Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

هرات تایمز | بین الملل 🌍

@HeratTimes_INT

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,189subscribers

+10,209 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001158106204
TypeChannel
Username@HeratTimes_INT
Description🌍 جهان بین‌الملل | هرات تایمز از مهم‌ترین تحولات جهان، لحظه‌به‌لحظه باخبر باشید. تحلیل، خبر و گزارش‌های معتبر از سیاست، اقتصاد و امنیت بین‌الملل. www.herattimes.net @Herat
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/HeratTimes_INT

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.

Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@herat8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0014 minutesthis entry (71)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 23 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @HeratTimes_INT — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Views per post sit far above this size band

11,900 average views per post against 14,189 subscribers — an engagement rate of 84.0%. Across the 7,843 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.78% and 17.5%, with a median of 8.82%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (16 July 2026 15 August 2026)
Posts measured48 of 48 published in the window (13 exact, 35 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled571,855
Mature posts only89.8% over 33 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers14,189 measured 14 August 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 7,843 channels · p10 1.64% · p25 3.78% · p50 8.82% · p75 17.5% · p90 29.6%
Position in cohort99.248th percentile · 9.5× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.029% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · err_high, last confirmed 15 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

3,98014,1899,084.57 August 2026 — 3,980 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,980 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,984 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,008 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,528 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,189 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 7 days, net +10,209. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,449–15,720 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:0514,189+3,661
13 Aug 2026, 13:4910,528+6,520
10 Aug 2026, 11:384,008+24
7 Aug 2026, 18:113,984+4
7 Aug 2026, 12:333,980no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:223,980first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
84.0%
avg views ÷ 14,189 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,900
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.023%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held48 (5 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total571,855
Reactions total106
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
329
Videos
70

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 34s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

106 reactions across 32 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4340.6%
😁3028.3%
😭109.43%
👍65.66%
👎65.66%
💔43.77%
🤗43.77%
🫡21.89%
😍10.943%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC≈9,280 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

تیراندازی مرگبار در میشیگان امریکا؛ پنج تن کشته شدند در پی تیراندازی در شمال ایالت میشیگان امریکا، پنج تن کشته و یک نفر دیگر به شدت زخمی شده است. @HeratTimes_INT | هرات تایمز بین الملل

🤗32

15 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC≈9,480 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

کاظم غریب‌آبادی، معاون وزیر خارجه‌ی ایران در واکنش به سخنان جدید دونالد ترامپ، رییس‌جمهور ایالات متحده می‌گوید تنگه‌ی هرمز نه با توییت و نه با ناو هواپیمابر، قلمرو امریکا نخواهد شد. غریب‌آباد امروز (شنبه، ۲۴ اسد) در ایکس نوشت که امریکا باید این واقعیت را بپذیرد که در جنگ با ایران شکست راهبردی و سنگینی را متحمل شده است. او گفته است که تنگه‌ی هرمز «ایرانی بوده، هست و خواهد بود». @HeratTimes_INT | هرات تایمز بین المل

2

15 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC≈11,000 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

مقام‌های اندونیزیا می‌گویند که در پی وقوع زمین‌لرزه‌ای به بزرگی ۷.۷ درجهٔ ریشتر در شرق این کشور، دست‌کم پنج تن جان باخته، شماری دیگر زخمی شده‌اند و حدود دو هزار تن از باشنده‌گان منطقه «ناگکیو» خانه‌های‌شان را ترک کرده‌اند. @HeratTimes_INT | هرات تایمز بین الملل

😭2

15 Aug 2026, 04:14 UTC≈11,700 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ترمپ: تنگه هرمز را به قلمرو امریکا تبدیل می‌کنیم دونالد ترمپ، رئیس‌جمهور امریکا، گفته است که واشنگتن به‌زودی اعلام خواهد کرد تنگه هرمز را به‌عنوان قلمرو امریکا در نظر می‌گیرد؛ اظهاراتی که تنش‌ها بر سر این آبراه حیاتی و مسیر انتقال بخش بزرگی از نفت جهان را افزایش داده است. ترمپ همچنین گفته است امریکا در حال آماده‌سازی اقدامات اقتصادی شدید علیه ایران است. پیش از این، اسکات بسنت، وزیر خزانه‌داری امریکا، هشدار داده بود

😁5

14 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC≈27,400 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

تلویزیون دولتی ایران، گزارش داده است که نیروهای ایرانی یک فروند پهپاد «MQ-9» امریکا را بر فراز ولایت هرمزگان ره‌گیری و منهدم کرده ‌اند. بر بنیاد این گزارش، این پهپاد با استفاده از یک سامانه‌ی دفاعی پیش‌رفته‌ی جدید سپاه پاسداران شناسایی و هدف قرار گرفته است. MQ-9 Reaper، یک پهپاد ساخت امریکا است که برای شناسایی، نظارت و انجام عملیات تهاجمی استفاده می‌شود و در جریان سال‌های گذشته در عملیات نظامی امریکا در منطقه به کا

14 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC≈20,300 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

امارات متحده عربی در پیوند به هدف حمله قرار گرفتن دو نفت‌کش ملی این کشور در تنگه‌ی هرمز، ایران را متهم و محکوم کرد. وزارت خارجه‌ی امارات متحده عربی امروز (جمعه، ۲۳ اسد) با نشر بیانیه‌ای گفته است که ایران نفت‌کش‌های ملی «مومباسا» و «البهیه» را با دو موشک کروز هدف حمله قرار داده است. این وزارت گفته است که کشتی‌های امارات هنگام عبور از آب‌های سرزمینی عمان در تنگه‌ی هرمز مورد اصابت قرار گرفته‌اند. @HeratTimes_INT | هر

3

14 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC≈24,000 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

فرماندهی مرکزی ارتش امریکا (سنتکام) اعلام کرد که قرار است یک نیروی پهپادی چند ملیتی با فرماندهی واحد به رهبری ایالات متحده در خاور میانه ایجاد شود. سنتکام پنج‌شنبه (۲۲ اسد) با نشر بیانیه‌ای گفته است که این واحد پهپادی «فالکون استرایک» نام دارد. در بیانیه‌ی سنتکام آمده است که فالکون استرایک یک نیروی متشکل از سامانه‌های بدون سرنشین در سه محیط (آسمان، سطح دریا و زیر دریا) است. @HeratTimes_INT | هرات تایمز بین الملل

13 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC≈19,600 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

وزارت بهداشت فلسطین، اعلام کرده که در حمله‌های اسرائیل بر بخش‌هایی از غزه، یک تن کشته و هفت تن زخمی شده است. رسانه‌های بین‌المللی، امروز گزارش داده که این فلسطینی‌ها در حمله‌های ۲۴ ساعت گذشته‌ی ارتش اسرائیل بر نوار غزه کشته و زخمی شده اند. با این که اسرائیل و حماس در اکتبر سال گذشته روی برقراری آتش‌بس به توافق رسیدند؛ اما این توافق نیز نتوانسته به حمله‌های این کشور بر غزه پایان دهد. بر بنیاد آمار ارائه‌شده از سوی

1👍1😭1

13 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC≈10,500 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

مجله "فارن افرز" نوشته که مشارکت آمریکا در جنگ‌های بی‌پایان، قدرت واشنگتن را تضعیف می‌کند و در نهایت ایالات_متحده دیگر قادر نخواهد بود "همزمان با همه و در همه‌جا" وارد جنگ شود. @HeratTimes_INT | هرات تایمز بین الملل

2👍2🤗1🫡1

13 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC≈13,500 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

رسانه‌های خارجی خبر داده‌اند در پی سقوط یک فروند چرخ‌بال نظامی در منطقه سالادو در ایالت تگزاس امریکا دو نظامی این کشور کشته شده‌اند. خبرگزاری رویترز گفته که پس از سقوط این چرخ‌بال، آتش‌سوزی در ساحه‌های علفزار اطراف محل حادثه نیز رخ داده است. به گفته منبع چرخ‌بال سقوط‌کرده مربوط به پایگاه نظامی فورت هود امریکا است. تا هنوز علت سقوط این چرخ‌بال مشخص نشده و مقام‌های مربوط در حال بررسی این رویداد هستند. @HeratTimes_

3

13 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC≈13,600 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

یک مقام ارشد ایرانی، می‌گوید که هیچ گفت‌وگویی میان تهران و واشینگتن برای تمدید آتش‌بس در جریان نیست و در تلاش‌های غیرمستقیم برای بازگرداندن امریکا به توافق موقت و تعیین جدول زمانی اجرای تعهدات نیز هیچ پیش‌رفتی حاصل نشده است. خبرگزاری رویترز، بامداد امروز به نقل از این مقام ارشد ایرانی گزارش داده که ایران و امریکا هم‌چنان بر سر تلاش‌ها برای پایان‌دادن به جنگ در خلیج فارس اختلاف دارند. @HeratTimes_INT | هرات تایمز ب

13 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC445 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

حضور نظامی آمریکا در عراق تا پایان سپتامبر 2026 بعد از 23 سال به پایان می رسد آخرین نیروهای آمریکایی تا 30 سپتامبر یعنی ماه آینده از عراق و منطقه کردستان این کشور به طور کامل خارج می شوند. @HeratTimes_INT | هرات تایمز بین الملل

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @HeratTimes_INT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 653,889 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“هرات تایمز | بین الملل 🌍” (@HeratTimes_INT), 14,189 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HeratTimes_INT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.