Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 45 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 365–373 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 07:00
370
-2
10 Sept 2026, 11:41
372
+4
1 Sept 2026, 04:26
368
+2
12 Aug 2026, 01:33
366
no change
11 Aug 2026, 09:48
366
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 12 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 04s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
459 reactions across 18 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
141
30.7%
👏
54
11.8%
🔥
53
11.5%
👍
51
11.1%
❤🔥
41
8.93%
custom 6310014072649685068
29
6.32%
🥰
15
3.27%
🤬
14
3.05%
custom 5368618332981306724
12
2.61%
🤩
10
2.18%
👎
7
1.53%
😍
6
1.31%
custom 5332392311064108513
5
1.09%
⚡
4
0.871%
👻
4
0.871%
👨💻
3
0.654%
🗿
2
0.436%
🤝
2
0.436%
👌
1
0.218%
💯
1
0.218%
4 further kinds
4
0.871%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 459 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 16 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سکه های طلایی چنگیز خانی
سکههای طلاییِ کشفشده از شهر غزنی، مربوط به دورهٔ امپراتوری مغول، از نظر تاریخی و سکهشناسی حائز اهمیتاند در یکی از این سکهها (سمت راست) توصیفاتی با عبارت «الخاقان العادل الاعظم چنگیز خان» دیده میشود که بازتابدهندهٔ عنوان و مشروعیت سیاسی حاکم مغول است در مقابل، سکهٔ سمت چپ به دورهٔ خلافت عباسی تعلق دارد و نشاندهندهٔ رواج و نفوذ نظام پولی عباسیان در منطقه پیش از استقرار کامل قدرت مغولان…
🔺️ميدانستيد ۳ دایره در پرچم امیر تیمور بنیانگذار و امپراتور تیموریان چه معنی دارد؟
🔺نشان مخصوص امپراتور تیمور، سه دایرهای است تا یک مثلث را تشکیل دهند، این سه دایره بیانگر این است که او تیمور، حاکم بر سه ربع جهان است. این وسیلهای است که تیمور دستور داده بود روی سکههایی که او برای او ضرب شده است و روی تمام بناهایی که او ساخته است، نصب شود.
🔺️ این سه دایره علاوه بر این، نقش مهر امیر تیمور هستند که به دستور ویژه او…
🔺️پرترهای که سفیر هپتالیان را میان سالهای ۵۱۶-۵۲۶ میلادی (چیزی حدود هزار و پنجصد سال پیش از امروز) در دربار دودمان لیانگ در پایتخت آنها در شهر جینگژو/جیانگژوی چین نشان میدهد.
🔺️این تصویر میتواند شکل و شمایل هپتالیان و فرهنگ لباسپوشی آنها را به نحوی به نمایش بگذارد، عزیزان به شکل و شمایل فزیکی و نحوه پوشش این پرتره دقت کنید!
༺ 𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧☛︎: @Hazaras_History ༻
🔺️سلام خدمت همه همراهان گرامی کانال ایرخانات هزاره، تشکر ازینکه همراه ما هستید، به زودی فعالیت های خود را دوباره آغاز میکنیم و اندک، اندک اطلاعاتی برایتان به نشر میسپاریم!
🔺️لازم به ذکر است جوابی برای بعضی مغرضان هم در نظر گرفتهایم، مغرضان کسانی هستند که اسم پدر شان را به درستی بلد نیستند و در مورد تاریخ ما چرند نویسی میکنند. امیدوارم بخوانند و آگاه شوند، اگر به صلاح بود در مورد خودشان هم واقعبینانه طور بعضی پس…
🔺️ویدیو ادیتی زیبا از دوست مان علی زاده!
🔺️بخاطر کمتر فعال بودن هم پوزش میطلبیم، چند وقتی هست مصروفیت ها بیشتر شده با این حال فعالیت ادامه خواهد داشت لینک کانال را منتشر کنید و دوستان تان را دعوت کنید، سپاس از همراهیتان!
༺ 𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧☛︎: @Hazaras_History ༻
🔺️إِنَّ اللّهَ لاَ يُغَيِّرُ مَا بِقَوْمٍ حَتَّى يُغَيِّرُواْ مَا بِأَنْفُسِهِمْ!---خداوند سرنوشت هیچ قومی را تغییر نمیدهد مگر آنکه آنان آنچه را در خودشان است تغییر دهند.
🔺️این آیه از قرآن کریم (سوره رعد، آیه ۱۱) بیان میکند که تغییر وضعیت یک قوم به دست خودشان است و تا زمانی که خودشان تلاش نکنند و تغییر در درون خود ایجاد نکنند، خداوند نیز سرنوشت آنها را تغییر نخواهد داد.
🔺️بدون شک که آیات الهی حق هستند، ۳۶ سال قب…
🔺️امروز مصادف است با سیوششمین سالگرد تاسیس حزب وحدت اسلامی، حرکت تاریخی که برای احیای حقوق هزارهها و شیعیان تاسیس شد!
⚜️در سالروز تأسیس حزب وحدت اسلامی افغانستان، یاد و خاطرهی همهی آن انسانهای آزادهای را گرامی میداریم که با ایمان به عدالت، کرامت انسانی و آزادی، گرد هم آمدند تا صدای محرومان، مظلومان و بهحاشیهراندهشدگان این سرزمین باشند.
⚜️حزب وحدت اسلامی افغانستان، فراتر از یک تشکل سیاسی، نماد یک آرمان ج…
❤10❤🔥7👏2🤬1custom 63100140726496850681
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Hazaras_history. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 16 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Hazaras_history named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@iranics_core named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hazara Erkhanate | هزاره ایرخانات” (@Hazaras_history), 370 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hazaras_history.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.