Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 1

Channel

1

@GribGift

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

-4,117 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002634008490
TypeChannel
Username@GribGift
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GribGift

Growth

14,1182,059.57 August 2026 — 4,118 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,118 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,117 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,101 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,079 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,052 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,021 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,994 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,926 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,905 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,886 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 29 days, net -4,117. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 10:591-3,885
1 Sept 2026, 08:363,886-19
29 Aug 2026, 02:493,905-21
26 Aug 2026, 09:333,926-68
23 Aug 2026, 02:483,994-27
20 Aug 2026, 00:224,021-31
16 Aug 2026, 18:374,052-27
13 Aug 2026, 06:064,079-22
10 Aug 2026, 12:314,101-16
7 Aug 2026, 18:064,117-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:174,118no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:064,118first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5247.7%
🔥2321.1%
🐳2220.2%
👍98.26%
🤔32.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2025 to 12 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 20 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GribGift. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 November 2025 to 12 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Feb 2026, 13:49 UTC596 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

РКН заблокировали Московские активисты заблокировали вход в офис Роскомнадзора повесив велосипедный замок на их дверь.

11👍2🔥1🤔1

2 Feb 2026, 09:12 UTC969 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 У нас запустился бот @GribStarsBot Теперь всё, что нужно, — в одном боте: ⭐️ Покупка и продажа звёзд по самым выгодным ценам 👑 Премиум на 3 / 6 / 12 месяцев 🎁 Обычные подарки и NFT-подарки 🤝 Аренда подарков, юзернеймов и анонимных номеров 💸 Реферальная система — приглашай друзей и зарабатывай с их покупок 🆘 Техподдержка 24/7 — всегда на связи и поможет в любой ситуации Быстро • удобно • без лишней суеты Залетай и

5👍1🔥1

25 Jan 2026, 12:08 UTC776 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вышли улучшения на медальку

🔥32👍1

18 Jan 2026, 23:00 UTC742 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Plush Pepe обновил исторический максимум цены! Цену уже запампили до 10 600 TON (18 338$)

👍32🔥1

2 Jan 2026, 09:09 UTC576 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎁 Кто-то только что, случайно продал пепу за 1300 ТОН (в 5 раз меньше флора) Комментарий продавца: с*ка. я хотел вывести, кнопки перепутал. вместо вывести нажал продать

2🔥2🐳1

30 Dec 2025, 05:13 UTC396 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

❗️ MRKT вынесли на $25 000 из за бага с не правильной оценкой подарков, баг позволял покупать дорогие подарки за копейки Сейчас маркет не работает. Разрабам походу не сладко будет сегодня... Интересно, а продавцам по 70 тон пришло или нет?

2👍2🔥1

27 Dec 2025, 07:02 UTC410 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Теперь прямо в чате можно сгенерировать картинку с помощью ИИ. Как создать: 1) Заходим в чат и пишем @pic 2) Нажимаем «нарисовать картинку с помощью Алисы AI» 3) Пишем задачу и нажимаем «нарисовать» Имба? Кидайте ваши генерации👇

3🐳1🔥1

23 Dec 2025, 01:56 UTC449 views4 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кто-то резко выкупил шаманов и поднял флор в 2 раза. Признавайтесь

2🐳1🔥1

20 Dec 2025, 11:53 UTC420 views4 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🆕 🆕Теперь на Тг маркете минимальная цена для выставления подарка - 7 TON (для офферов тоже) Гифты, выставленные до обновления, сохранили прежние цены 📌Новость неоднозначная! И вот почему: Шлак подарки брать за 7 тон не будут => актив маркета упадёт Если у них цель поднять продажи именно за старсы, то это сработает, НО общее количество операций всё равно снизится (тк трейд бан 21 день, если брать за старсы,то неудо

2🐳1🔥1

20 Dec 2025, 01:38 UTC296 views3 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

🧐Режим Gift Plinko просто огонь! Начал играть прямо с выхода и не заканчиваю, забрал шляпу 🎁 Balls - покажи свои яйца🤩

1🐳1🔥1

19 Dec 2025, 21:44 UTC279 views4 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Холдеры NFT подарков сейчас такие

2🐳1🔥1

19 Dec 2025, 21:39 UTC264 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

АХАХАХА Чего? 🎁 Вышла елочка за 50!⭐️ Без лимита по числу Price: 50 ⭐️ Limit: ∞

🐳51🔥1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GribGift. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“1” (@GribGift), 1 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GribGift.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.