Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 北京【管鲍会】导航中转广播发布

Channel

北京【管鲍会】导航中转广播发布

@Gzbhggb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

891subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002448497076
TypeChannel
Username@Gzbhggb
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Gzbhggb

Growth

888891889.58 August 2026 — 889 subscribers9 August 2026 — 888 subscribers17 August 2026 — 891 subscribers8 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 888–891 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 11:18891+3
9 Aug 2026, 09:51888-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:48889first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 27 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jun 2026, 09:56 UTC200 viewsread 8 August 2026

@ii0567456 亚运村鸡头带的黑车坑女孩坑用户,有时候换人或插队罚站学生 避雷

14 Apr 2026, 04:01 UTC695 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

简单放个瓜吧,双井某开2000的 因为诈骗了某狼友20多万,被逼又去整容了 这是第三次整容,对外说基本没动 整容部位:隆鼻、增高眉骨、打嘟嘟唇、腹部和大腿吸脂、开眼角 胸是做的,下面是硬块,不过花钱多点比硅胶强 说实话,以前还算好看的,现在地包天了有点儿,越整越比,对外号称02还是03,实际00.01,已经入行5.6年了,大学就开始接客 好本事,话说有没有人让我捞20万?

1

29 Mar 2026, 06:12 UTC644 viewsread 8 August 2026

亚运村蓝心/玖月 同一代聊,黑车,避雷,坑了不少人

28 Feb 2026, 02:57 UTC686 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📢 群规与清退机制 V1.4 最终执行版 ⭐ 本群定位与优势 请先阅读 本群为筛选制 CJ 群 所有内容以真实上课·实际体验·客观反馈为核心 群的核心价值在于 ✅ 已完成前置筛选 降低90%踩雷与筛选成本 ✅ 新人老师与更新内容持续引入 体验节奏快 ✅ 价格统一透明 支持理性 基于事实的讨论 ✅ 真实评价体系 不过度吹捧 也不回避问题 本群更适合 已明确需求 希望高效决策的用户 重视体验与信息真实性的人 若更偏向长期观望 泛聊或单纯收集信息 本群可能并不适配 一、基本原则 本群仅服务真实有需求、有上课意向的用户 鼓励理性交流 真实反馈 反对任何破坏秩序 消耗群体验的行为 群内一切行为以群安全 群体验 群生态为最高原则 群及频道仅用于资源对接与有效沟通 不适用于泛社交 情绪表达或无实际需求的围观行为 二、价格与讨论规则 允许的讨论方式 群内统一公开的价格体系 基于事实 实际体验或清晰对比 有助于新人理解行情

8 Feb 2026, 05:37 UTC572 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚠️⚠️ 高危提醒|强烈建议直接避开 双井不什么的2000某位极不稳定、高纠纷率对象,特征高度一致,已在多个圈子反复验证为问题源头: • 每次以新人设+新人身份切入 • 照片与本人差异明显,外观与资料多次不一致,整容脸➕假胸 • 账号、人设、外形频繁更换,出现周期极短,随后消失再现 • 对外包装为“开课老师”,实际以快速变现为核心,捞术 • 在多个中介、多个渠道均有合作记录,但几乎无长期合作存活不超过一个月(23年初在某安开始,不到一个月,24年换皮两次,25年这是第四次了) • 合作过程中频繁出现私加、绕开中介和群、坐地起价、临时变条件 去年捞某个几十w被上门 • 多方反馈存在中途终止、不退、扯皮等情况 • 已造成实质性损失,涉及金额较大(细节不展开) • 历史轨迹复杂,存在明显连带风险 • 行为模式高度反复,属于结构性问题而非偶发 • 曾因外部纠纷被多方包括物业.j等关注,邻居举报,相关落脚点后续已无

1

28 Jan 2026, 09:55 UTC287 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @BjgzsxymdPhoto

声明|本来点到为止,直到有人越过红线 本来已经点到为止,不打算继续这个话题。 但在说明发布后,仍然出现去社交平台私信、跨平台挖墙脚翘女孩的行为(这本事谁有?) 一开始也考虑过是否存在巧合,但结合完整时间线、相关证据以及既有的利益关系,这样的情况是否只是巧合还是精心设计步步为营,各位自行判断吧。 为避免更多人被误导或被利用,只能把事实一次性放出来。 ⸻ 整件事完整经过(时间线版) 20号(前置背景,利益关系在先|) 20号下午,林森主动来办理会员。 同日晚上20点前后,黑车体系中另一个群发布同行某包养群广告,群内多人当场质疑:是否开始收费打广告,是否违背此前反复宣称的“永久中立、终生不盈利”。 相关质疑与回应均有截图,对方亦未正面否认“广告/收费”事实,并以“要不要发红包”等方式回应。 利益立场是否已发生变化,是否还具中立性和客观性,各位自行判断。 ⸻ 25号16点多(异常用户正式进入事件) 发现林森此前卷入过某小

27 Jan 2026, 11:24 UTC223 viewsread 8 August 2026

公告|关于 独家的预约与风控升级(必读) 兄弟们 从今天起,08.118的预约全部按新标准执行。 近期已被同行与异常危险用户盯上,出现挖墙脚、阴招试探、约不到就诋毁、带节奏等行为。 良家本身时间就少,任何非正常行为,一律不接、不解释、不周旋。 为保障正常玩家约的质量和女孩稳定性和少干扰 预约门槛如下: • 本群出击 3 次以上 • 或已是 LSVIP • vip用户不到三次的可充值 999 成为 LSVIP 陌生号、信用度低、异常行为号: • 一律不接 • 不用问原因 • 不再沟通 ⸻ 再次重申并强化风控规则(不再提醒): 1. 口嗨两次以上,直接踢群 2. 咨询或预订(包括老师投诉)时,反复改时间 / 改套餐 / 改项目超过两次,拒绝接待 3. 在群内无缘无故诋毁、中伤老师(不分独家或非独家),或阴阳带节奏的,永久拉黑 4. 没出击记录、却长期水群、跑多个群、指点江山的,直接清理 以上行为,默

27 Jan 2026, 05:15 UTC188 viewsread 8 August 2026

任何未经当事双方核实、仅凭单方面口述并断章取义发布的内容,都不具备公信力。 所谓“中立”,应建立在完整事实与前后因果之上,而非选择性呈现与刻意指向。 类似发布方式并非孤例,其是否涉及利益相关,留待各方自行判断。 完整经过与时间线已提前发布于频道公告(26号下午6点左右全部长文,27号凌晨一点公开主要图文证据截图),连夜(凌晨3点多)抢发投稿是为何呢?这么急 相关判断请以原始记录为准。 一段话总结: 半年前口嗨7.8次/和其他老师有纠纷被屏蔽榜单但是没踢群 ➡︎中间骚扰3.4次 ➡︎上一周20号换了名字马甲回来求加群 ➡︎扬言充值加会员/给他打码999加会员,自行扫码了7888加更高一档并且金额可抵扣包养介绍费,并非预约定金 ➡︎问东问西多次,每天问一遍,最后锁定一个非要无套内射/➕💰劝退/25号继续来问,改来改去,改了三四次,反复磨 ➡︎发现不太正常且有个视频里疑似他给某网红站台洗地吹捧,于是打算拒绝,他反复找某背书自证,反复

27 Jan 2026, 03:33 UTC187 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

摘选几张核心证据(完整证据时间截图:https://t.me/Ddgk110 ) 林森(以前叫像火一样,疑似参与过帮某网红洗白),现在已经查到和其他老师也有金钱相关纠纷 在多个群反复造谣,同时出现多个小号配合带节奏。(看热闹起哄的散了吧) 截图均为掐头去尾版本,重要完整聊天记录我这边全部留存。 是不是自导自演、是不是小号配合,大家自己看时间线判断。 完整经过与原始证据已一次性放在链接里。 不想参与这种无聊的事情,也不陪人演戏。 放出来只为避免有人被带节奏、被利用。 完整版经过和截图(他截图部分断章取义获得受害者叙事,然后马上删了聊天记录并把我拉黑了,反手去造谣 学的谁啊?殊不知不是只有你保存记录啊,你怎么不敢放完整的尤其你那几百条信息和语音轰炸,哥们是想干嘛啊? 是不是为了压某条热度? 不给其他地方素材制造热度,不参与任何利益纷争,只做好本小而美的群 看完就好,后续不再回应(会直接拉黑踢掉不看证据上来就诋毁造谣的,没功夫跟

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Gzbhggb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“北京【管鲍会】导航中转广播发布” (@Gzbhggb), 891 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gzbhggb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.