3 measurements spanning 15 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65–66 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 01:36
65
-1
10 Aug 2026, 02:01
66
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:16
66
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
37 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🥰
12
32.4%
👍
10
27.0%
😁
8
21.6%
❤
4
10.8%
👏
2
5.41%
🔥
1
2.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2024 to 24 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hello 👋 everyone, New update added called Blue pay and it is a paying update if you are using android phone you can download the app clip on hamster airdrop 👇, to continue, ones you download the you will receive 200,000 naira free from us, so see you, if you don’t understand anything kindly ask some questions feel free to ask question
Hello Hamster 🐹, we are giving out free 1 Billion $HMSTR to your wallet, connect your hamster wallet by posting you link
To get that you must invite about 6 people and complete task, if you really want to participate join know, It will end by OCTOBER 11 Friday, I will post who ever withdraw there hamster
🐹Who put the withdrawal to the Telegram wallet - check. $HMSTR should be in place.
Have you received HMSTR?
❤️ - YES
🗿 - NO
Forward to your friends
CLICK ON PLAY 👇
🔥 LAUNCHPOOL ALERT 🔥
⚡️ The Binance community has already locked FDUSD and BNB worth over 14 billion USDT for 3 billion $HMSTR tokens.
⏳ If there's BNB and FDUSD in your portfolio, you can still participate in the $HMSTR Launchpool!
❕ Only 1 day left ❕
Hamster News 🐹 pinned «😎 STYLISH, COOL, CONVENIENT 😎 🧡 ByBit announced a Hamster Kombat-themed virtual card, specifically designed for the CEOs who want to be unique at all times!»
😎 STYLISH, COOL, CONVENIENT 😎
🧡 ByBit announced a Hamster Kombat-themed virtual card, specifically designed for the CEOs who want to be unique at all times!
Hamster News 🐹 pinned «🛡 PROTECTING THE HAMSTER 🛡 👿 We’ve banned over 2.3 million cheaters — enough to fill the entire city of Rome! 🏴☠️ Wondering how we caught them? Well, here’s an example: One person connected over 400 accounts to a single Binance address, while another invited…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Hamster_News_5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2024 to 24 October 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Hamster_News_5 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@hamster_05_bot named in 5 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@s3xbady named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hamster News 🐹” (@Hamster_News_5), 65 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hamster_News_5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.