Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مركز إصلاح وتأهيل الحدادية والغلاة

Channel

مركز إصلاح وتأهيل الحدادية والغلاة

@Haddadynews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,871subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001967476187
TypeChannel
Username@Haddadynews
Created26 May 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Haddadynews

Growth

1,8611,8711,8667 August 2026 — 1,863 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,863 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,862 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,861 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,871 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,860–1,873 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:171,871+10
10 Aug 2026, 22:471,861-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:411,862-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:321,863no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:501,863first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.2%
avg views ÷ 1,871 subscribers
Avg views / post
453
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held18 (18 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total8,145
Reactions total142
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 29s
Average length
1m 45s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

142 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9264.8%
😁1913.4%
🫡1510.6%
💯128.45%
😱32.11%
🤮10.704%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC232 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/vAWaZbSUmn0?si=9r1JtEmgC81ZApb_

🫡4

3 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC263 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

معلى بن منصور الرازي رحمه الله (ت211) هو من كبار أئمة الحديث والفقه فالقرن 2 هجري كان على مذهب أهل الحديث، وله ميل لمذهب أبي حنيفة. قال عنه الذهبي: "الإمام الحافظ الثقة" وهو من شيوخ البخاري ومسلم : روى عنه الإمام البخاري ومسلم في "الصحيحين". وهذه أعلى مرتبة للراوي. سمع من الإمام مالك بن أنس، وحماد بن زيد، وشريك القاضي، وأبي الأحوص وغيرهم. تلاميذه: البخاري، مسلم، أبو داود، الترمذي، ابن ماجه... يعني روى عنه أصحاب

6

3 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC241 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

أبو سليمان موسى بن سليمان بن داود الجوزجاني رحمه الله تلميذ الإمام أبي حنيفة والحسن الشيباني . من كبار فقهاء الحنفية في القرن 3 هـ. توفي سنة 200هـ أو 201هـ. وهو فقيه ومحدث وقاضي جوزجان هو الذي نشر مذهب أبي حنيفة في خراسان وما وراء النهر أشهر تلاميذه الإمام أبو جعفر الطحاوي . أقوال العلماء فيه الإمام الحاكم النيسابوري: "إمام أهل الرأي بخراسان في زمانه" الإمام الخطيب البغدادي: "ثقة ثبت، فقيه، روى عن محم

8

3 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC233 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

تاريخ بغداد / إسناده صحيح

9

2 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC272 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/Hd4cg3tsu08?si=AfcgRSaRUlYCvayH

🫡11

31 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC457 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

[ذكريات] بعد فوز الشيخ ابن عثيمين بجائزة الملك فيصل العالمية لخدمة الإسلام، بسنتين تقريبا، زرته في مسجده بعنيزة وسألته عن مؤلفات السيوطي، فقال لي: (السيوطي من أئمة الإسلام، وهو غزير العلم، وقد استفدت منه في النحو وغيره،لكن عنده أخطاء لا يتابع عليها، فينبه عليها بدون تجريح لذاته). د.أحمد بن مسفر العتيبي

17

28 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC509 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fahadalajlan

روى ابن الجنيد عبارة مؤثرة عن الإمام الشهير يحيى بن معين، يقول فيها: (إنا لنطعن على أقوامٍ، لعلَّهم قد حطُّوا رحالهم في الجنَّة منذ أكثر من مائتي سنة). وهي عبارة موجعة لقلوب المتقين من علماء السلف، ولهذا قال ابن مهرويه راوي هذه العبارة: (فدخلتُ على عبد الرحمن بن أبي حاتم وهو يقرأ على الناس كتاب الجرح والتعديل، فحدثتُه بهذه الحكاية فبكى، وارتعدت يداه، حتى سقط الكتاب من يده، وجعل يبكي، ويستعيدني الحكاية، ولم يقرأ في

💯63

27 Jul 2026, 20:54 UTC460 viewsread 7 August 2026

شاهد قبل الحذف هذا هو الاسم الذي كان السليمان يتهم الناس لأجله انهم طعنوا في عرضه

27 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC516 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

الشيخ الغلط...! النسخة التي عنده فيها الكلمة غلط وهو أصلا قرأ الكلمة غلط في النسخة (وما قدّروا ) ثم في الأخير المعنى كله غلط . الخليفي كل نتاجه سرد للكتب بدون تعليقات ولو كانت تكون يسيرة جدا جدا أو منعدمة في حلقات كثيرة ومع ذلك يغلط ويقرأ بدون فهم وتركيز ....

😁11

25 Jul 2026, 19:38 UTC541 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/fWrYHHiuCz0?si=qQ0jwrMl33acvoEE

8

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Haddadynews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTCAnonymous Poll72 voters

هل عبد الرحمن ذاكر

  1. بليد ؟40%
  2. متغافل ؟76%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

خالد النجار - Khaled Alnajjar
@khaledvoar · 103,079
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مركز إصلاح وتأهيل الحدادية والغلاة” (@Haddadynews), 1,871 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Haddadynews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.