Channel
@GoldenShovel_Capital
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
935subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001527014865 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GoldenShovel_Capital |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 3 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GoldenShovel_Capital |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 935 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 944 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 944 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 3 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
103 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 62 | 60.2% | |
| ❤ | 22 | 21.4% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 4.85% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 4.85% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 3.88% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.971% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2023 to 2 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⏰ 下周可能的阿尔法项目 ✅ GODFATHER - https://twitter.com/ERCGODFATHER 来自Bossy的孵化项目，wl预售69ETH，会有很多支持者，Meme类型看起来不错，7月3日发射 ✅ 屠夫 - https://twitter.com/easyeight08 BUTCHER的新发布将在ETH，$CAPO-$BLUE 也将受到关注，隐形发布，热度很高，加入https://t.me/Newtokeneth ，7月3日发射 ✅ Rumor - https://twitter.com/rumorcoin 我听说团队很好。他们预售了200ETH，然后结束了预售。CA是安全的，并且表现良好。从社区的团队来看，它将于7月3日推出。 ✅ Tectum - https://twitter.com/tectumsocial 已经发布了许多实际应用程序，cmc/cg已经推出，BTC-L2建立在ET…
❤6💩4👍1
【CAPO】 我们都知道 il Capo Of Crypto 是谁，就是从BTC 16000开始一直喊空的那位大空头，那句著名的 “ 我见过最大的牛市陷阱” 就是出自他口，这个代币就是广大海外交易大V联合发起的项目，用于向加密市场最大的个人交易推特账户CAPO致敬！ 现在底部大概10X，池子900BNB，已上CMC，推特正在覆盖更多营销。 现 CAPO中文社区 拿出 20W枚 $CAPO 代币用于抽奖给社区成员 抽奖规则：关注以下社交媒体即可参与抽奖 （在 CAPO中文社区 抽） 1. https://t.me/ilcapotokencn 2. https://t.me/meta_goldenshovel 3. https://t.me/ColaCCCC 4. https://t.me/ChinaWhaleCommunity 5. https://t.me/liangjianshequ 6. https://t.me/Cr…
❤3👍3🤡1
【EDU】—— 币安IEO，4月28日18:00 发射 总供应：10亿 初始流通：1.45亿（IEO：0.5亿 + 项目方：0.95亿） 每月释放：0.22亿 IEO价格：$0.05 TinyTap的前世今生： Animoca收购了TinyTap 80.45%的股权，对价是3887.5万美金（现金约2700万，股票1000万左右）。考虑到Animoca的股票还是具有一定流动性，按照3887.5万美元，TinyTap估值约4830万美元。 $EDU 这种治理代币你不需要去了解可以用来做什么，那样很浪费时间，建议稍微看一下上述代币分配和Tinytap前世今生就大概明白这是什么一坨大便项目 评价： Binance给Animoca开通的亲密付项目，垃圾新概念土狗空气，没有产品没有数据，白皮书全是愿景，你说链改吧，tinytap也是封装垃圾，只不过是疫情期间在线教育工作者拉了拉运营数据罢了，现在疫情开放了还能有啥服务需求的增长？平…
👏5🫡4❤3👍2👎2
现在思路很简单也很明确了 265-255-240 三个位置 5月3号加息是否25bp？是的话是否最后一次加息？是否鸽派发言？ 假如有第三波主升浪的话那么至少得下到255这里附近上去 在没有利空消息前提 240附近有概率但不大 还是建议到时仓位部署时考虑进去留一后手 其次周末流动性差 现在有些超卖了 估计会有反弹 这种反弹我就不去吃了 可以好好休息 盯着那三个位置就好 接下来还有EDU、SUI的打新 以及做多的建仓 节点挤一块了 这期间千万注意合理安排资金 个人资金安排比例分享 EDU ：SUI ：合约 4：1：5 最后还需要考虑的一点就是 强势山寨以及坎昆升级、香港概念等赛道币种 欢迎多讨论这个 抓住这一波
👍5
₿uy & $ell Co.,Ltd pinned Deleted message
【Aegis】—— 公开预售（价格发现模型，28号22:00结束） 总量：100万枚 空投加营销释放：3万枚(1.5万 $AEG + 1.5万 $xAEG) 预售：15万枚(10万 $AEG + 5万 $xAEG)，100%TGE 硬顶：$3,796,460.86 (50%加池子、50%国库) Camelot的仿盘，中文名应该叫神盾。做DEX + Launchpad的，$AEG 是治理代币，可以质押获得 $xAEG ，$xAEG 呢除了挖矿的收益还可以获得DEX的手续费分红以及发射台的发射收益分红，目前还是V1的主网， 有一点值得留意的是其发射台侧重于LSD这类RealYield的项目。V2还在测试，加了贿赂机制以及Curve化等措施去提升 $xAEG 的激励。个人觉得可以留意这个项目，我是比较反感价格发现模型这种预售方式，我会开盘看看什么情况，感兴趣的可以参考以上信息自行决定。 ———————————————— 电报 | …
❤1💩1😁1
1.【PERPY】发射 2:00 | Camelot 总供应量：10亿 预售分配：4亿 预售总额：500万 U 预售价格 ： $0.02 100%TGE 初始FDV：2000万 U Perpyfinance 是一个永续合约资管协议，质押 $PRY 可以获得平台100%手续费收入和享受交易手续费的3%-50%折扣，以及可以在个人广告位享受氪金酷炫功能。但是目前协议还在beta阶段，只能开BTC和ETH的合约和投资组合只支持单项标的。 看法： $PRY 算是产品体验性比较好的一个资管协议，不仅可以看到带单者的分润和其往常收益战绩曲线。可以期待其后续发展，在产品完成度不断完善的基础形成投资社交集群也是值得想像的（通过LENS集成），不过风险点也很显著，可能也是链上资管协议的通病：产品要求很高、监管合规性、用户的获客（含交易牛人的入驻，这又取决于交易品种和产品要求） 玩法： 神剑的项目大家懂的，破发稳住再说，慢热型项目 —————…
👍9❤3
1. $DZoo —— 双链+交易所 发射 18:00 Daomaker的SHO项目，点我查看白皮书 总量：10亿 初始流通量：2.7亿 初始FDV：6M U HC：2.42M U SHO：35%TGE，1month Cliff后2年线性释放，30DAO/签，大概50U额度 开盘价：0.006 SHO回本价：0.017 不算30%平台税费 热度挺高的ponzi，你可以理解为卡片gamefi也可以理解为普通的质押土矿项目。这项目的优点以及看点并不是项目本身有多亮眼（其实很普通的带有博弈性质的土矿玩法），而是大饼环境以及团队实名背书和SHO筹码极度分散以及公益噱头，这是值得去尝试参与的。缺点也很明显，初始FDV过高以及单币模型的螺旋。 2. $MESS —— UniswapV2 发射 20:00 合约 0xEa65976Cac7BBD785b134CCEe1479F97Aab60566 4M的子币，无限供应的。OBT阶段产出…
❤2
【ETHforestAI】是 Oxbull 在ARB链发射的第一个IDO项目：一个集成了AI聊天机器人的 Web3学习平台 一、项目机制介绍 1. ETHforestAI 凭借其“Learn to Earn”元素，旨在激励用户积极参与该平台，并以有趣和有益的方式增加他们的知识。用户可以通过完成各种教育活动和挑战来赚取$ETHFAI，从而使学习Web3既有趣又能带来经济回报。 2. ETHforestAI 的另一个关键特性是它的Real Yield机制，它允许表现最好的用户通过平台获得真实收益。除此之外，该平台还将推出一个Creator Economy (创作者经济)，允许创作者将他们的知识和专长货币化。通过创建教育、营销或最新新闻内容并通过我们的平台与他人分享，他们可以获得$ETHFAI并为 Web3 生态系统的成长和发展做出贡献。 3. ETHforestAI 不仅仅是为了获得奖励。它还与营造社区感和归属感有关。我们的…
👍9❤3🏆1
抽神剑下一个IDO : WINR白名单(包分配) WINR协议是一个完全自主的流动性和激励基础设施，专门为需要交易对手资产金库的链上游戏构建，双币模型。协议上第一个产品是Justbet 预售信息： 时间：2023年3月9日 硬顶：3M USDC 白名单：500 USDC最大贡献 抽奖规则： 1. 关注 https://twitter.com/WINRProtocol 2. 关注 https://t.me/just_bet_official 3. 关注 https://t.me/GoldenShovel_Capital 4. 满足前3并且回复这条置顶即可参与抽奖
👍2
抽取META（大卡，拉了60X）新项目 0xACID 的白名单，场外白名单好像100U了 奖励：白名单 X 5，白名单预售有额外空投奖励 0xACID协议简介： 0xAcid是一个社区驱动的协议，协议在Arbitrum运行，公平启动，0xACID协议定位是让LSD资产(例如stETH、rETH、frxETH等等)收益最大化,并提供远高于普通LSD资产的真实收益(普通LSD资产大概只有4～5%APR),伴随国库ETH相关资产增多对整个以太坊L1和L2产生影响力。协议长期持有LSD相关资产 评价：ARB的大卡项目，LSD赛道。上一个项目是META。也是大卡，拉了60X 机制等于长期做多ETH，并持续赚取Ethereum节点真实收益 热点概念：Arb + RealYield + LSD + 香港 抽奖规则 1. 关注 https://twitter.com/0xAcidDAO 2. 关注 https://t.me/Group…
👍1
抽生威兔白名单 1. 关注本频道 https://t.me/GoldenShovel_Capital 2. 加入生威兔项目电报 https://t.me/shengweituCN 3. 回复这条置顶消息并完成1、2步骤即代表参与抽奖 明天晚上抽3个散户白名单，额度在100-150u一个地址。
👍8
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @GoldenShovel_Capital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 460,838 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@GoldenShovel_Capital named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“₿uy & $ell Co.,Ltd” (@GoldenShovel_Capital), 935 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GoldenShovel_Capital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.