Бомж жив 🎉
😭43🙊21❤18❤🔥6🗿2🤷♀2🌭1🎄1

Channel
@GoBomjNews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,860subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001943327767 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GoBomjNews |
| Description | Бот: @GoBomjBot Чат: @GoBomjChat 🧙♂️ Главный бомж: @melikhovoriginal |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GoBomjNews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 4,860 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 4,875 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 4,876 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 4,876 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 29 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
923 reactions across 19 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 267 | 28.9% | |
| 👍 | 121 | 13.1% | |
| 😴 | 101 | 10.9% | |
| 😭 | 47 | 5.09% | |
| 🗿 | 37 | 4.01% | |
| 😐 | 30 | 3.25% | |
| 💅 | 29 | 3.14% | |
| 🙊 | 25 | 2.71% | |
| 👨💻 | 23 | 2.49% | |
| 💘 | 19 | 2.06% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 1.73% | |
| 😈 | 16 | 1.73% | |
| 🐳 | 15 | 1.63% | |
| 🙏 | 14 | 1.52% | |
| 🆒 | 13 | 1.41% | |
| 🎃 | 13 | 1.41% | |
| 🕊 | 13 | 1.41% | |
| 🤝 | 13 | 1.41% | |
| 🫡 | 12 | 1.30% | |
| 💊 | 11 | 1.19% | |
| 19 further kinds | 88 | 9.53% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 923reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2024 to 10 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Бомж жив 🎉
😭43🙊21❤18❤🔥6🗿2🤷♀2🌭1🎄1
❤️🔥 Напиши своим друзьям или знакомым анонимно с помощью нашего бота 👩🏻❤️👨🏻 А также узнай мнение о себе 🔗 Нажимай и забирай свою личную ссылку, размести её в своём ТГ/Тикток/Инсте/ВК и других соц.сетях 👇🏼
🤗8❤7🤝3😐1🙊1
Победите розыгрыша ! Просьба написать в лс всех победителей со своим id для начисления 5.000₽ Id можно взять здесь @getmyid_bot
👍5
Розыгрыш завершен! Участвовало 85 чел. Победителями стали: @Sweth1art, @regulka56, Стакан 🦭, @IamUnivErsal212, @noname_nw. Проверить итоги
❤19👨💻8🎃6🤔3🍓2
Бомжи тут? Делаем розыгрыш на +5000₽ к балансу ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤13🔥5💅3
🍩 Вернули Донат Чтобы купить что-то, нужно перейти в @Gobomjbot — открыть меню и нажать на 💰 донат (/shop) Оплата возможна в Stars 🌟 или криптоботом, как вам удобно 🤗 Всем спасибо за поддержку нашего проекта ❤️
👍19❤8👨💻2🆒2
🤑Платим деньги за тик ток/рилс/шортс с нашим Бомж ботом. Каждые 3к просмотров - 300₽. Чем больше просмотров тем больше денег 🤑 Выкладываете видео и отправляете ссылку мне в лс @melikhovoriginal
🗿29🤝10👍6😐5👌3🤣3🤷♀3🫡2
А вот и наши победители 🎁 Поздравляем !🎉
😴91❤26👍15🕊11🐳9🆒9🤷8🙏7
Розыгрыш завершен! Участвовало 118 чел. Победителями стали: @KatishBinDunDun, @xlebok, @mq1zem. Проверить итоги
❤40😴10👍7🐳4😈4🍌3💋2🍾1
Сделаем розыгрыш завтра ? 🎁 (3 победителя по 5.000₽)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤21🙏6👍4💘3💅1🦄1
НОВИНКА🔥1st Dep от R7 Casino! 👌 Получи 200% + 100 FS на первый депозит уже сейчас:👇 R7CASINO R7CASINO R7CASINO Вводи промокод - R7100100 Пополняй свой счет от 2 500 RUB Получай бонус 200% + 100 FS Максимальный бонус - 20 000 RUB Сладко, правда? 😛 Это еще не все👇🏻 ▪️Средний eRTP 98% ▪️Быстрые выплаты 24/7 ▪️Welcome Pack 300% + 225 FS ▪️Кешбек до 20% ежедневно Врывайся на новый уровень с R7 Casino!
👍15❤3💅2💘1
ОФИГЕННЫЙ ЗАНОС СТРИМЕРА ТРЕПУТИНА НА БОЛЕЕ 1 100 000 RUB НА R7 CASINO! 😎 R7CASINO R7CASINO R7CASINO Стример сыграл в казинохе, где средний eRTP - 98%, и не прогадал. Врывайся побеждать и ты🔥 - Cтавка: 1 000 RUB - Слот: Chicken Rush от провайдера BGaming Воспользуйся плюхами R7 CASINO: 🔻Средний eRTP — 98% 🔻Щедрый кэшбэк до 20% 🔻Сверхбыстрые выводы 🔻Новенький Lexus RX в подарок Забирай промокод WELCOME для бо…
🙉7💅2👍1💊1😐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GoBomjNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Бомжи тут? Делаем розыгрыш на +5000₽ к балансу ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сделаем розыгрыш завтра ? 🎁 (3 победителя по 5.000₽)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Дорогие друзья, мы уже в процессе самого крупного обновления. Нужна ваша помощь. Делаем один общий баланс на все чаты или как сейчас разный баланс в чатах?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Хотите систему рангов в бомже ? От подзаборного бомжа до бомжа миллионера Свои варианты рангов напишите в комментариях
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2024 to 10 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@GoBomjNews named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bomj News” (@GoBomjNews), 4,860 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GoBomjNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.