Channel
@GodiniAgency
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
338subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001733394785 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GodiniAgency |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GodiniAgency |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 338 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 343 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 349 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 349 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 July 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 60 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📊 Este mercado bajista tiene una profundidad del 49%. Todos los anteriores tocaron fondo mucho más abajo. 🤔👇🏻 📉 Por profundidad, es el más leve registrado hasta ahora. Por el reloj, no ha terminado: los mercados bajistas anteriores duraron aproximadamente 1/3 más antes de alcanzar los mínimos... 🥶❄️
Signed 𝑫𝒂𝒚 ✨
💥 Cada colapso global comienza con Corea del Sur. Suena ridículo. Hasta que miras la historia... 🤔👇🏻 👉 1997: - El won coreano colapsó - El KOSPI se desplomó - Las reservas de divisas casi se agotaron - Luego la Crisis Financiera Asiática se extendió por todo el mundo 👉 2000: - Las acciones de semiconductores surcoreanas alcanzaron su pico primero - Meses después, el Nasdaq cayó un 78% - La burbuja de las puntocom e…
Signed 𝑫𝒂𝒚 ✨
🔥 Si buscamos uno de los posibles suelos o zonas de acumulación en el caso de que sigamos bajando... 👇🏻 📈 Bitcoin NUNCA cayó por debajo de su costo eléctrico de producción... 😏✔️
Signed 𝑫𝒂𝒚 ✨
🕯 Bitcoin está intentando cambiar la tendencia, pero la transición sigue costándole... 🤔👇🏻 🔥 El precio ha perdido la confluencia de las Bases de Costo de 7D y 30D a medida que el momentum se estanca y deriva sin convicción. Sin embargo, el momentum permanece dentro de la Zona de Transición. ⚡️ 🔮 Mientras se mantenga por encima de −50, Bitcoin sigue en consolidación, con la recuperación de $65K siendo crítica para r…
Signed 𝑫𝒂𝒚 ✨
📊 Bitcoin NUNCA tocó fondo por encima del Precio Equilibrado... 👇🏻 🔥 Precio Equilibrado Actual: $38,382. SI esto sucede, me iré ALL-in... 😏
Signed 𝑫𝒂𝒚 ✨
📊 La Supertrend diaria de Bitcoin se ha vuelto verde. La vez anterior que esto sucedió lo impulsó casi un 15% en 4 semanas... 🤔👇🏻 🔮 Un impulso similar significaría que Bitcoin alcanzará $76,000 para agosto. 👀
Signed 𝑫𝒂𝒚 ✨
⚠️ El Índice de Riesgo no predice repuntes. Mide si los vendedores aún controlan el mercado. En este momento, el Riesgo está cruzando el umbral de Bajo Riesgo. 🤔 📊 Históricamente, ese ha sido el punto en el que la presión bajista se agota y comienzan a emerger las condiciones para la recuperación. ⚡️ 🔮 La confirmación llega solo después de que Bitcoin permanezca anclado en el régimen de Bajo Riesgo... 🥶❄️
Signed 𝑫𝒂𝒚 ✨
💥 Más de $250M en interés abierto desaparecidos en una sola vela de 1 minuto solo en BTC. 📉 👉 Mientras tanto, el precio recuperó la mayor parte minutos después. ⛔️ Me pregunto cuál era la idea ahí, no puedo imaginar que esa fuera una ejecución deseada en esa posición. ¿Intentando causar una cascada bajista? 👀
Signed 𝑫𝒂𝒚 ✨
🕯 ¿Está a punto de producirse un breakout nativo de bitcoin? El impulso se está reconstruyendo, pero la confirmación aún no ha llegado. 🤔👇🏻 💥 Bitcoin ha salido de su régimen de capitulación y una vez más está dentro del Área de Transición. Aquí es donde comienza un nuevo impulso o el momentum se desvanece de nuevo en debilidad. 📉 👉 La próxima prueba es clara: → Recuperar la Línea de Encendido → Construir suficient…
Signed 𝑫𝒂𝒚 ✨
TECHO → 1.430 DÍAS → TECHO 2013 → 2017 → 2021 → 2025 FONDO → 1.460 DÍAS → FONDO 2011 → 2015 → 2018 → 2022 → 2026 🕯 El último techo llegó casi exactamente en el horario previsto. Ahora el mismo ciclo apunta al próximo gran fondo de Bitcoin en 2026. 🤔 🔮 La mayoría de las personas entrarán en pánico. El dinero inteligente lo llamará la próxima oportunidad generacional de compra. La historia se está repitiendo una vez…
Signed 𝑫𝒂𝒚 ✨
🕯 La Fed acaba de dar un giro clave: las probabilidades de subida de tipos en julio cayeron por debajo del 12.3% tras los últimos datos de inflación. 🤔👇🏻 🔥 El mercado cotiza un escenario más dovish: menos presión de la Fed, más liquidez y más impulso para activos de riesgo. ⚡️ 🔮 Bitcoin, criptos y bolsas podrían entrar en una nueva fase alcista. El cambio de marea podría haber comenzado... 🥶❄️
❤1
Signed 𝑫𝒂𝒚 ✨
🕯 Bitcoin está siguiendo el guion: la fase de consolidación está tomando forma... 🧐👇🏻 🔥 Tras la ruptura de junio, la tendencia del mercado ya no se está deteriorando. En cambio, está construyendo una transición de consolidación/alcista, la fase en la que la presión de venta comienza a desvanecerse y la estructura del mercado se estabiliza. 🥶❄️ 🔮 Pero esto no es la recuperación en sí, es la base que necesita una rec…
Signed 𝑫𝒂𝒚 ✨
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GodiniAgency. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 972,451 of 1,603,893entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ɢᴏᴅɪɴɪ ᴀɢᴇɴᴄʏ™” (@GodiniAgency), 338 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GodiniAgency.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.