Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Hillel Neuer

@HillelNeuer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

27subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002093184849
TypeChannel
Username@HillelNeuer
DescriptionInternational human rights lawyer, writer, Executive Director of United Nations Watch. BA, BCL, LLB, LLM & Doctor of Law
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 19 March 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/HillelNeuer

Growth

278 August 2026 — 27 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27 subscribers8 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26–28 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 07:1627no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:2127first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 19 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
11
Videos
13
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
22m 16s
Average length
2m 47s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎939.1%
👍730.4%
🔥28.70%
🖕28.70%
14.35%
👌14.35%
😁14.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2024 to 15 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Apr 2024, 23:33 UTC≈2,630 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

.@SecBlinken There is little time left to free Russian dissident Vladimir Kara-Murza, who endures solitary confinement in a Siberian maximum-security prison. His health is in grave danger. We call on you to designate Mr. Kara-Murza as unlawfully detained and secure his freedom.

👍2

15 Apr 2024, 23:32 UTC≈2,580 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

My hometown Montreal was a beautiful city. Great people, great spirit, bilingual, multicultural. But something terrible is going on. In recent months, there were multiple shootings and Molotov cocktails targeting Jewish schools and community centers. Now they openly cheer Sinwar.

👎9🖕2

15 Apr 2024, 23:32 UTC≈1,090 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Remember: the unprecedented assault against Israel was perpetrated by the Islamic Regime in Iran—not the people of Iran who are also subjugated by the same murderous mollahs. Iran has been hijacked by this evil regime. The vast majority in Iran hate the regime and support Israel.

👍51

22 Mar 2024, 20:31 UTC628 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

2/ UNRWA is infested with terorrists. In 2017 Hamas elected to its Politburo Yahya Sinwar as Chair, and also Suhail al-Hindi, head of the UNRWA Gaza staff union and boys school. He was chair of Gaza’s “Great March of Return” border riots that preceded the October 7th attacks.

🔥2😁1

22 Mar 2024, 20:31 UTC458 viewsread 11 August 2026

UNRWA: Hamas Chief Ismail Haniyeh Was One of Our Teachers Ahmad Oueidat, UNRWA’s former Director of Professional Development and Curriculum: “UNRWA has tried to constitute a national platform and a long arm which would enable the Palestinian refugees to obtain their rights and first and foremost the Right of Return.” "But what happened was the [West] saw that UNRWA was raising thousands and thousands of cadres, who

22 Mar 2024, 20:30 UTC265 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

4/ Colonna admitted it: “The aim of this important and delicate mission, entrusted to us by the Secretary General, is to enable donors, the largest among them, but in fact everyone, to regain confidence in the way UNRWA operates, when they have lost it or when they have doubts.”

22 Mar 2024, 20:29 UTC235 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

3/ UN said explicitly that @MinColonna was named not to expose UNRWA wrongdoing and support for terrorism but rather “to reassure donors.” Feb. 21: “This is why he is named Catherine Colonna to do this independent review, to reassure those donors who have who may have doubts.”

22 Mar 2024, 20:29 UTC166 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

2/ Over the past 9 years, when we sent repeated warnings and reports to UNRWA about widespread and systematic support for terrorism among thousands of their staff, UNRWA's response was to disparage and attack us. Spokesman Chris Gunness pressed journalists to ignore the evidence.

22 Mar 2024, 20:28 UTC131 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

Cover-up: Catherine Colonna's “independent review” into UNRWA's support for terrorism is an orchestrated whitewash. She says UNRWA has “serious mechanisms in place to ensure respect for the principle of neutrality.” The opposite is true. 🧵

19 Mar 2024, 08:15 UTC178 viewsread 11 August 2026

Iran's Presidency of the United Nations Conference on Disarmament Testimony delivered before the UN Human Rights Council Mr. President, the United Nations and this Council are charged with protecting the right to life, the right to be free from torture, the rights of women to be treated equally. Today we ask: Is the Council protecting these basic human rights for the people of Iran? In September 2009, we came her

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @HillelNeuer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,051,691 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hillel Neuer” (@HillelNeuer), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HillelNeuer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.