Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Гранат Максим

@GranatMaximChannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,341subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001314976876
TypeChannel
Username@GranatMaximChannel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GranatMaximChannel

Growth

3,3403,3413,340.57 August 2026 — 3,341 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,341 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,340 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,341 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,340–3,341 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:273,341+1
7 Aug 2026, 16:513,340-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:313,341no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:283,341first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.5%
avg views ÷ 3,341 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 April 20264 August 2026)
Views total5,274
Reactions total346
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 58s
Average length
4m 58s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,405 reactions across 20 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍45032.0%
🔥32823.3%
17512.5%
😁17412.4%
🤯735.20%
🤬332.35%
💯322.28%
🙈302.14%
😱281.99%
🤡231.64%
🤨140.996%
😢110.783%
🤣80.569%
👀70.498%
👏40.285%
💊30.214%
🖕30.214%
🍌20.142%
🙏20.142%
🤷‍♂20.142%
3 further kinds30.214%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,405reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC534 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Небольшое видео про текущую работу. Объяснения столичного "ведомого" продавца, данные им в полиции. Довольно примечательный документ. Если здесь не откроется, есть в ВК

🔥24👍11

Signed Maxim Granat

29 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,230 views113 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почему часто прошу доверителя лично не участвовать в заседании? Зарисовка из зала суда Спор по разделу имущества супругов. Делим недвижимость, счета, общий бизнес супругов. Защищаю жену. Муж, не подумав, при подаче встречного иска зачем-то потребовал ареста всех счетов общей компании. Ну, судье не жалко – арестовала. Деятельность общества оказалась парализована. Соответственно, нужно процесс как можно быстрее сворачи

😁81🔥217🤡3💊1

Signed Maxim Granat

19 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC≈1,530 views80 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Неожиданно...

😁39👍24🔥15🤡1🙏1

Signed Maxim Granat

15 Jul 2026, 20:12 UTC≈1,980 views118 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В продолжение моего последнего поста про ведомых. Вчера в Казани со Щипановым А.В. выиграли дело со стороны покупателя. Больше двух лет бились: дело 2-15/2026 в Вахитовском суде Казани. В деле три экспертизы, из них две не в нашу пользу, а одна - ни вашим ни нашим, но мы все же выиграли. Бабушке, кстати, сочувствую - она действительно потеряла 17 млн ₽, но перекладывать последствия на непричастных - так себе идея. Ее

🔥85👍32🤝1

Signed Maxim Granat

9 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC≈1,550 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Декларирование унаследованных наличных денег: правовые последствия Вы помните советский мультик про «Золотую антилопу» и жадного раджу, который не хотел возвращать визирю его золотые монеты? Раджа боялся, что случайно вместе с монетами визиря он отдаст и какие-то свои монеты. Отличная сказка! Никогда не думал, что столкнусь с ней в суде. О чем речь? В одном провинциальном городе жила и работала в муниципалитете женщ

🤯22🤡54😁2🔥1

Signed Maxim Granat

9 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC≈2,060 views77 reactionsread 7 August 2026

установленные нормативными правовыми актами Российской Федерации или нормативными актами Центрального банка Российской Федерации, а также за расходами их супруги (супруга) и несовершеннолетних детей в случаях ив порядке, которые установлены Федеральнымзаконом от 03.12.2012 № 230-ФЗ «О контроле за соответствием расходов лиц, замещающих государственные должности, и иных лиц их доходам», иными нормативными правовыми акт

🤯45🤬17👀7👍5😁3

Signed Maxim Granat

6 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,180 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если помните, была в том году публикация про "похищение" московской квартиры у собственницы. Причем квартиру злоумышленники не просто переоформили на другое лицо, но и перепродали - с ипотекой. Долго мы судились, наконец первую инстанцию выиграли: Хамовнический суд Москвы, дело 02-0035/2026, жилье вернулось собственнице. Почему-то именно в Хамовниках лично у меня было несколько таких судебных процессов, с небольшими

👍27🔥15👏4🤣2🤡1

Signed Maxim Granat

30 Jun 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,850 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Оценка рисков при покупке недвижимости, на примерах Пример 3. Из недавнего прошлого. Меня рекомендовали одному региональному чиновнику. Сказали, что я могу выиграть его процесс. Посмотрел документы - понял, что не смогу. Чиновник купил дом на Волге за 1.5млн долларов. Рассчитался наличными. Из документов об оплате у него есть только расписка. Теперь продавец – банкрот. Арбитражный управляющий оспаривает сделку, ссыл

🔥5611🍌1💊1🤡1

Signed Maxim Granat

23 Jun 2026, 11:44 UTC≈1,900 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Оценка рисков при покупке недвижимости, на примерах Пример 2. Часто вижу, как арбитражные управляющие, ведущие банкротное дело, не спешат возвращать в конкурсную массу имущество, проданное должником. Сделки между банкротом и номинальным владельцем не оспариваются долгое время. Недавно разбирали очередное такое обращение. Есть банкротное дело № А40-9544/17-88-18«Ф». Как вы видите из номера дела, процесс начат в 2017 г

👍1711😢5😱3🤷‍♂2

Signed Maxim Granat

16 Jun 2026, 18:00 UTC≈2,730 views112 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Оценка рисков при покупке недвижимости, на примерах Пример 1. Вчера были клиенты. Банальная история: планируют покупку коммерческой недвижимости за восьмизначную сумму в рублях. Текущий собственник - гражданка России, вполне законопослушная. Долгов нет. Судебных процессов с её участием - нет. Владеет имуществом с 2025 г. Продает по рыночной цене. Вроде бы, все хорошо. Правда, в договоре с прежним собственником цена у

48💯32👍23🙈8🤡1

Signed Maxim Granat

10 Jun 2026, 14:16 UTC≈2,820 views87 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почему психиатры и психологи не определяют состояние "ведомости" на освидетельствовании до сделки? Почему даже заключения специалистов ФГБУ им. Сербского не спасают от судебных процессов? Почему до сделки врачи могут сказать, что "ведомости нет", а после сделки - что "ведомость имелась?" В прежние времена подобные наработки я бы не озвучивал публично, но проблема затрагивает слишком много людей. Каждое решение суда,

👍5717🔥11🍌1🤡1

Signed Maxim Granat

6 Jun 2026, 08:20 UTC≈2,220 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Яндекс-почта, вчера... обычный рабочий день И нет, я не спамер В принципе - ожидаемо, после всех их подписок, платного я.диска и т.д.

🤨14😱10💊1🔥1🤡1

Signed Maxim Granat

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GranatMaximChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 477,604 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гранат Максим” (@GranatMaximChannel), 3,341 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GranatMaximChannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.