Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🇨🇭Denke selbst🇨🇭

@Hinterfrage_alles

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

153subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001451146573
TypeChannel
Username@Hinterfrage_alles
DescriptionCorona Gegendarstellung Hier findest du viele wissenschaftliche Beweise, Basics und MSM-Artikel, welche aussagen, dass wir Menschen belogen und betrogen werden. Auch Absurditäten haben Platz!
Created20 July 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Hinterfrage_alles

Growth

1536 August 2026 — 153 subscribers8 August 2026 — 153 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 152–154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 19:15153no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:34153first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
no view readings in window
Avg views / post
no view readings
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 May 20253 August 2026)
Views total
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,560
Videos
1,920
Links
6,480

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
32m 50s
Average length
10m 57s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
133.3%
💯133.3%
🔥133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 22:27 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

26 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

17 Jul 2026, 05:27 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

27 Jun 2025, 06:59 UTC345 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @naranjasystem

Big Data war gestern 🍊 Wer dem System nicht mehr kuschen will, registriert seine Webseiten über eine anonyme LLC in Wyoming (USA) – rechtssicher, ausserhalb EU-Zugriff. 👉 Trete der NARANJA-CLOUD bei und erhalte kostenlos Zugriff auf diese und viele weitere Autonomie-Tools: – 100 GB Cloudspeicher – auf Schweizer Proton-Infrastruktur – in einem militärischen Bunker (Schweizer Jura) – inkl. Hilfe bei sicherem Setup,

16 May 2025, 22:04 UTC310 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hallo2Qmin

UND NEIN – DAS NARANJA-SYSTEM IST KEINE PHILOSOPHIE #1024. Nicht noch eine Idee. Nicht noch ein Konzept. Nicht noch ein „Wäre schön wenn…“ 1024 steht für Überfluss ohne Klarheit. 2 hoch 10. Zu viele Dateien. Zu wenig Wahrheit. Zu viele Konzepte. Kein Fundament. Das Naranja-System ist kein Konzept – es ist in der Umsetzung. Die Basis wurde in den letzten Tagen realisiert. Der Kern, die NARANJA-CLOUD läuft – geschüt

1

16 May 2025, 22:04 UTC198 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hallo2Qmin

KEINE KI-REDAKTION. SONDERN EIN SYSTEMWECHSEL. Manche von euch haben gewartet. Auf die angekündigte KI-Redaktion. Auf strukturierte News, kuratierte Tiefe, tägliche Aufklärung. Doch es ist anders gekommen. Weil etwas Grösseres passiert ist. 1. Die NARANJA-CLOUD ist entstanden. Eine Infrastruktur für Datenhoheit, Bewusstseinsarbeit und Tokenisierung. Die Testumgebung ist bereits live und somit ist der Anfang vom En

10 May 2025, 03:52 UTC123 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Aufwachkanal_deine_rote_PilleVideo

‼️ Sasha Latypova und James Roguski enthüllen, wie der PREP Act – ein perfides US-Gesetz von 2005 – als Freibrief für Pharmakonzerne dient, um ohne jede Haftung tödliche und ungetestete Produkte auf die Menschheit loszulassen. Notstandslügen ersetzen Rechtsstaatlichkeit. Ihr Appell: Aufwachen, Widerstand leisten und dieses kriminelle Gesetz endgültig stürzen! Quelle Übersetzung & Stimmen 🎙 Joska Ramelow 🎙 D

10 May 2025, 03:52 UTC109 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @philippkruse

https://youtu.be/W2sXKsd9R2I?si=OmpA8xkCn0mQ_Y-U

10 May 2025, 03:43 UTC84 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @impfkritischKanalVideo

Sachs: "COVID-19 stammt aus US-Universität" Der US-Ökonom Jeffrey Sachs hat am Samstag einen Live-Podcast mit dem EU-Abgeordneten Fidias Panayiotou in der zypriotischen Hauptstadt Nikosia geführt. Während des Gesprächs erklärte Sachs, dass seiner umfassenden Recherche nach das COVID-19-Virus aus der führenden Forschungseinrichtung im Bereich der Betacoronaviren der US-Universität von North Carolina stamme. Diese ar

8 May 2025, 03:43 UTC72 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hallo2Qmin

Dieser Kanal wird für kurze Zeit nur auf Sparflamme kochen. Warum? Weil ich mit einer KI-Redaktion ein neues Spielfeld betrete. Wer das für Spielerei hält, irrt. In den letzten zwei Monaten habe ich meine KI-Kompetenz von 2 auf 7 hochgefahren – ohne eine Zeile zu programmieren. Dafür mit maximaler Klarheit, was möglich ist: Automatisierte Postings, selektive Kanalbeobachtung, präzise Kommunikation – gesteuert durch

8 May 2025, 03:41 UTC56 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DrMariaHubmerMoggMAHUMOPhoto

🔸️Das Kind hat eine Reaktion auf einen Bienenstich, der Kinderarzt glaubt den Eltern. Das Kind hat eine Reaktion auf Erdnüsse, der Kinderarzt glaubt den Eltern. Das Kind hat eine Reaktion auf ein Antibiotikum, der Kinderarzt glaubt den Eltern. Das Kind reagiert auf einen Impfstoff, und der Kinderarzt verunglimpft die Eltern als "Querdenker". 🔸️ Jedes. Einzelne. Mal.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Hinterfrage_alles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇨🇭Denke selbst🇨🇭” (@Hinterfrage_alles), 153 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hinterfrage_alles.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.