29 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC130 viewsread 8 August 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2082444979947835814
Channel
A History of Central Banking
@HistoryCentralBanking
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
926subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001381014281 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HistoryCentralBanking |
| Description | A History of Central Banking and The Enslavement of Mankind by Stephen Mitford Goodson |
| Created | 30 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HistoryCentralBanking |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 926 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 926 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 12 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 22.9%
- avg views ÷ 926 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 212
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (12 August 2024 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 424 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 73
- Videos
- 9
- Links
- 36
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 4m 53s
- Average length
- 1m 13s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
17 Jul 2026, 04:42 UTC294 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video
Video, posted without a caption
6 Mar 2026, 19:21 UTC891 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video
Video, posted without a caption
6 Feb 2026, 15:40 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 8 August 2026
https://t.me/voxday_official/4337
2 Jan 2026, 09:09 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
17 Dec 2025, 20:06 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bullionbitcoinbsPhoto
Photo, posted without a caption
29 Sept 2025, 10:00 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
2 Aug 2025, 14:29 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 8 August 2026
https://youtu.be/StTKHskg5Tg?si=7UcQ5f9vBh62q9f_
31 Jul 2025, 10:38 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 8 August 2026
https://x.com/alizaeteri/status/1950646773585707082?t=AvaOomWssuHc0qpYOYDrrg&s=09 Oh no, not you too, American Cancer Society
23 Jul 2025, 02:49 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
The nature of technology is deflationary....prices should be falling everywhere and always. But they are not. Why might you think this is?
15 Jul 2025, 19:26 UTC952 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Central Banks will never give up their mission to control the money, for if you control that, you have the levers of world power in your hands. The ECB is talking about Central Bank Digital Currencies again. https://x.com/BitsagaRob/status/1945180493126803704/photo/1
13 Jul 2025, 17:42 UTC800 viewsread 8 August 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sJnIctsQg4 Thomas DiLorenzo lays it out. The Mises institute is good source on such controversial matters.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @HistoryCentralBanking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“A History of Central Banking” (@HistoryCentralBanking), 926 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HistoryCentralBanking.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.