Channel
@Haniyeh_maghsoodi05
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
259subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001246455945 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Haniyeh_maghsoodi05 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Haniyeh_maghsoodi05 |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 259 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 261 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 259 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 262 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 264 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 264 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
36 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 47.2% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 19.4% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 11.1% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.56% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 5.56% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 2.78% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.78% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 2.78% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
توضیحات تکمیلی اینجاست😁👇 یه دلیل دیگهای اینکه حروف واضح ادا نمیشن ممکنه ضعف اندامهای گفتاری باشه. یا خوردن انتهای حروف و نفس گرفتنهای متعدد حین جملات ممکنه ناشی از تنفس ضعیف باشه. اما در خیلی از مواقع مشکل اصلی اینه که بعضیاتون تند و هیجانی حرف میزنید😄 وقتی تند حرف میزنید ناخواسته انتهای جملات خورده میشه، بخش عظیمی از حروف مالیده میشه، نیاز بیشتری به شارژ نفس دارید، مخاطب برای فهم صحبتاتون نیاز به دقت و تلاش…
❤2
برای پیجِ Amir_photogrraphy گوینده: هانیه مقصودی
❤1
ولی واقعا حق با منه؛ نیست؟🫠
🤣2👍1
بازخوانی تیزر اراند گویندهی اصلی: آرش جوان
نمازت بوی خون دارد؛ اذانت بوی ویرانی...
👏2💔1
خب... بعد از سالها؛ وقتش بود با آویژه خداحافظی کنم:)❤️
🔥4
کدومشو بیشتر دوست دارین؟
The shares total 167%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
همینی که گفتم دختر قشنگم:)❤️🤝
❤1
یه جور نمیمونه🫴
❤5
آم... دوباره بارگذاریش کردم چون ایندفعه با میکروفن ضبطش کردم و البته با تمرین بیشتر:) ممنون میشم نظر بدید🤝
بازخوانی تیزر اسنوا😄 گویندهی اصلی: آرش جوان پ.ن: سر این تمرین امروز داشتم به دوستم غر میزدمو عربده میکشیدم: رو حروووف طراحی کردهههه رو حرووووف. کلمههم نههه رووو حروووف. خلاصه پند اخلاقی امروز اینکه از رو نمونه کارهای استادتون کاور نکنید ولی حالا اگه کردید اشکال نداره؛ بشینید دعا کنید مردم اجرای اصلی یادشون نباشه بتونن بپذیرنتون و بعد برید بشینید غصه بخورید. خلص و تمت🫴😂
🔥2
میدونم انتظار دارین فاخر باشم ولی رطب خورده منع رطب نمیکنه؛ بنده غلام حلقه به گوش افکار بدم😂🤝
😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Haniyeh_maghsoodi05. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کدومشو بیشتر دوست دارین؟
The shares total 167%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هانیه مقصودی|Haniyeh maghsoodi” (@Haniyeh_maghsoodi05), 259 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Haniyeh_maghsoodi05.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.