POV: You opened Figma for 5 minutes and got a little carried away ✨🍰 #figma #uidesign #webdesign #figmadesign #designinspiration #creative #uiux #digitaldesign
❤32👍7🔥5👏4😁1

Channel
@Graphics_designerr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
58,381subscribers
-411 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001120575611 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Graphics_designerr |
| Description | A creative space for graphic design enthusiasts. Discover inspiration, tips, and ideas in Graphic Design, UI/UX, and Motion Graphics Admins:👨🏻💻 @neunaxel 👩🏼💻 @vetolsa |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Graphics_designerr |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 58,381 | -46 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 58,427 | -27 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 58,454 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 58,466 | -23 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 58,489 | -23 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 58,512 | -30 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 58,542 | -51 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 58,593 | -45 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 58,638 | -17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 58,655 | -28 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 58,683 | -22 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 58,705 | -24 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 58,729 | -29 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 58,758 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:20 | 58,769 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 58,781 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 58,792 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 15 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,523 reactions across 11 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,504 | 42.7% | |
| 🔥 | 816 | 23.2% | |
| 👍 | 693 | 19.7% | |
| 🤩 | 180 | 5.11% | |
| 👏 | 72 | 2.04% | |
| 👎 | 64 | 1.82% | |
| 🤔 | 54 | 1.53% | |
| 🥰 | 46 | 1.31% | |
| 🤬 | 22 | 0.624% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 0.596% | |
| 👌 | 16 | 0.454% | |
| 🍌 | 13 | 0.369% | |
| 🙊 | 8 | 0.227% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 0.142% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.085% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.085% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 0.057% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.028% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,523reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2023 to 18 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Graphics_designerr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 January 2023 to 18 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
POV: You opened Figma for 5 minutes and got a little carried away ✨🍰 #figma #uidesign #webdesign #figmadesign #designinspiration #creative #uiux #digitaldesign
❤32👍7🔥5👏4😁1
🤩Media & Page Transitions A bold layout with horizontal carousel instead of the typical vertical scroll. Media slides rotate side to side with smooth 3D transitions, creating a cinematic, fluid experience. Dark tones and sharp typography complete the modern, confident look. #webdesign #uidesign #interactiondesign #motiondesign #creativecoding
❤70🔥22👍8😱3👏1
⚫️AI + Web = Magic Came across a website concept for an AI agency — and got hooked. Volumetric graphics, smoke, particles — feels like diving into a neural network. Futuristic, sci-fi, and a bit of digital drama. Just a concept, but so on point. What do you think? #webdesign #aestheticui #aiconcept #uidesign #digitalvibes
❤75🔥18👏7👍6⚡5🥰1
Noticed logos in movies? They’re not just pretty letters. They carry mood, tone — sometimes even spoilers. The Substance — cold and sterile. Like it came straight out of a lab. Anora — delicate and romantic. Feels like a love story… but it’s just the bait. Dune — an abstract mark, like a rune carved in sand. Joker — a typeface cut with nerves. Nothing extra — just unease. Hit the like if you want part two🎬✨
❤156👍48🔥10🥰6👏5
Wow! Google has updated its logo for the first time in ten years. The new version is already available in the Google app on iOS. Instead of the separate colors that used to fill the letter “G,” the logo now features a gradient. What do you think? ☺️🔍
🔥155❤72👍66🤔32🤬22😁13🥰8🙊8
Top Font Trends for 2025 (With examples) 📌Save this post so you don’t lose it! 1. Elegant Serifs Chic, sharp, luxurious. → Quinn Display 2. High-contrast Grotesques Bold, modern, tech-friendly. → FK Screamer 3. Handwritten with Personality Human, warm, expressive. → Arsenica Hand 4. Nostalgia & Art Deco Retro, geometric, classy. → Blayuer Nur 5. Shape Experiments Unusual, bold, artistic. → Whyte Inktrap ✅ And c…
👍73❤62👏4🔥4❤🔥3🥰2😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥208❤160👍114👏35🤩29👌16🥰16👎15
Animated upload button - The code of this animation will be placed on this channel soon #UiUx
🔥142👍119❤105🤔22👎16🤩12👏8🥰2
🎁 Interactive Sliders in figma - full tutorial
❤498👍126🔥82🤩82👎10🥰7😁6👏2
😍 You need to try this Character Builder! This builder is amazing. It’s components based and you can create Characters within seconds🥰 🔗 Link 🆔 Channel
🔥132❤101👍79🤩32👎11🥰4👨💻2
💠 How to create a responsive design in Figma
❤173👍47🔥38🤩25👎12👏3
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Graphics_designerr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Graphic Designer” (@Graphics_designerr), 58,381 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Graphics_designerr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.