SEO专员 👥 招聘人数:若干 📍 工作地点:泰国(TH) 🕒 工作时间:10–12 小时制 / 月休 2–4 天(具体时间视情况而定) 💰 薪资待遇:15K – 20K RMB(面议) ⚧️ 性别:不限 👤 年龄:35 岁以下 🎓 学历:计算机相关专业毕业或具备相关经验 🌏 国籍:中国籍 🗣 语言要求:中文 🔎 岗位需求 不要小白 熟悉主流编程语言,对建站有深入理解,具备站群经验(操控上百站群经验优先) 熟悉百度和谷歌排名规则,掌握 SEO 手段,了解黑帽与白帽的差别 熟悉多种 SEO 推广方式,了解黑帽手法优先 能熟练应用快照劫持、寄生虫程序等方法获取定向流量 懂技术或具备一定技术能力,能结合 SEO 使用 具备 SEO 团队管理及搭建经验,学习能力与抗压能力强,能高效完成领导交代任务 🛠 岗位职责 负责公司网站在主流搜索引擎的自然排名优化,提高流量 分析并总结竞争对手 SEO 方法,合理运用提升效果 结合流量统计工具…
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @HRyuanzai/3232 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC | @HRODgz/125 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @HRyuanzai/3253 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC | @HRODgz/127 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @HRyuanzai/3304 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC | @HRODgz/132 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @HRyuanzai | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @HRyuanzai (10–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
- Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
- 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
- shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
- Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @HRyuanzai. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
