Channel
@HZgs6688
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003969597594 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HZgs6688 |
| Description | 杭州小中大圈🉑上门，全杭各种类型覆盖！进频道查看 @HZcha6688 或者和客服说你的区域和需求，让客服推荐！ 客服 @hzsr520 双向机器人 @suran520bot |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HZgs6688 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 39 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 39 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (7 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 598 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🎉 👑顶级莞式 👑 🎉 🥓莞服每天中午各区最新推荐，🉑点击链接直接查看，不要迟到，迟到算自己时间！预订好了时间的，有变化需提前告知取消订单或者更改时间，谢谢！营业时间：下午1点到晚上1点 🥓滨江金沙顶级莞式2300 https://c.wss.ink/f/kl8xqtvwe1x 🥓滨江赵云顶级管事两次2300pp https://c.wss.ink/f/kl8tpwfzhgl 复制链接到浏览器打开 🥓上城暴富莞式1400一次2300两次 https://c.wss.ink/f/kl3ayft4ysl 🥓杭州俱乐部管事两次 https://c.wss.pet/f/kl3bw7npspf 🥓小白兔莞服2300p https://c.wss.cc/f/kkq3d7hzhot 🥓客服： @hzst521 🥓双向： @hzst521bot
#琪琪好评 2300pp 【验证留名】：可留可匿 【验证日期】：2026年8月8号 【妹妹花名】：琪琪 【妹妹类型】：轻熟女 【妹子技能】：口活一流 【人照几成】：懂得都懂 【目测年纪】：25上下 【身高身材】：160上下 【胸围大小】：c 【优点缺点】：优点：情绪价值满分 脸上笑盈盈的 不冷场 缺点：太骚 容易射得快 【过程报告】：伟大 无需多言 【简评总结】：1500p 2300pp还要啥自行车 【最终评分】：69 这是对她blow job和69的评分 把6换成9是对她整个过程的评价 为什么少了一分 是因为特么这台风天老子还在出击 我也是真的佛了 🥓水费2300pp 🥓安排 @hzsr520
#杭州 #滨江区极品莞服 #微信飞机 #69 #DL #kb #晴小雪 🥓安排 @hzsr520 🥓私信限制联系 @suran520bot 🥓水费顶级莞服两次 #2300pp 💋
#杭州 #滨江区极品莞服 #微信飞机 #69 #DL #林沐沐 🥓安排 @hzsr520 🥓私信限制联系 @suran520bot 🥓水费顶级莞服两次 #2300pp 💋
#杭州 #滨江区极品莞服 #微信飞机 #69舌吻 #DL #KB #喷 #小米儿 🥓安排 @hzsr520 🥓私信限制联系 @suran520bot 🥓水费顶级莞服两次 #2300pp 💋 喷潮＋300
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @HZgs6688. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 763,500 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“精选莞式” (@HZgs6688), 39 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HZgs6688.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.