
avg views ÷ 368 subscribers
Avg views / post
132
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total923
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 8 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
718.9%
🤝718.9%
513.5%
💯513.5%
25.41%
🔥25.41%
🙈25.41%
🆒12.70%
👀12.70%
👍12.70%
😍12.70%
😨12.70%
🤯12.70%
🫡12.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC634 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

En 1713, nacía la Real Academia Española, una de las instituciones lingüísticas más importantes del mundo hispanohablante El 3 de agosto de 1713 fue fundada en Madrid por iniciativa de Juan Manuel Fernández Pacheco, con el propósito de velar por el buen uso y la unidad del idioma español. Su lema, "Limpia, fija y da esplendor", sintetizó desde sus orígenes la misión de estudiar, preservar y actualizar la lengua. A

1😍1🆒1

1 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC83 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

𝗘𝗽𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗲𝘁𝗼, 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗅ó𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗅𝗈 𝖨 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗌ó 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖽 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗅𝖺 é𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗂ó 𝖾𝗇 𝗌𝗎𝗌 𝖣𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖺𝖼í𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗅𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗎𝖼𝗍𝖺. 𝖤𝗉𝗂𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗎𝗏𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗅 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗅𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗓𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇 𝗅𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗉𝖼𝗂ó𝗇 𝖽𝖾 𝗍á𝖼𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗀𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇 𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗂ó𝗇 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗂𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽, 𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗉𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗒 𝖾𝗅 𝖼𝖺𝗋á𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋. 𝖴𝗇𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾

3💯2👀1🔥1🤝1

5 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,190 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📖 𝗘𝗻 1687, 𝘀𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗯𝗮 𝗽𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗮 𝘃𝗲𝘇 𝗣𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗶æ 𝗡𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗶𝗮 𝗠𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮, 𝘂𝗻𝗮 𝗱𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝘀 𝗼𝗯𝗿𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁í𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘀 𝗺á𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗹𝘂𝘆𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗲 𝗹𝗮 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗮 El 5 de julio de 1687 Isaac Newton dio a conocer este trabajo, conocido simplemente como Principia. En sus páginas formuló las leyes del movimiento y desarrolló la ley de gravitación universal, sentando las bases de la física clásica. La obra propuso un marco matemático p

🤝211💯1

5 Jul 2026, 02:20 UTC≈1,140 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧬 Durante siglos se creyó que Giovanni y Francesco de Médici habían sido víctimas de un envenenamiento con arsénico. Ahora, el análisis de su ADN antiguo ha resuelto el misterio: ambos murieron de malaria. 🦟 Además de descartar una de las grandes teorías del Renacimiento, los investigadores han identificado una variante desconocida de Plasmodium falciparum, el parásito responsable de la forma más grave de esta enfer

111🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @History_Oficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 784,278 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hɪsᴛᴏʀʏ Tᴇʟᴇɢʀᴀᴍ” (@History_Oficial), 368 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/History_Oficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.