Channel
@Hacktaika
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
29subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003114436408 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Hacktaika |
| Description | Высоколётное IT-агентство Мы молодые, но уже прокладываем свои маршруты в цифровом небе 👍🏼 «Мы создаём прочные гнёзда, а не рисуем облака» 🤝🏻Для совместных перелётов — @dislov_freelance 📍Для заказа @hacktaika_manager [email protected] hacktaika.ru |
| Created | 2 October 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Hacktaika |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 29 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 29 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 2 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
52 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 44 | 84.6% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 5.77% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2025 to 25 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Hacktaika. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 October 2025 to 25 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Почему бизнесу не стоит игнорировать XChat — даже если кажется, что это очередной хайп XChat пока сложно назвать полноценной бизнес-платформой, особенно на фоне Telegram, который уже давно встроен в процессы компаний. Но интерес к нему связан не с тем, что он уже стал полезным, а с тем, каким может стать в будущем. Многие крупные digital-платформы начинались как обычные инструменты для общения, а позже превращались …
❤4🤯1
ХакТайка — это IT-Студия, которая разрабатывает Telegram Mini Apps и цифровые продукты под ключ: от идеи до готового решения для бизнеса. Основной фокус — мини-приложения внутри Telegram, но при необходимости команда делает и более широкую разработку, включая мобильные решения. Ключевая особенность — прозрачный процесс: клиент всегда видит этапы работы, текущий статус и результат каждого шага. Разработка делится на …
❤4
Тестовое задание или развод? Разбираем на примере ХакТайки🥹 Если вы искали работу в IT, то наверняка сталкивались с ситуацией: сделали тестовое задание, отправили — и тишина, без ответа, без фидбека и без понимания, что произошло дальше, и именно поэтому у многих сформировалось ощущение, что тестовые задания — это чаще про бесплатную работу, чем про реальную оценку навыков, и мы в ХакТайке это прекрасно понимаем, по…
❤5
IT-НА ПТИЧЬЕМ | ХакТайка pinned a photo
После долгого затишья — А мы ничего не публиковали и не делали с декабря 2025 года🤯 Готовы рассказать вам много новостей. В нашем агентстве многое уже изменилось. 🌱 Начнём с того, что команда кардинально обновилась. Это стоило нам много сил. Мы сменили направление на TMA и частную разработку. Многое прописали и продумали, и сейчас готовы продолжать работу и прокачивать наш личный бренд. Наш ceo Владислав инвестиро…
❤4👎1
Video message, posted without a caption
😧Сервер умер красиво и навсегда. Восстановили через 9 часов. За это время конкуренты забрали 70 % трафика и половину аудитории навсегда. Без этого каждый клик из Владивостока, Калининграда и Алма-Аты летит на ваш единственный сервер в Москве. 😤 10 тысяч одновременных пользователей — и привет, TTFB 12 секунд, потом 504, потом тишина…🐦⬛
🤔3
😎 Это не теория — это практика, которая каждый день спасает сотни предпринимателей от ненужных расходов. MVP — это не про экономию ради экономии. Это про то, чтобы не тратить силы впустую и быстрее прийти к работающему бизнесу. Успех начинается не с идеального продукта, а с честного ответа на вопрос — а нужен ли он кому-то вообще?
❤4
Знаете, что такое MVP?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Есть хороший пример "понятного тз": Предприниматель говорит «хочу машину», а разработчик приносит велосипед. Формально транспорт? Да. Но решает ли задачу бизнеса? Совсем нет Хорошее ТЗ — это страховка ваших денег. По данным исследований, до 70% перерасхода в IT связано именно с тем, что стороны не договорились о требованиях.
❤5
Video message, posted without a caption
❤2
Каждый предприниматель знает это чувство: «Ну зачем мне сейчас тратить миллионы на автоматизацию? Мы и так справляемся». Они пришли с запросом: «Хотим систему, но чтобы она реально окупилась»
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Hacktaika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Знаете, что такое MVP?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2025 to 25 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 96,477 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IT-НА ПТИЧЬЕМ | ХакТайка” (@Hacktaika), 29 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hacktaika.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.