Channel
@GordonGChang
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002431494457 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GordonGChang |
| Description | author of The Coming Collapse of China, China Is Going To War, and the upcoming Plan Red: China's Project to Destroy America |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GordonGChang |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 8 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 8 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2025 to 11 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Freedom isn’t free. Every freedom we defend and every law we uphold rests on the sacrifices of our veterans. We honor their service and strive each day to be worthy of it. We are forever in their debt. Happy Veterans Day 🇺🇸
https://t.co/T3o4DSNQ2Y In China, there will be blood on the floor, figuratively and perhaps literally as well. The CCP is now tearing itself apart. See: gatestoneinstitute.org/21996/xi-losin…. @ninarosenwald @GatestoneInst
❤1
I received this from a friend in Korea about a possible violation of U.N. Security Council sanctions by the South Korean government involving the Kaesong Foundation: “I am writing to share a detailed report concerning a highly troubling development in South Korea — the government’s recent move to reestablish the ‘Kaesong Foundation,’ an inter-Korean joint body that was dissolved after North Korea’s nuclear provocati…
https://t.co/jeTxVHsHNX China’s official “Golden Week” data show not only increases in trips taken and revenue generated but also “a bruising price war”: cnbc.com/2025/10/09/chi….
The free people of Korea will prevail. They are strong, they are resilient, they never give up. 👍
Fight, fight, fight harder, harder, harder!
We will not surrender our freedom to anyone.
Fight for Korea! 🇰🇷
Tonight on the @batchelorshow: Bruce Bechtol talking about North Korea, Russia, and Ukraine. Please tune in to @CBSRadio or download. Thanks.
From a friend in Korea, about the abuse of special prosecutions and impeachment threats: “I write to bring immediate attention to a distressing trend in South Korea, a key U.S. ally, where democratic norms, legal principles, and basic civil rights are coming under targeted political attacks. Utilizing its majority power, the Democratic Party of Korea is systematically leveraging special prosecutions and impeachment …
Are we really going to let Korea go communist over the will of its people?
The Lord will protect the good people of Korea.🇰🇷
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GordonGChang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,025,293 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@GordonGChang named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gordon G. Chang” (@GordonGChang), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GordonGChang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.