Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

wht ` ПЕРЕЕЗД

@HWTFUCK

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

88subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001541976860
TypeChannel
Username@HWTFUCK
Descriptionадекватность это who #миягиканон
Created23 February 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/HWTFUCK

Growth

887 August 2026 — 88 subscribers9 August 2026 — 88 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 87–89 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 15:3388no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:5188first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Videos
1
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54181052167487627341132.4%
custom 5417899303131693769823.5%
custom 5420221737977524819720.6%
custom 5420163373666940632514.7%
custom 534604346947745412338.82%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2024 to 25 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Feb 2024, 07:57 UTC529 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 53460434694774541233

27 Feb 2024, 05:12 UTC504 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

хочу поменять имя на Катавица

custom 54181052167487627343

26 Feb 2024, 12:49 UTC514 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

действую по плану 2х2 2 минуты работы, 2 часа отдыха

custom 54178993031316937697custom 54181052167487627343

26 Feb 2024, 09:57 UTC509 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @QuotLyBotSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

25 Feb 2024, 03:50 UTC323 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pndropinion

мура из первого чата псай вообще любимая зая, за нее двор стреляю в упор

24 Feb 2024, 17:20 UTC320 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

бывалая мечта которая навсегда останется в прошлом так странно ощущается

custom 54201633736669406321custom 54202217379775248191

24 Feb 2024, 16:33 UTC320 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

остались люди которые слушают Тони Раута?...

custom 54181052167487627342

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @HWTFUCK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“wht ` ПЕРЕЕЗД” (@HWTFUCK), 88 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HWTFUCK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.