Channel
@Health_AI_inside
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
57subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003937214126 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Health_AI_inside |
| Description | Исследую ИИ, полезные для жизни и работы и делюсь с вами! Путь перекладывания на ИИ рутины, освобождая время для важного… |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 6 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Health_AI_inside |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 57 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 57 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 70.6% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 17.6% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 11.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ИИ-астролог, который пишет толковые вещи! Про предназначение, таланты, отношения, деньги и т.д Анализировала для своего проекта рынок различных ИИ-«гадалок» и наткнулась на очень толковый бот! Сделал Павел Андреев, а у него очень многогранный взгляд на мир, как я люблю. Зацените и вы (без оплаты) : https://t.me/chronos_io_bot?start=3a4ba8a3565543f48e7ab358773d86f2 И поделитесь, насколько в вас попало описание :)
File, posted without a caption
Написала музыку! Была задача - сделать промо-ролик для своего проекта. Ну я решила, что хочу еще и свою ИИ- музыку для промо-ролика! И внезапно получился трек, который у меня уже час на репите! 😎 Послушайте и вы! 🎶
Коротко о главном ❤️🔥 Я в итоге пошла на обучение профессиональное по нейросетям, потому что поняла, что дешевле научится у тех, кто уже умеет, чем тратить свое время на раскопки с нуля по нескольким направлениям. Сейчас делаю в рамках обучения проект Интегративного портрета души - синтез нескольких систем познания себя, с добавлением мощностей ИИ для красивых рекомендаций и брейншторминга. Для проекта хотела отр…
👍1
Нарушить авторское право, генерируя картинки Создать сайт с желаемым вайбом Создать бета-версию ИИ-ассистента, пишущего рекомендации по моей базе знаний… - коротко о моей жизни с ИИ за последнюю неделю 🤪 Про что рассказать подробнее?
Евиный Мейнстрим! или как легко протестировать качество информации внутри ИИ, а так же качество подготовки презентаций Выбираем узкую (идеально не мейнстримную тему), в которой вы глубоко сами разбираетесь и просите ИИ сделать по ней презентацию на 10 слайдов. Изучаете и делаете выводы: бро данный ИИ для вас в этой теме или не бро 😎 Поскольку я очень люблю историю медицины, долго ее изучала, чтобы понять как оно …
🎤 «Я просто хотел тебе понрааааавиться…» — именно так себя ведёт ИИ, когда выдаёт«галлюцинацию» 😅 Помните эту строчку? Она идеально описывает,почему ИИ иногда: - ссылается на несуществующие исследования; - «анализирует» данные, которых нет; - уверяет вас в чём‑то с такой харизмой, что невольно хочется поверить Да, речь про ИИ‑галлюцинации — и сегодня разберемся, почему они возникают и как с ними дружить. Почему ИИ…
❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
🧪 Нашла ИИ - сервис по расшифровке анализов! Сервис называется LetsNova. Загрузила для теста свой последний ОАК (удалив персональную информацию, это супер-важно!), через 2 минуты на почту пришел короткий отчет + предложение полного отчета за 99р 🙃 Как можно увидеть, в кратком отчете описано в основном попадание или непопадание в референс, что доступно и без ИИ любому человеку с глазами 😅. Но один момент мне показа…
❤1
🤖 4 кита грамотного промпта: как получить от ИИ именно то, что нужно Как успехи с промптом про магний? Понравился результат? Лично мне он напомнил пост только что закончившего обучение нутрициолога, которому очень важно показать, какой он умный 😅Чисто я в 2021 году. 😅 Проблема в том, что такой пост подавляющее большинство людей даже до середины не дочитают, а мы же так не хотим, верно? Если результат не такой, как …
❤1👍1
С праздником Великой Победы над фашизмом!
❤3👍1
🤖 Топ‑3+ бесплатных и доступных в РФ ИИ‑сервиса для старта — бери и пробуй прямо сейчас! Если ты новичок в ИИ, и не знаешь, с чего начать - этот пост для тебя. + практика в конце! 🔥 1. ChatGPT (в РФ через Telegram‑бота можно) 🌍 Страна: США (OpenAI) ✅ Плюсы: • мастер генерации текстов: посты, статьи,чек‑листы • умеет вести диалог: уточняй, исправляй, добивайся идеального ответа; • легкодоступен — просто найди Teleg…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Health_AI_inside. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что сейчас наиболее интересно в теме ИИ для вашей работы?
The shares total 188%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 11 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,195,717 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИИ Внутри | ИИ для ЗОЖ-экспертов” (@Health_AI_inside), 57 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Health_AI_inside.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.