Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анонимная оценка 💘 | Тесты на дружбу

Bot

Анонимная оценка 💘 | Тесты на дружбу

@Anonimnye_ocenka_bot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

16,451monthly users

+1,954 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID7046113123
TypeBot
Username@Anonimnye_ocenka_bot
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Anonimnye_ocenka_bot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,44519,05116,2487 August 2026 — 14,497 monthly users8 August 2026 — 14,411 monthly users9 August 2026 — 14,515 monthly users10 August 2026 — 14,389 monthly users11 August 2026 — 14,354 monthly users12 August 2026 — 14,359 monthly users13 August 2026 — 14,462 monthly users14 August 2026 — 14,452 monthly users15 August 2026 — 14,291 monthly users17 August 2026 — 14,270 monthly users18 August 2026 — 14,306 monthly users19 August 2026 — 14,291 monthly users19 August 2026 — 14,291 monthly users21 August 2026 — 14,275 monthly users22 August 2026 — 14,268 monthly users24 August 2026 — 14,007 monthly users25 August 2026 — 13,869 monthly users26 August 2026 — 13,867 monthly users27 August 2026 — 13,828 monthly users29 August 2026 — 13,721 monthly users30 August 2026 — 13,595 monthly users31 August 2026 — 13,445 monthly users1 September 2026 — 14,202 monthly users3 September 2026 — 14,704 monthly users4 September 2026 — 14,753 monthly users8 September 2026 — 14,608 monthly users10 September 2026 — 14,205 monthly users12 September 2026 — 13,993 monthly users14 September 2026 — 14,938 monthly users16 September 2026 — 14,904 monthly users18 September 2026 — 14,466 monthly users1 October 2026 — 17,080 monthly users6 October 2026 — 16,656 monthly users10 October 2026 — 17,292 monthly users13 October 2026 — 17,311 monthly users15 October 2026 — 17,275 monthly users16 October 2026 — 17,346 monthly users17 October 2026 — 17,495 monthly users18 October 2026 — 18,316 monthly users19 October 2026 — 18,710 monthly users21 October 2026 — 18,895 monthly users22 October 2026 — 18,868 monthly users23 October 2026 — 18,810 monthly users24 October 2026 — 18,789 monthly users25 October 2026 — 18,944 monthly users26 October 2026 — 19,051 monthly users27 October 2026 — 18,833 monthly users28 October 2026 — 18,603 monthly users29 October 2026 — 18,019 monthly users30 October 2026 — 17,664 monthly users31 October 2026 — 17,473 monthly users2 November 2026 — 17,256 monthly users3 November 2026 — 16,953 monthly users4 November 2026 — 16,665 monthly users5 November 2026 — 16,284 monthly users6 November 2026 — 16,386 monthly users8 November 2026 — 16,451 monthly users16,4517 August 20268 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 93 days, net +1,954. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,604–19,892 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)Monthly usersChange
8 Nov 2026, 12:2016,451+65
6 Nov 2026, 09:5616,386+102
5 Nov 2026, 08:4116,284-381
4 Nov 2026, 08:2616,665-288
3 Nov 2026, 07:4016,953-303
2 Nov 2026, 09:4617,256-217
31 Oct 2026, 15:3917,473-191
30 Oct 2026, 18:3717,664-355
29 Oct 2026, 16:5618,019-584
28 Oct 2026, 16:3118,603-230
27 Oct 2026, 16:0918,833-218
26 Oct 2026, 15:0919,051+107
25 Oct 2026, 15:3118,944+155
24 Oct 2026, 14:2718,789-21
23 Oct 2026, 16:1518,810-58
22 Oct 2026, 17:5818,868-27
21 Oct 2026, 14:1718,895+185
19 Oct 2026, 09:3618,710+394
18 Oct 2026, 08:0418,316+821
17 Oct 2026, 08:5017,495first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анонимная оценка 💘 | Тесты на дружбу” (@Anonimnye_ocenka_bot), 16,451 monthly users as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Anonimnye_ocenka_bot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.