Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GneVxz

Channel

GneVxz

@GneVxz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

127subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002111039956
TypeChannel
Username@GneVxz
DescriptionInstagram : gnevxz
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/GneVxz

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:16127first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
354.4%
avg views ÷ 127 subscribers
Avg views / post
450
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held19 (15 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total8,101
Reactions total184
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
507
Videos
13
Links
29

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54452051633064101326133.2%
custom 54450655339196194924122.3%
custom 51883376992070134862614.1%
custom 5305801794872448671168.70%
custom 5343668429872177769168.70%
custom 5350384526067537184105.43%
🎃52.72%
custom 547010389188020966031.63%
custom 534854811831085056621.09%
custom 544085750964658860721.09%
custom 534810469300230795910.543%
custom 544073140511181054110.543%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 22:35 UTC13 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

💿🙃😆🙂😀😅😆🤨💿 У меня достаточно много таких артов, которые я так и не смогу закончить... Это Луна. По сюжету, она обычная девушка, которая полюбила полководца вражеской армии. Она лекарь, который пока лечит людей наносит вред себе, так как сила ей досталась вредоносная и не подходящая под неё. При каждом использовании ее силы — ее волосы, с кончиков, становятся белыми. Что показывает сколько ей осталось до.. ее сме

custom 53436684298721777691custom 54407314051118105411custom 54408575096465886071custom 54701038918802096601

14 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC292 viewsread 14 August 2026
Poll

Это я забыла еще 2 варианта добавить :с

  1. Адопты🧸50%
  2. Коммишки🥰85%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC310 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Poll

🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤❓

  1. Коллаборации и трейды👀26%
  2. Персонажи и их истории⌨️52%
  3. Мини-комиксы(планируются в ближайшее время)😏90%
  4. Ваш вариант ответа(в комментарии пожалуйста)🫂10%

The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 53436684298721777692custom 54701038918802096602🎃1custom 54408575096465886071

14 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC301 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟 И... снова здравствуйте! ✋ Насчём сначала так как здесь не мало новых и приятных лиц. Меня зовут GneVxz, но можете звать меня и по имени, я не против. Приятно познакомиться, я Катя.😁 И перейдём к небольшому обсуждению. Так как я сейчас спустя... год(?) как я забросила рисование и углубилась в работу ИРЛ и учёбу решила наконец-то вернуться в роль активного художника и зарабатывать не только ножки натаптыв

custom 53436684298721777692

14 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC409 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Всем новеньким приветик! В ближайшее время снова создам опросник для нашего с вами взаимодействия. А-ля.. что вы желаете здесь видеть :) 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩❤️

custom 53436684298721777697🎃1

12 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC752 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Два мини спойлера

custom 53503845260675371847custom 53436684298721777693

8 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC760 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Дальше - больше :)

custom 53436684298721777691custom 53481046930023079591custom 53485481183108505661

8 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC750 views17 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🅰️🩸🩸🩸🩸🎀🩸🩸🩸🩸 ▪️▪️▪️ 🌟🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🌟 Коллаборация с Фелт. Пару дет назад мы с ней договаривались на интересный трейд тематики 1⃣8⃣🆗🫢 Ниже будет ссылочка на постик с трейдом📍 Сейчас же, когла я наконец-то решила возвращаться в среду активного 🌟🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🌟 Ии... предложила Фелт коллаборацию. Там было несколько вариантов, но мы предпочли выбрать этот. Безумно нравится концепт и контраст наших стилей. Спасибо большое за новый

custom 54452051633064101328🎃3custom 51883376992070134863custom 54450655339196194922custom 53503845260675371841

2 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC618 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Посмотрите какую ляпоту нарисовали детишки у меня на работе. Красота же, ну!♥️

custom 54452051633064101324custom 51883376992070134862

1 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC560 views29 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 544520516330641013220custom 53058017948724486714custom 54450655339196194923custom 53503845260675371842

28 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC437 views14 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸😛 Такой вот не микро стройлер Это попытка понять светотень, потому что на предыдущем арте с Лесли я ее не особо познала ?🤡?

custom 51883376992070134865custom 53058017948724486715custom 54452051633064101324

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GneVxz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTCAnonymous Poll34 voters

Это я забыла еще 2 варианта добавить :с

  1. Адопты🧸50%
  2. Коммишки🥰85%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTCAnonymous Poll42 voters

🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤❓

  1. Коллаборации и трейды👀26%
  2. Персонажи и их истории⌨️52%
  3. Мини-комиксы(планируются в ближайшее время)😏90%
  4. Ваш вариант ответа(в комментарии пожалуйста)🫂10%

The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 755,575 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GneVxz” (@GneVxz), 127 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GneVxz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.