Channel
@Heliotropea
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
81subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002356234368 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Heliotropea |
| Description | ᴀɴᴀ(ɴᴏᴄᴛɪs)↷ ENTJ — Apollo’s Daughter ⋆F1 ⟮16·3·81⟯ ⋆MotoGP ⟮54·93·73·37⟯ Games | Rock | Cinema | Books | Comics (yapping about whatever I like) ᴜɴᴋɴᴏᴡɴ: @anarenardBot ✦ http://t.me/RedChtBot?start=5435971151 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Heliotropea |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 81 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 81 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (7 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 936 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
27 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5350447146690716427 | 7 | 25.9% | |
| custom 5978674499862667130 | 7 | 25.9% | |
| custom 5317017401886258237 | 4 | 14.8% | |
| custom 5969963077825732499 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5972136142298947512 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5997079663086673233 | 3 | 11.1% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
+ I had a fucked up day, please wish bad things for the person who made it like this! I wish her a tragic death, but you guys can just wish that she steps in poop!
custom 59970796630866732333
Signed 𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗌 (rogue ver)
یه مدت میام مغزتون رو میخورم بعد یه مدت بعدش محو میشم، نمیدونم چی بگم چیکار کنم. انیوی فعلا قفلی زدم روی Ted Lasso... بعدش میام به روال عادی برمیگردم(از دیشب شروعش کردم و اواسط فصل سومم!)
custom 53504471466907164272
Signed 𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗌 (rogue ver)
My fav edit =)
custom 53170174018862582374
Signed 𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗌 (rogue ver)
البته دوستام میتونن تصور کنن چون یک مدت به شدت طولانی(شاید یک سال بیشتر) داشتن عر زدنم رو برای بیلی تحمل میکردن😂
Signed 𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗌 (rogue ver)
حتی نمیتونید تصور کنید من چقدر این بشر رو دوستش دارم.
Signed 𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗌 (rogue ver)
Video, posted without a caption
custom 59699630778257324993
Signed 𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗌 (rogue ver)
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗌 (rogue ver)
آهنگش خیلی رمی کدد بود... الهی بمیرم براش =)
custom 59721361422989475123
Signed 𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗌 (rogue ver)
File, posted without a caption
Signed 𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗌 (rogue ver)
✨ 𝖽𝗈 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗄 𝖨'𝖽 𝗀𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗎𝗉, 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍'𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗈𝗄 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝗆𝖾 𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝖨 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗄? 𝗁𝗈𝗐 𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗄, 𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗀, 𝖨'𝖽 𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝖺𝗌𝗂𝗅𝗒? 𝗇𝗈𝗐 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗂𝗍'𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗇𝖾, 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾'𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝖨 𝗐𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾. 𝗆𝗒 𝗅𝗂𝖿𝖾 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗆, 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖨 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗇, 𝗁𝗈𝗐 𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝖨 𝖿𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗇𝗒 𝗁𝗎𝗋𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖾? 𝖨𝖿 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗄𝖾𝖽 𝗆𝖾 𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖽 𝖨'𝗅𝗅 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗅 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗎𝗍 𝗆𝖾 𝖻𝖺𝖼𝗄 𝗂𝗇 𝗂𝗍... 𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗀, 𝖨 𝗐𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗍 𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗂𝗇. 𝗂𝖿 𝖨 𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝗁𝗈𝗅𝖽 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗎𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗂𝗇
custom 59786744998626671304
Signed 𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗌 (rogue ver)
هی میام یه چیزی بگم میگم ولش کن ارزشش رو نداره. میرم همون سریالم رو ریواچ میکنم. مردم میتونن به بیشعور بودن خودشون ادامه بدن.
custom 53504471466907164273
Signed 𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗌 (rogue ver)
طوری که لوگان مثل برادر بزرگتر هوای رمی و روگ و کرت رو داره قلبم رو به شکل عجیبی ذوب میکنه. امیدوارم خدا دو ذره عقل به اگزویر بده =)
custom 53504471466907164272
Signed 𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗌 (rogue ver)
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Heliotropea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 168,852 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“୭ 𝑉𝑒́𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜(🥀)” (@Heliotropea), 81 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Heliotropea.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.