Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⚰️𝗛𝖀𝘀𝘁𝗹𝖊𝗿^᪲᪲ 〢𝑩𝑶𝑳𝑺𝑯𝑬 𝑵𝑬 𝑳𝑰𝑭𝑬

@HTR_life

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

41subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002056061438
TypeChannel
Username@HTR_life
Descriptionˋ¡!【 𝗦𝗧𝘼𝗥𝗧 ⇌ 𝟐𝟐.𝟎𝟕.𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒 】 ➥ 𝑰𝐍𝐹𝑶 - @HTR_info !¡ 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗠𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗔𝗗𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗦 :: ➥ @histlerbot
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/HTR_life

Growth

419 Aug 2026, 23:01 — 41 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 18:32 — 41 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 23:0110 Aug 2026, 18:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 18:3241no change
9 Aug 2026, 23:0141first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 29 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
456
Videos
17
Links
105

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘1428.0%
custom 5343657318791804216918.0%
custom 5307928581073025214714.0%
custom 5314547263115119159612.0%
custom 5314796212304501429510.0%
custom 537308826865502210636.00%
custom 528976135474225561924.00%
24.00%
custom 528299912200822143512.00%
🔥12.00%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2025 to 11 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Oct 2025, 09:44 UTC162 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗟𝗘 | 🤩 | #новости Вместе с собой в гроб, я забираю лайф канал. 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🎀🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️ Лайф закрывается по причине не знаю какой, официальную причину мне рыжий не сказал. Союзы со всеми разрываются

custom 53079285810730252143custom 53147962123045014293

Signed ‣︎︎︎︎ ㄴ𝙑𝘼𝙇𝙏𝙐𝙍...ㄱ__ #𝐻𝑇𝑅 #СодержанкаАвана

11 Oct 2025, 08:53 UTC156 viewsread 10 August 2026

𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗟𝗘 | 🤩 | #𝘀𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗦 Постов больше не будет, Искра ливнула при исполнении🫤

Signed ‣︎︎︎︎ ㄴ𝙑𝘼𝙇𝙏𝙐𝙍...ㄱ__ #𝐻𝑇𝑅 #СодержанкаАвана

11 Oct 2025, 08:37 UTC157 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗟𝗘 | 🤩 | #анон Ты что попуск 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🎀🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️ Они воспользовались моей добротой душевной и целых 2 года мучали. Так что я жертва аборта абьюза🥺

custom 53147962123045014292custom 53436573187918042162💘1

Signed ‣︎︎︎︎ ㄴ𝙑𝘼𝙇𝙏𝙐𝙍...ㄱ__ #𝐻𝑇𝑅 #СодержанкаАвана

11 Oct 2025, 08:33 UTC134 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗟𝗘 | 🤩 | #анон в смысле увольняют, а что мне читать😭 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🎀🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️ Будете с этими нормисами сидеть. Они меня поюзали и кинули. Буду теперь обиженкой в хихистлере этом🙄

custom 53436573187918042162custom 53079285810730252141

Signed ‣︎︎︎︎ ㄴ𝙑𝘼𝙇𝙏𝙐𝙍...ㄱ__ #𝐻𝑇𝑅 #СодержанкаАвана

11 Oct 2025, 08:27 UTC113 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗟𝗘 | 🤩 | #𝘀𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗦 Меня скоро увольняют, а эта Влада уже строит свои коварные планы😠

2

Signed ‣︎︎︎︎ ㄴ𝙑𝘼𝙇𝙏𝙐𝙍...ㄱ__ #𝐻𝑇𝑅 #СодержанкаАвана

9 Oct 2025, 23:06 UTC101 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗟𝗘 | 🤩 | #𝘀𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗦 Что-то это мне напоминает... Warning: Флуд на скрине закрыт больше года назад 𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗔𝗚𝗟𝗜𝗔 |🤩| #𝘀𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗧 все новое — это хорошо забытое старое

💘1🔥1

Signed ‣︎︎︎︎ ㄴ𝙑𝘼𝙇𝙏𝙐𝙍...ㄱ__ #𝐻𝑇𝑅 #БХНЛИМПИБАНПКПНСДФКА

9 Oct 2025, 22:56 UTC58 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗟𝗘 | 🤩 | #𝘀𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗦 Спустя год мы наконец-то обрели истинное название 𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗔𝗚𝗟𝗜𝗔 |🤩| #𝘀𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗧 вступайте, мы вам сплетни расскажем все

💘1custom 53730882686550221061

Signed ‣︎︎︎︎ ㄴ𝙑𝘼𝙇𝙏𝙐𝙍...ㄱ__ #𝐻𝑇𝑅

3 Oct 2025, 04:17 UTC95 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗟𝗘 | 🤩 | #𝘀𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗦 А Сандроне лох 😂🫵🫵🫵

💘5custom 53436573187918042162custom 52829991220082214351custom 53079285810730252141

Signed ‣︎︎︎︎ ㄴ𝙑𝘼𝙇𝙏𝙐𝙍...ㄱ__ #𝐻𝑇𝑅

3 Oct 2025, 03:49 UTC96 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗟𝗘 | 🤩 | #𝘀𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗦 Вот вы думаете, куда мы пропали, а у нас тут битва не на жизнь, а на смерть 𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗔𝗚𝗟𝗜𝗔 |🤩| #𝘀𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗧 и мут не нужен

💘4

Signed ‣︎︎︎︎ ㄴ𝙑𝘼𝙇𝙏𝙐𝙍...ㄱ__ #𝐻𝑇𝑅

3 Sept 2025, 04:35 UTC132 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 53436573187918042162custom 53079285810730252141

1 Sept 2025, 10:33 UTC130 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗟𝗘 | 🤩 | #𝘀𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗦 Удачных голодных игр🥰

Signed ᚚᏙᏌᏞᎢᏌᏒᚚ𓅆 #𝐻𝑇𝑅

1 Sept 2025, 10:31 UTC119 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @SoulKissLifePhoto

❤️Новостная Газета «Чудесные Сказания» — В нашем проекте прошел очередной месяц, и за это время, редакция «Чудесных Сказаний» подготовила нашим читателям свежие новости! Мы приглашаем наших участников и союзников, окунуться в атмосферу удивительных новостей! Новость №1...🎁 За июль месяц, нас успело покинуть 8 участников! Причины всегда разные.. Такие как: - не набор нормы; - собственное желание. Но есть и хорош

Signed ᚚᏙᏌᏞᎢᏌᏒᚚ𓅆 #𝐻𝑇𝑅

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @HTR_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 717,201 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⚰️𝗛𝖀𝘀𝘁𝗹𝖊𝗿^᪲᪲ 〢𝑩𝑶𝑳𝑺𝑯𝑬 𝑵𝑬 𝑳𝑰𝑭𝑬” (@HTR_life), 41 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HTR_life.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.