Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 66 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,930–2,007 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Oct 2026, 08:41
1,977
-10
5 Oct 2026, 13:36
1,987
-1
27 Sept 2026, 11:37
1,988
-8
18 Sept 2026, 00:40
1,996
-2
9 Sept 2026, 20:19
1,998
+12
4 Sept 2026, 03:21
1,986
-9
31 Aug 2026, 19:36
1,995
+9
29 Aug 2026, 03:13
1,986
+18
25 Aug 2026, 20:23
1,968
-2
23 Aug 2026, 05:57
1,970
-3
20 Aug 2026, 02:08
1,973
+20
17 Aug 2026, 12:27
1,953
-2
14 Aug 2026, 05:48
1,955
+8
10 Aug 2026, 14:13
1,947
+6
7 Aug 2026, 17:20
1,941
+2
7 Aug 2026, 15:02
1,939
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:01
1,939
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
744 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
605
81.3%
🔥
63
8.47%
👍
33
4.44%
🤣
17
2.28%
👏
8
1.08%
😁
7
0.941%
😭
5
0.672%
🤡
2
0.269%
🥰
2
0.269%
👎
1
0.134%
🙏
1
0.134%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 744 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Arsenal had offered Vini Jnr one of the biggest packages in the history of the PL.
Conversations around being the face of PL, sky rocketing his brand economically and globally and a true chance at winning the Ballon d'Or. He was presented with testing himself in the best league in the world and leading Arsenal for another UCL push.
I have been critical of some of our movements in this market but this? The ownership…
Christian Nørgaard has now officially left Arsenal Football Club and joined Everton after successfully passing a medical.
Bruno G set to formalise his move to Arsenal Football Club in the coming days.
Real Madrid improve their offer to Vini Jnr. The player is very appreciative of the gesture and willingness.
I am told it still does not exceed the package Arsenal have presented.
Final decision still yet to be made but player feels it was a positive meeting.
Arsenal set to finalise a move for Bruno G today. Well placed sources say the total package reaches £80m.
The Brazilian is expected to fly today to complete medical and formalities tomorrow.
Have we made contact yet? Who knows.
21 November: FT: Newcastle 0 Arsenal 1. Bruno Guimaraes 90+4 winner
Newcastle sources insist nothing is done yet between Guimaraes and Arsenal.
Newcastle Senior officials feel it was an intermediary who is playing games.
One can seriously question if there was even a bid placed yesterday? Maybe it is the friends we made along the way.
It was Newcastle doing the “oooo look at how we dont want to sell our captain”
PR and Optics of this circus.
See you at the finish line Arsenal fans.
Norgaard to Everton as reported by ElBobble & David_Ornstein 👌🏽
Class act and always showed support and leadership even when he was not selected.
The speed at which we wrapped up Tzolis after selling Leo Trossard is important.
Bruno G… End Game. Speak soon.
🚨 EXCL : Arsenal Football Club have personal terms agreed in principle with Vinicius Junior. Roc Nation will go armed into negotiations with Real Madrid with a monstrous offer from the English Champions…….over to you Vinicius Junior. Story W/ @MrArsenicTM
According to well placed sources, Arsenal will present a package that will total in the region of £80m for Bruno G.
Personal terms agreed.
Eddie Howe was told weeks ago, the club were considering the sale of the talisman.
❤45🔥7👏6👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HandofArsenal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@HandofArsenal named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@mrarsenictm named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HandöfArsenal.” (@HandofArsenal), 1,977 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HandofArsenal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.