Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for HighD πŸ•Š

Channel

HighD πŸ•Š

@HighDMary

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

6,412subscribers

-212 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001299867815
TypeChannel
Username@HighDMary
Created19 January 2021 β€” measured β€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/HighDMary

Topic

Memes & entertainment β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,4126,6246,5186 August 2026 β€” 6,624 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 6,624 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 6,621 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 6,619 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 6,609 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 6,599 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 6,593 subscribers22 August 2026 β€” 6,601 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 6,591 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 6,587 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 6,583 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 6,571 subscribers6 September 2026 β€” 6,550 subscribers11 September 2026 β€” 6,537 subscribers14 September 2026 β€” 6,521 subscribers19 September 2026 β€” 6,515 subscribers29 September 2026 β€” 6,490 subscribers6 October 2026 β€” 6,481 subscribers12 October 2026 β€” 6,471 subscribers16 October 2026 β€” 6,464 subscribers18 October 2026 β€” 6,458 subscribers21 October 2026 β€” 6,448 subscribers24 October 2026 β€” 6,442 subscribers27 October 2026 β€” 6,436 subscribers30 October 2026 β€” 6,431 subscribers2 November 2026 β€” 6,426 subscribers5 November 2026 β€” 6,418 subscribers8 November 2026 β€” 6,412 subscribers6 August 20268 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 94 days, net -212. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,380–6,656 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 15:056,412-6
5 Nov 2026, 08:266,418-8
2 Nov 2026, 07:186,426-5
30 Oct 2026, 13:416,431-5
27 Oct 2026, 12:566,436-6
24 Oct 2026, 16:306,442-6
21 Oct 2026, 21:016,448-10
18 Oct 2026, 16:576,458-6
16 Oct 2026, 03:166,464-7
12 Oct 2026, 22:546,471-10
6 Oct 2026, 13:016,481-9
29 Sept 2026, 19:586,490-25
19 Sept 2026, 13:186,515-6
14 Sept 2026, 21:586,521-16
11 Sept 2026, 06:416,537-13
6 Sept 2026, 21:216,550-21
2 Sept 2026, 12:536,571-12
30 Aug 2026, 13:386,583-4
28 Aug 2026, 00:086,587-4
25 Aug 2026, 07:426,591first reading

Engagement

121 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
2.65%
avg views Γ· 6,412 subscribers
Avg views / post
170
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.77%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 121 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held121 (1 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total8,499
Reactions total110
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 07:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18m 45s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

345 reactions across 90 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘9427.2%
❀8925.8%
πŸ’―5315.4%
πŸ”₯277.83%
πŸ™205.80%
🀣195.51%
😁174.93%
πŸ‘92.61%
🀬61.74%
❀‍πŸ”₯51.45%
πŸ€”20.58%
πŸ‘Ž10.29%
πŸ•Š10.29%
🀑10.29%
πŸ₯΄10.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 121 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 345 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own β€˜edited’ marker: 1 of 50 posts held from the last 30 days (2.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 04:31 UTC223 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @whichwaywesternwomanPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

❀6πŸ’―1

Signed Sabine E.

5 Nov 2026, 20:07 UTC259 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @whichwaywesternwomanPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

❀2πŸ’―1

Signed Sabine E.

5 Nov 2026, 17:54 UTC296 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Schumann resonance blackout since Nov 2, I wonder what’s going on behind the scenes? 🧐

πŸ€”2πŸ”₯1

Signed Sabine E.

5 Nov 2026, 05:44 UTC304 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🀣

🀣5πŸ‘3

Signed Sabine E.

4 Nov 2026, 22:15 UTC300 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

πŸ™6❀1

Signed Sabine E.

4 Nov 2026, 22:14 UTC283 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❀8

Signed Sabine E.

4 Nov 2026, 22:11 UTC278 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

πŸ‘2❀1

Signed Sabine E.

4 Nov 2026, 21:46 UTC241 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @whichwaywesternwomanPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

πŸ‘2πŸ™2

Signed Sabine E.

4 Nov 2026, 21:45 UTC235 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @whichwaywesternwomanPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

πŸ‘2

Signed Sabine E.

4 Nov 2026, 21:45 UTC232 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @whichwaywesternwomanPhoto

The Color Purple represents illusion, deception, and the manipulation of Light.

πŸ”₯4

Signed Sabine E.

4 Nov 2026, 21:45 UTC227 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @whichwaywesternwomanVideo

Magenta: The colour that doesn't exist When we look at a rainbow, we see a full spectrum of light. Every colour we could imagine. Except one – magenta. Where is it? Well, officially magenta doesn't exist. There is no wavelength of light for magenta, meaning the human brain literally makes it up, but how?

❀2πŸ‘1

Signed Sabine E.

4 Nov 2026, 21:40 UTC242 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @whichwaywesternwoman

Your perception of reality is nothing more than a reflection in your mind influenced by your beliefs, feelings, experiences, limited knowledge…. * The Color Purple represents illusion, deception, and the manipulation of Light. πŸ’™+❀️=πŸ’œ

❀2πŸ‘1

Signed Sabine E.

Showing the 12 most recent of 121 posts we hold for @HighDMary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œHighD πŸ•Šβ€ (@HighDMary), 6,412 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HighDMary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.