Channel
@HazsLab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
114subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002802347692 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HazsLab |
| Description | No paid promos. Every post rides on genuine conviction. Welcome to the lab 🧬 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HazsLab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 114 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:10 | 114 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 9 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
10 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 60.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 30.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2025 to 5 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Think we all stopped raging atp lads, Now just delusionally laughing. These been some my long term plays. Let it all nuke as low as possible, research what you can about each and spread risk. Blue chips
Signed Haz
If you've been talking a break from trenching cause the market was ass., Ease back into it. Tonight's market reminds me of early last year. Thank f things are picking up again and it was just a phase 🤞
Signed Haz
Happy new year lads 😁 We all gonna 1 up ourselves this year than last. No matter f what. Love.
❤1
Signed Haz
Moonbag moonin, send it to 10mil
Signed Haz
JUST IN: Solana falls below $125 @TruthMarketNews
❤2
Signed Haz
JUST IN: $TSLA stock just hit NEW ALL TIME HIGHS
Signed Haz
Gambled of this here @60k mcp, never thought it would this low. But seeing as it's an uptrend might be worth a shot. This High risk play, don't buy if your working w/ limited funds please, I'll post safer plays once I come across any
Signed Haz
This is being shilled by a known rugger. Be careful. Especially around the times when the market is ass. They come out to suck the last bit of remaining blood
Signed Haz
Watching $1649AC for now. Thesis: The co founder of Ledger publicly asked the com to create a protest shitcoin against the new French amendment 1649AC. He wants everyone buys 1or2 tokens, and each token is designed to show a 1B “value” every Dec 31, making the law’s reporting requirements useless. Symbolic play with a strong narrative behind it but I think we can still get a cleaner entry than the current ~1.5M CA:…
Signed Haz
11x from this call 💎✋🏼 or 5.5x from my og call. Either way we up fat
❤3
Signed Haz
Channel photo updated
Channel name was changed to «Haz's Lab 🧬»
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @HazsLab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Haz's Lab 🧬” (@HazsLab), 114 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HazsLab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.