Channel
@GorillaGemsLoungeAMA
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
238subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001801663666 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GorillaGemsLoungeAMA |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GorillaGemsLoungeAMA |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 238 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 241 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:09 | 241 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 May 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 65 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
This morning, I had a meeting with my own brain. No charts. No price action. Just questions. What if we’ve been asking the wrong questions about crypto? 👉🏼Does crypto have a token problem or a liquidity problem? 👉🏼Where does liquidity actually go after a token dies? 👉🏼Why do millions of wallets hold dead tokens, yet it’s rare to find BTC or ETH abandoned in those same wallets? 👉🏼Why is every new cycle obsessed …
Join our weekend crypto showroom on X 🪙🚀 Here 📍 https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1yxBeeqYMlnJN Come hangout with real builders 🛠️👋
Your next Web3 opportunity starts here. AquacoinX is looking for ambitious creators, community leaders, marketers, and crypto enthusiasts to become official ambassadors. If you’ve been waiting for a chance to build your reputation while growing an exciting project, this is it. 🔥 Limited spots available. Apply now 👇 https://forms.gle/mfZg3i4NsEL8qsow8 Tag someone who should see this.
Let’s send this Gorilla in Trenches J7NcUoSjiGabZB9iwauyHYYkTKx2ssjzbcauzxxRpump
I spent some time exploring TCC, and one thing stood out immediately: this isn’t another project trying to overwhelm people with unnecessary complexity. Instead, it leans into something crypto has always needed—a community-first movement built around a clear identity and a shared mission. The branding is sharp, consistent, and memorable. From the black-and-gold visual identity to the “For the community, by the commu…
the Backpack for Kids collection on @ArtVybe, is a refreshing example of how NFTs can represent more than just profile pictures. 🎒 What is Backpack for Kids? It's a digital art collection centered around fun, colorful backpack-themed designs made for children and families. The artwork blends creativity with playful aesthetics, making it appealing to collectors who enjoy wholesome, family-friendly NFTs. Why it stan…
CALL AND ANNOUNCEMENT CHANNEL| GORILLA GEMS LOUNGE pinned a photo
All Active Running Buybots in our telegram community is terminated All Inactive partnerships are terminated- we’ll make a new list for all our active partners and continue to support their efforts and contributions to the space and we are also open to new partnerships Our weekly space from now henceforth would run only on sponsorship; if you want more spotlight on your project - then subscribe to becoming a sponsor…
https://airdrop.orbition.network?ref=7299476002
Just deep-dived into @AImediaXGEN And I’ll be honest this isn’t your typical “crypto project.” This feels like something different. A full-blown attempt at building a decentralized media economy powered by AI + community. No middlemen. No gatekeepers. Just attention → value → rewards. The core idea is wild: “We are the media now.” They’re not just talking blockchain… They’re talking about rewriting how inform…
If you had $1,000 to invest today, where would you put it? 🟠 BTC 🔵 ETH 🟢 Altcoins 🐸 Memecoins 💵 Keep it in stablecoins Drop your answer below and explain why. Let’s see where the community stands!
Good morning fam
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GorillaGemsLoungeAMA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 222,587 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@GorillaGemsLoungeAMA named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CALL AND ANNOUNCEMENT CHANNEL| GORILLA GEMS LOUNGE” (@GorillaGemsLoungeAMA), 238 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GorillaGemsLoungeAMA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.