Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ненавижу вслух

@HBdsgn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

320subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002491358234
TypeChannel
Username@HBdsgn
DescriptionПо всем вопросам в лс – @S5Rash Анон – @HBanonBot
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/HBdsgn

Growth

3208 Aug 2026, 06:53 — 320 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:31 — 320 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:538 Aug 2026, 07:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 319–321 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:31320no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:53320first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 320 subscribers
Avg views / post
67.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (24 January 202631 July 2026)
Views total67
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
60
Videos
6
Links
41

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
31s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

278 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋5921.2%
🍓5018.0%
😈4014.4%
🕊3813.7%
👻269.35%
💘248.63%
🙈248.63%
🙊165.76%
🙉10.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 278reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
124
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 20 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
55
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @HBdsgn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 January 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 21:59 UTC67 viewsread 8 August 2026

Что для вас дизайн? Просто хобби или способ заработка?

20 Jun 2026, 23:49 UTC201 viewsread 8 August 2026

Это к слову проще чем мне казалось, ну а может меня за углом ждёт подлянка а я еще просто не дошла 😈😈

20 Jun 2026, 23:46 UTC202 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Давненько от меня не было вестей, я не ушла и все ещё работаю но в своем темпе. Скоро начинается новый этап жизни – универ, пока конечно только бумажная волокита нооо честно говоря я в шоке от того как быстро летит время. Ещё кстати я перешла работать в фш, не могу сказать точно насколько мне это нравится и все ли получается, но рука постепенно набивается Надеюсь в скором времени я доползу до "полной тест драйв функ

💋3💘1🕊1😈1🙈1

8 Jun 2026, 14:23 UTC259 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Вместо дизайна занимаюсь перспективными вещами

💋4😈2🙈2

1 Jun 2026, 14:43 UTC293 viewsread 8 August 2026

У меня за цель на лето освоить фш хотябы как-то и вы бы знали как я срусь либо облажаться и делать там хуже чем на телефоне, либо вообще не получить прогресса в скиле

11 May 2026, 21:00 UTC474 views13 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Обычно к таким постам пишут масштабные итоги года или что-то в этом роде, но единственное, что я могу сказать — несмотря на то, что год был тяжелым, в нем все равно было много хорошего Я благодарна всем с кем прошла этот этап жизни. Всем, кого повстречала, и всем, с кем пришлось попрощаться. Без вас и вашей поддержки все это не имело бы смысла Посмотрим, что будет дальше, но сейчас.. С днём рождения меня! 🎊

💋6🕊3🍓2👻1💘1

9 May 2026, 15:35 UTC359 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

До 12 числа включно не работаю, не майтесь хуйнёй и ознакамливайтесь с правилами перед заказом 😐

💘1

5 May 2026, 18:45 UTC448 views30 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Чонгуки атакуют Если честно без текста мне нравится больше но для практики сойдёт 🤔

🙈11🙊7🍓6💋2💘2👻1😈1

18 Apr 2026, 20:09 UTC526 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Выздоровела так что ждите в скором времени работки (нет) А пока видео 🦭

🙈2💋1🕊1😈1

6 Apr 2026, 09:13 UTC815 views31 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Она такой милой получилась🎧

💋11🍓6🕊6😈3👻2💘1🙈1🙊1

3 Apr 2026, 15:05 UTC684 views15 reactions55 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вместе с @zodiac_dg Наконец-то Аня сделала своего персонажа 🦭

😈7💘4🍓2👻1🙈1

25 Mar 2026, 14:04 UTC590 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Апдейт, потому что многие как вижу не поняли Я не делаю полное оформление Я делаю одну работу в рамках практики 💁🏻‍♀ Если пишете в бот – обязательно прикрепляйте юз. И пожалуйста, составляйте тз грамотно, а то это пиздец

😈5👻3🙊3💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HBdsgn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 91,909 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ненавижу вслух” (@HBdsgn), 320 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HBdsgn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.