Channel
@HackersCardgame
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
58subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001319298024 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HackersCardgame |
| Description | ⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ WIRST CASE WIRD DIESER KANAL VON DEN WIRTSCHAFTSKRIMINELLEN Agenten und WIRTSCHAFTSKRIMINELLEN Amtspersonen als FALLE missbaucht ... https://hackerscardgame.org/2 ⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HackersCardgame |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 58 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 58 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 151 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Dann mindestens der einigen Eltern von uns 1980er Kinder darf man[n] / Frau nicht alles durchgehen lassen. Unsere Eltern sind so zwischen 1940 und 1960, und für so einen Post werde ich dann sowies von DIESER SORTE von Eltern noch mehr angefeindet, ABER wir haben genug Kriege auf der Welt, also ist mein Plan möglichst Kriege bereits im Kleinen zu verhindern, oder mindestens die DOOOOOOFHEIT von Kriegen im Grossen ode…
DISCLAMER: ich bin nicht akut suizidal, also mindestens nicht mehr als die letzten 25 Jahre im Median ... ... die Fotos haben sich einfach so ergeben, dort hat es hinter einem Container ein gutes Versteck mit richtig gutem Überblück für Füchse auf 2 Beinen wie mich. und ja ja ja, ich hab nur so eine Billig-Kompakt-Kamera und die zwar immer dabei aber kein Stativ, also hab ich schon aber nicht immer dabei.
Ich war zwar heute auch betroffen, aber nicht geschwächt worden. Mir geht es um die Kleineren. Bei diesen Dingen geht es darum das Kritische Denken der White-Hat's, Vergewaltigungsopfer in den Gruppen, Autisten wie ich welche gute analytische Fähigkeiten haben ... zu deaktivieren. Mit 1-2h Stunden solchen Angriffen wird die Handlungsfähigkeit der Opfer eingeschränkt, und oft sind sie dann auch besser fremdbestimmb…
gif noch bisschen geändert
Sticker, posted without a caption
aber bei mir hat es grad nicht funktioniert. Rationalisieren [1] hilft mir [1] also vom Wort Ration nicht vom Wort Ration, apropos Ration, jetzt muss ich mal etwas Futter kochen-essen
Sticker, posted without a caption
zur obigen FRage
ABER ein solcher Angriff würde statistisch so aufgebaut werden dass ein Beweis nicht zustande kommt. alsi p-hacking [1] VOR dem "Experiment", also "plausible deniability" Und der Offizier Nico W*** hat mir mal erklärt, dass sie in der Offiiers-Schule gelernt haben, dass man einen Zivilsten mit dem Sniper anschiessen soll, das würde mehr Personal unter den Zivilisten binden als wenn man einen Zivilisten ganz ermorde…
Das Problem mit Deiner Argumentation ist, dass zur Zeit n > 3 Menschen aus meinen und anderen Selsthilfe-Chat-Gruppen das selbe berichten. Also empirisch ist das schon mal sehr merkwürdig, und n > 3 reicht nocht nicht für eine Studie, aber da stimmt etwas nicht. Also das wären die "fisshing crusades" von denne Jacob Appelbaum bereist 2013 in den Snowden Leaks an seinem grossartigen Talk "To protect and infect, part…
Also bei mir in der Wohung ist das so etwas wie ein Loop-Recorder für das 3D Modell meiner Wohnung. Das ist kumulativ und für jeden Raum wird dann irgend eine zusätzliche Horrorstorry gerendert, dann ist auch plötzlich der Teddy-Bär von Claudine gemein zu mir und oft ist die S**uelle Integrität ein Ziel (also zB Toilette / WC) das erklärt auch die Wanze im Badezimmer von Julian Assange Also so etwas wie VIRTUELLE B…
case distinction: A) shitty looking car BUT very functional (eg with carpenter or metal tools für fixing things) B) shitty looking car with no additional features C) shiny looking car with a perfect child friendly penguin design there are SOME cases where you could trust a setup like A (picture taken 3 Minutes ago) but B possibly not and if it's to shiny like C i often ask myself: They have that much money for …
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @HackersCardgame. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HackersCardgame.ch” (@HackersCardgame), 58 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HackersCardgame.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.