Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hermes Protocol - Announcements

Channel

Hermes Protocol - Announcements

@Hermes_Protocol

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

159subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001512283416
TypeChannel
Username@Hermes_Protocol
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 5 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Hermes_Protocol

Growth

158161159.57 August 2026 — 158 subscribers8 August 2026 — 158 subscribers15 August 2026 — 161 subscribers23 August 2026 — 159 subscribers1597 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 158–161 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 02:07159-2
15 Aug 2026, 20:14161+3
8 Aug 2026, 18:01158no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:09158first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 September 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

124 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6250.0%
👍2116.9%
1512.1%
🎉129.68%
👏97.26%
🍾43.23%
🤯10.806%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2021 to 27 June 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jun 2023, 11:21 UTC962 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

We have an exciting video to show you! https://youtu.be/_LShnt7lFRs During Consensus earlier this year, we had an amazing time with the Radix team and our fellow cohort colleague teams. While at the event, we sat down with Piers and had a conversation about what we are building :)

🔥9

24 May 2023, 19:42 UTC737 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Hello everyone! We hope you've all been well! We know it's been a bit quieter around here recently, but trust us, it's been all for good reason. Our commitment to crafting the Business MVP took center stage, as our dedicated team channelled all energies towards making it the best it could be. Don't worry, we haven't forgotten our promise! The whirlwind of 'buidling', integrating, and refining means that we're now g

🔥18

16 Apr 2023, 17:05 UTC736 viewsread 8 August 2026

Don't miss out on these announcements! - RadixScan: https://twitter.com/HermesProtocol/status/1644141448059551747 - Consensus: https://twitter.com/HermesProtocol/status/1644869692538986498 - @RadixWhaleWatch : https://twitter.com/HermesProtocol/status/1645241592083619841 - Radix validator: https://twitter.com/HermesProtocol/status/1645598031797014528 - Ociswap: https://twitter.com/HermesProtocol/status/1646531699113

12 Apr 2023, 23:46 UTC964 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎉 GIVEAWAY WINNERS ANNOUNCED 🎉 Hello Hermes Protocol fam! 👋 We're super excited to announce the winners of our first 5 giveaways from the #HermesProtocolAprilAnnouncements! 🚀 🥁 And the lucky winners are: 1. Giveaway 1 (Radix Integration): 1.1. rdx1qspga6rxnn8ttez9mr3lyd78texs64fmfrtzj4wd587qak2mtk80gps4rexqt 1.2. terra1gze4498fe3r5m06rxgtlg2twx7m7psummph9tx (please connect your Radix wallet to your existing Herme

🔥172

10 Apr 2023, 01:48 UTC434 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://twitter.com/HermesProtocol/status/1645241592083619841 Our 9th 🧵 is out! And it's about Twitter 🐤

9 Apr 2023, 01:11 UTC783 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://twitter.com/HermesProtocol/status/1644869692538986498 Going to Consensus? Visit us!

👍3

5 Apr 2023, 15:32 UTC436 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://twitter.com/HermesProtocol/status/1643636840916721666 Crew3/Zealy thread is finally out! 🎉 🚀🔥

👍2

3 Apr 2023, 01:11 UTC440 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://twitter.com/HermesProtocol/status/1642695180389056515 Our 2nd announcement (of at least 30! 🤯💥) is OUT! Splitting 2k XRD between 3 lucky winners too (stay tuned for the next 🧵 where we'll explain how to participate on each of the giveaways (there will be at least 30 of them!)).

👍12🔥4

2 Apr 2023, 02:45 UTC570 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔥 https://twitter.com/HermesProtocol/status/1642356234631233536 🔥

4👍2

29 Mar 2023, 19:12 UTC449 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎉 Hey everyone! The Radix team just published an awesome article about our project, showcasing the unique value we bring to the Web3 space, and our founders' backgrounds. Make sure to give it a read! 📖 🚨 Also, don't forget to join us for a Twitter Spaces session with Radix on Friday. This is your chance to learn more about our collaboration and get an inside scoop. 📣 🔗 Blog article: https://www.radixdlt.com/blog/me

🔥6👏1

2 Feb 2023, 20:22 UTC556 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Our new website is live! 🥳🎉 https://hermesprotocol.io/ 🚀 We have several new and revamped pages as well :) we hope everyone enjoys this "facelift"!

👏8🎉5🍾3👍1

2 Feb 2023, 19:05 UTC496 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1ypJddAXXmRJW Spaces just started. Come join!

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Hermes_Protocol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hermes Protocol - Announcements” (@Hermes_Protocol), 159 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hermes_Protocol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.