Airdrop Haven pinned «🎉 Exciting Rewards Await! Refer & Earn 🎉 🔥 Invite your friends and earn 1,000 NEKO for each successful referral! 🚀 Your NEKO referral link: https://t.me/NekoBaseBot?start=653003666 💰 More invites = More NEKO! Make at least 3 referral to eligible for withdraw…»

Channel
Airdrop Haven
@HavenAirdrops
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
211subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002229726834 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HavenAirdrops |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 22 August 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HavenAirdrops |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 211 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 213 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 214 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 215 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 215 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 22 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
192 reactions across 12 posts, in 65 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 5.21% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 10 | 5.21% | |
| 🖕 | 9 | 4.69% | |
| 🍓 | 8 | 4.17% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 3.65% | |
| 👾 | 7 | 3.65% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 3.65% | |
| 😴 | 7 | 3.65% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 2.60% | |
| 👻 | 5 | 2.60% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 2.60% | |
| 😐 | 5 | 2.60% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 2.60% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 2.60% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 2.60% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 2.08% | |
| 💋 | 4 | 2.08% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 2.08% | |
| 😡 | 4 | 2.08% | |
| 🤨 | 4 | 2.08% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 1.56% | |
| 45 further kinds | 79 | 41.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2024 to 7 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🎉 Exciting Rewards Await! Refer & Earn 🎉 🔥 Invite your friends and earn 1,000 NEKO for each successful referral! 🚀 Your NEKO referral link: https://t.me/NekoBaseBot?start=653003666 💰 More invites = More NEKO! Make at least 3 referral to eligible for withdraw !
👎5😍3🍓2🎅1🏆1👍1💔1🤷♂1
Airdrop Haven pinned a photo
Good Morning, LayerEdge! How: >> Open https://dashboard.layeredge.io >> Use referral code to proceed. >> Referral code: cod2Da1B >> Connect wallet >> Once you're in the dashboard, click "start node" to begin mining.
🤯3🤨2😭2❤1👏1🤪1😎1😐1
Airdrop Haven pinned «[𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨] 𝐌𝐄𝐌𝐇𝐀𝐒𝐇 𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆 ✨ 🔗 Start Mining Now: t.me/memhash_bot/start?startapp=i9RDN 𝐀𝐁𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐌𝐄𝐌𝐇𝐀𝐒𝐇: First-ever PoW (Proof of Work) Mining on Telegram, fully supported by Pavel Durov, Telegram CEO. Every mined block carries real token rewards shared among…»
[𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨] 𝐌𝐄𝐌𝐇𝐀𝐒𝐇 𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆 ✨ 🔗 Start Mining Now: t.me/memhash_bot/start?startapp=i9RDN 𝐀𝐁𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐌𝐄𝐌𝐇𝐀𝐒𝐇: First-ever PoW (Proof of Work) Mining on Telegram, fully supported by Pavel Durov, Telegram CEO. Every mined block carries real token rewards shared among participants. Tokens, not points, are mined through Memhash. ⚠️ 𝘖𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘪𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶'𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘬 300 𝘚𝘛𝘈𝘙𝘚 (₱300) 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘴
😴3🌚2🐳2👌2❤🔥1🎃1👾1💔1
Airdrop Haven pinned « …»
𝗨𝗣𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗠𝗘𝗠𝗛𝗔𝗦𝗛 𝗕𝗟𝗔𝗖𝗞 𝗙𝗥𝗜𝗗𝗔𝗬 𝗦𝗔𝗟𝗘 🛒 t.me/memhash_bot/start?startapp=i9RDN • 𝗟𝗜𝗠𝗜𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗘𝗦𝗦: 200 stars (from 300 stars) • 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝗘𝗡𝗘𝗥𝗚𝗬: …
🖕4👻3👍2🍓1💘1💩1🕊1🤣1
Airdrop Haven pinned «BOOM 272.3 reward. HOW TO GET STARTED: • Get early access (get 4,500 energy): t.me/memhash_bot/start?startapp=i9RDN • Pay 300 STARS (or via gcash) • Start Mining • Complete extra social tasks • Replenish energy every day or pay 200 stars if you cant wait…»
BOOM 272.3 reward. HOW TO GET STARTED: • Get early access (get 4,500 energy): t.me/memhash_bot/start?startapp=i9RDN • Pay 300 STARS (or via gcash) • Start Mining • Complete extra social tasks • Replenish energy every day or pay 200 stars if you cant wait Memhash is the very first PoW (Proof of Work) mining in Telegram which is fully supported by Pavel Durov - TG CEO. Every block carries token rewards and will b…
👎4😍2🙉2💊1🤓1🤔1🤗1🤝1
[ALPHA RETRO] MEMHASH AIRDROP ✨ Memhash introduces the first-ever Proof of Work (PoW) mining system on Telegram, fully supported by Pavel Durov, Telegram’s CEO. Instead of earning points, participants mine actual tokens distributed through blocks. How It Works: 1. Join the Airdrop: Start mining tokens by paying 300 STARS (₱300). (STARS can be purchased from trusted sellers like Pong Paz at ₱1 per STAR.) 2. Star…
🤔3👍2😴2☃1🎅1🏆1🐳1💩1
Introducing $Circle, partnership with Majors. The Sparks circle is launching at Sept 23🎇 https://t.me/sparkscirclebot/Circle?startapp=ref_601310 Getting started is easy: ✨ Earn Sparks: 1️⃣ Invite friends; 2️⃣ Complete tasks; 3️⃣ Visit the game daily. 🍀 Upgrade them into $Circles: 1️⃣ Go to the Upgrade tab; 2️⃣ Choose a chance from 1% to 100%; 3️⃣ Enter the amount of Sparks to upgrade and start 🎁 Earn rewards: 📱 …
💋2🖕2❤🔥1🍌1🤝1🤩1🤪1🤷1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @HavenAirdrops. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@HavenAirdrops named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@salonemajazi · 28,894
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Airdrop Haven” (@HavenAirdrops), 211 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HavenAirdrops.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.