Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Hamas Online English Mirror

@HamasEnglishMirror

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

368subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003461063269
TypeChannel
Username@HamasEnglishMirror
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/HamasEnglishMirror

Growth

3686 Aug 2026, 08:21 — 368 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:48 — 368 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 08:216 Aug 2026, 20:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 367–369 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 20:48368no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:21368first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.0%
avg views ÷ 368 subscribers
Avg views / post
66.4
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (24 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,262
Reactions total34
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
295
Videos
68
Links
1,790

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1852.9%
👍514.7%
🔥411.8%
👎25.88%
🙏25.88%
🤔25.88%
🫡12.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⭕ Press Statement The joint statement issued by the foreign ministers of Qatar, Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, Indonesia, Pakistan, Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt, condemning the continued Zionist violations in the Gaza Strip and warning against undermining efforts to implement the [ceasefire agreement's] second phase and disrupting the political track, underscores the grave danger of what the occupation gover

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC27 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ArchivesandMirrors

JOURNALISTS AND MEDIA ORGANISATIONS STAND IN SOLIDARITY WITH ASIER AND YOUSSEF: AN OUTRAGEOUS ATTACK ON FREE SPEECH AND PALESTINIAN SOLIDARITY We, the undersigned journalists, editors, and media organisations, issue this collective statement to register our absolute condemnation of the politically motivated arrests of internationalist activists Asier and Youssef. On 16 June, Spanish police launched a coordinated ope

2

3 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC65 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⭕ An official source in the Hamas Movement: The Hamas Movement and the Palestinian factions are sticking to what was agreed upon regarding the implementation of the second phase of the ceasefire agreement, including the commitments of all parties, and are awaiting a clear and official response from Mr. Nikolay Mladenov and the brotherly mediators regarding what was agreed upon. Islamic Resistance Movement - Hamas

👍2

2 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC77 viewsread 6 August 2026

⭕ Press Statement The frenzied, criminal Zionist bombardment across the Gaza Strip, since early morning, which resulted in the killing of more than 18 civilians, including the wiping-out of entire families from the civil registry, is a deliberate escalation by the war criminal Netanyahu's government aimed at obstructing the understandings reached with the mediators, including the US administration, to complete the

31 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC79 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⭕ Agreeing to include the issue of heavy weapons within the framework of the agreement was linked to cessation of all forms of aggression, withdrawal from Gaza, achievement of early recovery, entry of Gaza committee (NCAG), deployment of international protection forces, disbanding of armed militias formed by the occuption, & reconstruction, as well as guaranteeing right to self-determination, establishing the indepen

4🤔2

31 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC66 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⭕ Agreeing to include the issue of heavy weapons within the framework of the agreement was linked to cessation of all forms of aggression, withdrawal from Gaza, achievement of early recovery, entry of Gaza committee (NCAG), deployment of international protection forces, disbanding of armed militias formed by the occuption, & reconstruction, as well as guaranteeing right to self-determination, establishing the indepen

2

31 Jul 2026, 15:26 UTC62 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⭕ The occupation's commitment to halting the killing and ending its attacks is the fundamental prerequisite for proceeding with the implementation [...] whilst emphasizing that the implementation of the 2nd phase of the agreement is contingent upon the occupation's commitment to implementing all the provisions of the 1st phase. 31 July 2026 Official website - Hamas Movement https://t.me/kUoQCMfm8bI1NWE0

3

31 Jul 2026, 13:27 UTC58 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⭕ Hamas & the Palestinian factions have approached the negotiation process & the mediators' proposals for the full implementation of the second phase of the ceasefire agreement in a responsible & positive manner, and through national consensus among the Palestinian factions, demonstrating a spirit of partnership & responsibility... 31 July 2026 Official website - Hamas Movement https://t.me/kUoQCMfm8bI1NWE0

👎21

31 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC63 viewsread 6 August 2026

⭕ Press Statement The Hamas Movement, along with the Palestinian factions, has approached the negotiation process and the mediators' proposals for the full implementation of the second phase of the ceasefire agreement in a responsible and positive manner, and through national consensus among the Palestinian factions, demonstrating a spirit of partnership and responsibility, driven by our commitment to protecting ou

30 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC75 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⭕ Turkish translation of the press release on Hamas leader's meeting with Turkish Foreign Minister Haber Metni İslami Direniş Hareketi (Hamas) liderliğinden bir heyet, Hareketin Siyasi Büro Başkanı Dr. Halil el-Hayye başkanlığında, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Dışişleri Bakanı Dr. Hakan Fidan ile görüştü. Heyette, Filistin davasına ilişkin siyasi ve sahadaki gelişmeler, özellikle Kahire'de devam eden müzakerelerin seyri el

👍1

30 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC69 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⭕ Hamas Leader Meets Turkish Foreign Minister, Discusses Palestinian Developments A Hamas delegation, led by its Political Bureau chief Dr. Khalil al-Hayya, met with Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan to discuss the latest developments regarding the Palestinian cause, including the ongoing ceasefire negotiations in Cairo. The meeting addressed the occupation's continued military escalation, daily violations of t

1

30 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC65 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⭕ Press Statement The criminal Zionist bombardment on residential neighbourhoods, homes and tents of displaced people across the Gaza Strip over the past hours, which left a number of people killed, including children and infants, and has led to dozens of injuries, displacement and the terrorization of families, is a continuation of the fascist occupation's genocidal war against innocent civilians, and a flagrant v

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @HamasEnglishMirror. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 227,795 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hamas Online English Mirror” (@HamasEnglishMirror), 368 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HamasEnglishMirror.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.