Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gold Foresight

Channel

Gold Foresight

@GoldForesight

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

474subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001485796234
TypeChannel
Username@GoldForesight
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GoldForesight

Growth

47347947622 August 2026 — 479 subscribers23 August 2026 — 478 subscribers30 August 2026 — 475 subscribers9 September 2026 — 473 subscribers18 September 2026 — 474 subscribers47422 August 202618 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 28 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 472–480 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:37474+1
9 Sept 2026, 11:40473-2
30 Aug 2026, 20:33475-3
23 Aug 2026, 07:45478-1
22 Aug 2026, 03:31479first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 22 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1368.4%
🔥315.8%
👎210.5%
🤝15.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2025 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC32 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Another Instant Payout Received! ​I’ve been testing PipSurge over the last few days, and the payouts have been super consistent. Requested a withdrawal of $96.50 today, and it hit my wallet in under 10 minutes! ​Really solid and genuine platform for profit growth so far. If anyone wants to check it out, here’s the link: pipsurge.site

1 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC119 viewsread 22 August 2026
Poll

Anyone want gold update?

  1. Yes78%
  2. No22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 May 2026, 07:58 UTC199 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Price is already running 660 pips. If you're still in the trade, make sure to move your stop loss to break even to hold.

3

30 Apr 2026, 06:54 UTC182 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

XAUUSD 4H Short Plan Bias: Looking for short Entry: 1. Mark 4640-4660 FVG zone on TradingView 2. Wait for price to reach the zone 3. Wait for 1H/4H bearish confirmation 4. Short after confirmation only Invalidation: 4H close above 4680

4🤝1

11 Dec 2025, 04:27 UTC323 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Gold outlook: Demand is currently strong in this area. We're looking to buy if the price reaches (a certain level)

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @GoldForesight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTCAnonymous Poll18 voters

Anyone want gold update?

  1. Yes78%
  2. No22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2025 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Mr BaNNa ⚜️
@OfficialMrBaNNa · 25,131
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 September 2026
FOREX WITH ISHA
@forexlearningfx · 29,094
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
🇮🇩 TheForexSupport | Free Forex Signals
@TheFXsupportSignalsID · 43,500
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 August 2026
𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐎𝐅 𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐗 𝐏𝐑𝐎
@KingOfForexProOfficial · 28,502
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 9 September 2026
Shaakuni Trap 👑
@shaakunitrap · 69,365
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gold Foresight” (@GoldForesight), 474 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GoldForesight.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.