Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for حکایت ناب منبر

Channel

حکایت ناب منبر

@Hekayat_Nab_Menbar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

407subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001133367674
TypeChannel
Username@Hekayat_Nab_Menbar
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Hekayat_Nab_Menbar

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4074114096 August 2026 — 410 subscribers6 August 2026 — 410 subscribers13 August 2026 — 409 subscribers26 August 2026 — 411 subscribers2 September 2026 — 410 subscribers17 September 2026 — 407 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 42 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 406–412 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 22:16407-3
2 Sept 2026, 12:13410-1
26 Aug 2026, 07:54411+2
13 Aug 2026, 16:06409-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:33410no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:37410first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍16100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jun 2026, 23:25 UTC118 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#ما_منتظر_صبح_ظهوریم #با_مهدی_علیه_السلام #حکایت_ناب_منبر #عید_سعید_فطر #رمضان1447 #نوروز1405 ♦️ حکایت شماره‌ی ۱۵۳ 🎴 #قصیده_ای_که_صاحب_جواهرالکلام_آرزو_میکرد_در_نامه_عمل_او_باشد 👈🏼👈🏼 #شیخ_عباس_قمی بعد از نقل زیارت ائمه بقیع چنین می‌نویسد: بدان که کثرت شوق این مهجور شکسته به آن مشاهد مشرفه مرا وادار می‌کند که از #قصیده_هائیه فاضل اوحدی، مادح آل احمدی جناب شیخ ازری رحمه‌الله چند شعری که مناسب با این مقام است ذکر کنم

👍7

1 Jun 2026, 23:23 UTC94 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#ما_منتظر_صبح_ظهوریم #با_مهدی_علیه_السلام #ماه_مبارک_رمضان #نکته_های_مهدوی #حکایت_ناب_منبر #رمضان1447 #منتظر_ظهور ♦️ حکایت شماره‌ی ۱۵۲ 🎴 #فراق_امام_زمان_عجل‌_الله‌_فرجه_در_روزهای_پایانی_ماه_مبارک_رمضان 👈🏼👈🏼 مرحوم #سید_بن_طاووس رضوان‌الله‌علیه در بخش #وداع_ماه_مبارک_رمضان از کتاب #إقبال_الأعمال، چنین می‌نویسد: وَمِن وَظائِفِ الشيعَةِ الإمامِيّةِ بَل مِن وَظائِفِ الأمَّةِ المُحَمَّدِيّةِ أن يَستَوحِشوا في هذِه الأوق

👍6

1 Jun 2026, 23:21 UTC65 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#نکته_های_نقد_مولوی #ماه_مبارک_رمضان #حکایت_ناب_منبر #مطاعن_دشمنان #رمضان1447 #مطاعن_عمر #نقد_مولوی ♦️ حکایت شماره‌ی ۱۵۱ 🎴 #آیا_تا_بحال_کسی_مانند_مولوی_از_عمر_بن_خطاب_چنین_تعریف_نموده؟! 👈🏼 الحق که او دلدادهٔ عمَر بوده! وی می‌خواهد روایتی نبوی را از عمر نقل کند وضمن آن از او چنین یاد می‌کند: «امیرالمؤمنین عمر خطاب رضی الله عنه، آن محتسب شهر شریعت، آن عادل مسند اصل طریقت، آن مردی که چون درهٔ عدل در دست امضای اقتضای

👍3

1 Jun 2026, 23:19 UTC47 viewsread 6 August 2026

#با_امیرالمؤمنین_علیه_السلام #با_علی_علیه_السلام #ماه_مبارک_رمضان #نکته_های_تبرایی #حکایت_ناب_منبر #فضائل_و_مناقب #دفع_دشمنان #رمضان1447 #مطاعن_عمر ♦️ حکایت شماره‌ی ۱۵۰ 🎴 #آیا_میدانید_یهودیان_اولین_بار_لقب_فاروق_را_برای_عمر_انتخاب_کردند؟! 👈🏼👈🏼 عَنْ صَالِحِ بْنِ كَيْسَانَ قَالَ: قَالَ ابْنُ‌شِهَابٍ: بَلَغَنَا أَنَّ أَهْلَ الْكِتَابِ، كَانُوا أَوَّلَ مَنْ قَالَ لِعُمَرَ الْفَارُوقَ، وَكَانَ الْمُسْلِمُونَ يُؤْثِرُون

1 Jun 2026, 23:18 UTC48 viewsread 6 August 2026

#بمناسبت_هجوم_دشمن_یهودی 👇🏼👇🏼

1 Jun 2026, 23:17 UTC49 viewsread 6 August 2026

#با_رسول_خدا صلی‌الله‌علیه‌وآله #با_اهلبیت_علیهم_السلام #نکته_های_تفسیری #ماه_مبارک_رمضان #حکایت_ناب_منبر #تفسیر_قرآن #رمضان1447 ♦️ حکایت شماره‌ی ۱۴۹ 🎴 #اعمال_ما_در_مراعی_و_منظر_رسول‌_الله_و_ائمه_اطهار_علیهم‌_السلام 👈🏼👈🏼 (وَقُلِ اعْمَلُوا فَسَيَرَى اللهُ‌ عَمَلَكُمْ وَرَسُولُهُ وَالْمُؤْمِنُونَ وَسَتُرَدُّونَ إِلى عالِمِ الْغَيْبِ وَالشَّهادَةِ فَيُنَبِّئُكُمْ بِما كُنْتُمْ تَعْمَلُونَ) بگو: «عمل كنيد! خداوند و فر

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Hekayat_Nab_Menbar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“حکایت ناب منبر” (@Hekayat_Nab_Menbar), 407 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hekayat_Nab_Menbar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.