🐉🔥 گاتلایف - کانال قدیمی و تخصصی طرفداران و دنبالکنندگان بازی تاجوتخت و خاندان اژدها
〰️〰️〰️
آرشیو:
@GotLifeArchives
〰️〰️〰️
کانال میم:
@GoTLifeMemes
〰️〰️〰️
ارتباط با ما:
@MentionMahziyar
Created
Between 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
13 measurements spanning 11 days, net +74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,093–14,233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 18:18
14,183
-14
15 Aug 2026, 02:13
14,197
-4
13 Aug 2026, 16:37
14,201
-13
12 Aug 2026, 12:38
14,214
-3
11 Aug 2026, 13:34
14,217
+10
10 Aug 2026, 13:28
14,207
+26
9 Aug 2026, 16:03
14,181
+22
8 Aug 2026, 18:50
14,159
+3
7 Aug 2026, 22:02
14,156
+16
6 Aug 2026, 21:35
14,140
+24
6 Aug 2026, 02:22
14,116
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:45
14,116
+7
5 Aug 2026, 22:11
14,109
first reading
Engagement
85 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.4%
avg views ÷ 14,183 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,180
85 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
85
of 85 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
85 (4 August 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
270,259
Reactions total
17,058
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈15,700
Videos
≈2,300
Links
≈2,640
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 30s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17,008 reactions across 83 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👎
7,312
43.0%
😁
2,541
14.9%
❤
1,922
11.3%
👍
1,684
9.90%
❤🔥
1,154
6.79%
🔥
1,040
6.11%
👏
690
4.06%
😭
227
1.33%
👌
130
0.764%
💔
127
0.747%
😍
96
0.564%
🤬
39
0.229%
👀
28
0.165%
😡
17
0.1%
😢
1
0.006%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,058reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💬 «تو عوض شدی. این کاخ و اینجا بودنه که تو رو تغییر داده. یه نگاه به خودت بنداز؛ کنار تخت پادشاهی وایسادی، لباس ابریشمی پوشیدی که قیمتش اندازهی درآمد یک سال منه و وعده میدی که تو گوش ملکه زمزمه میکنی! واقعاً چه قدرتی داری، جز چاپلوسی و زبونبازی؟ واسه همین خواستی بیام اینجا تا این تجملات رو ببینم و مات و مبهوت بشم؟ بذار یه توصیه بهت بکنم، بانوی من... این آدمها از جنس تو نیستن. بهتره هیچوقت اینو فراموش نکنی. توی …
🐉🔥 چرا ملکه رینیرا خود را شاهزاده موعود میداند؟
🔹️در قسمت پایانی فصل سوم خاندان اژدها، ملکه رینیرا تارگرین پا را از یک حاکم سیاسی فراتر گذاشت و با ایستادن بر پلههای سپت اعظم، رسماً ردای یک منجی مذهبی را بر تن کرد. بسیاری این حرکت را آغاز جنون او میدانند، اما با نگاهی عمیقتر به مسیر زندگی رینیرا، این ادعای جسورانه محصولِ تلاقی بازیهای سیاسی و البته بنبستی مرگبار بود که او را به سمت این باور هدایت کرد.
🔸️رینیرا…
🐉🔥 اظهار نظر جدید رایان کندال، شورانر سریال خاندان اژدها، درباره دور شدن ویگار از ایموند، و آیا اینکه آلیس در این موضوع نقشی داشته یا خیر!
اگرچه هنوز قراره چگونگیها و چراییهای این داستان آشکار بشه، احساس کردیم که با خط داستانیِ «ایموندِ ویرانگر» فقط تا همینجا میتونستیم پیش بریم. ویگار خیلی فانه، اما اینقدر قدرتمند و شکستناپذیره که گاهی مجبور میشیم از خودمون بپرسیم: «چرا ویگار نمیتونست همهکس و همهچیز رو نابو…
🐉🔥 همراهان گرامی، در صورت تمایل به گفتگو درباره جهان نغمه و دیگر آثار فانتزی میتونید به گروه چت گات لایف به نام «براووس» بپیوندید.
🔸 لطفاً بدون اسپویلر چیزی درباره قسمت های پخش نشده از سریال های «خاندان اژدها» و «شوالیه هفت پادشاهی» ننویسید.
جهت ورود کلیک بفرمایید.
🔥 https://t.me/Braavos_GP
💬 «برات مهم نیست چون فقط داری وانمود میکنی! هر چیزی که زمانی برات ارزش داشت، حالا در چشمهات زشت شده. اینجا زشته؛ آدمهایی که بهشون دل بستی زشتن و حالا خودت هم زشت شدی...»
👤هلینا تارگرین خطاب به ملکه رینیرا تارگرین
❄️ #HotD > #Quote
🔥 @GoT_Life
🐉🔥رایان کندال، شورانر سریال خاندان اژدها، در صحبتهایی درباره شخصیت موردنظرش برای نشستن بر تختآهنین، آلیسنت هایتاور را انتخاب خود دانست. او در اینباره گفت:
حقیقتش، به نظرم آلیسنت، هیچ شخصیتی در طول سریال مثل اون فاصله میان داشتن و نداشتن قدرت رو مثل اون تجربه نکرده. آلیسنت همه چیز رو دیده. اژدهایی هم نداره، که به نظرم برای یک رهبر خردمند و با ثبات احتمالاً مهمه.
اما فکر میکنم با توجه به جایگاهی که الان توی داستا…
🐉🔥راز فرزند ایموند و آلیس ریورز
🔹️یکی از نظریههایی که بعد از پررنگتر شدن داستان آلیس ریورز و ایموند تارگرین دوباره مورد توجه قرار گرفته، به یک زنجیره خانوادگی عجیب مربوط میشود؛ زنجیرهای که اگر درست باشد، میتواند خون ایموند را از هارنهال به خاندان ونت، تالی و در نهایت استارکها برساند. اما پیش از هر چیز باید یک نکته را روشن کنیم... بخش مهمی از این نظریه هنوز در منابع رسمی تأیید نشده است. آنچه قطعی است با آنچه از…
💬 «فکر کردی همه قراره بیچونوچرا بپذیرنت؟ فکر کردی بهسادگی و در کمال شکوه روی تخت آهنین میشینی، همه متحد میشن، تابستون ابدی میشه و دیگه هیچوقت برف نمیاد؟ تو یه زنی، رینیرا. همیشه کسی پیدا میشه که باهات مخالفت کنه؛ کسی که منتظر باشه زمین بخوری و از سقوطت لذت ببره.»
👤دیمون تارگرین خطاب به ملکه رینیرا تارگرین
❄️ #HotD > #Quote
🔥 @GoT_Life
🐉🔥ایوان میچل، بازیگر نقش ایموند تارگرین در مجله Interview درباره سرنوشت ایموند صحبت میکند:
بهخاطر بازی تاجوتخت، همه ما میدانیم که در نهایت سرنوشت خاندان تارگرین به کجا ختم میشود؛ این خاندان خودش را نابود میکند... نمیخواهم چیزی را اسپویل کنم. اما بعد از ایموند، چیزی از او باقی خواهد ماند! شاید این اقدامات او باشد که زنجیرهای از اتفاقات را به راه میاندازد و در نهایت به پیامدهایی منجر میشود.
❄️ #HotD > #Inte…
Mommy issues final boss.
❄️ #HotD > #Fun
🔥 @GoT_Life
😁169❤4❤🔥1
Signed Mahziyar
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @Got_Life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Got_Life edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 32,075 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Got Life | House of the Dragon” (@Got_Life), 14,183 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Got_Life.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
